Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021April 2021May 2021
1234567891011121314151617
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Here and Nowhere Else

Before watching Six in Paris (recently released on DVD for the first time by Icarus), it never occurred to me that the United States hasn’t had a significant anthology or omnibus film in at least half a century. Does New York Stories ring a bell? Maybe Paris, je t’aime—but that came out 15 years ago and was a European production. There were more under the studio system of Classic Hollywood, but even then it’s curios like If I Had a Million, and no masterpieces. Such a system not only made it possible but easy to wrangle together half a dozen stars and some of the best directors in the world at the time. There’s “solidarity” there: when artists are working near each other, they’ll collaborate, formally or indirectly; on the other hand, egos too close for comfort produce their own brilliant works of revenge and rivalry.

Howard Hawks saw High Noon and, “thought it was a piece of junk… I thought it was phony,” so he made Rio Bravo in response. Going back a decade to 1948, Hawks had John Wayne play his first real heel in Red River, and Wayne’s frequent collaborator and torturer John Ford saw it and told Hawks, “I didn’t know the dumb son of a bitch could act.” Ford immediately cast Wayne as an old man in She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, a key film in the actor’s body of work that wouldn’t be there unless Ford saw what his peers were doing and reacted.

Six in Paris, assembled in 1965, suffers from too much bad handheld camerawork. Only Claude Chabrol’s segment, La Muette, has any satisfying images (though Éric Rohmer’s piece, a quick caper, is fun enough). [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWWEsMIw0J8] Jean Rabier shoots Chabrol and star/muse/wife Stéphane Audran in their actual home as Chabrol takes on the part of the bourgeois monster husband he’d make so many of just a few years later. His son (played by an actor) walks in on Chabrol groping the maid in his bedroom. He scoffs at his son when he opens the door: “I wasn’t doing anything, she was just showing me around.” The maid leaves and the son, silent, stares at his father as he drapes himself on the too-small-bed. A nub of a cigarette hangs from his mouth, the face of death: “Did you finish top of your class?… Good… It’s good to finish on top.”

Audran plays dumb, and through the eyes of their son (who finds earplugs and puts them in to drown out his parents’ bickering), we see their marriage break down. Audran asks her husband why he’s leaving so early: “I have to work…” “You know I know it’s the maid’s day off!” Chabrol pushes her down the stairs, and she dies like a rag doll as their son walks off reasonably happy to another day of school in Paris. Again, because of Rabier’s precise camerawork (in other words, he used a tripod), Chabrol’s piece towers over the rest of Six in Paris, which surprisingly reaches its nadir with Jean-Luc Godard’s contribution (a “half work”—Godard just “conceived” it, while Albert Maysles shot it—poorly). La Muette comes at the end, saving the film from the dustbin.

I’d say the same about 1978’s Germany in Autumn and the 30-minute piece by Rainer Werner Fassbinder that opens it. Even more than Six in Paris, Fassbinder’s segment practically erases the rest of the film, another 90 minutes of contributions from directors like Alexander Kluge, Volker Schlöndorff, and Margarethe von Trotta. One doesn’t necessarily have to know about the Red Army Faction or the 1977 “German Autumn” to understand what Fassbinder’s segment is about: political turmoil, national unrest, violence in the streets, and reasonable paranoia about state surveillance echo through every home and relationship in proximity.

In his essay “Through the Looking Glass,” Nick Pinkerton points out that Fassbinder, a fan and conscious rival of Chabrol, must’ve seen La Muette at some point, and perhaps used it as the starting point for his own omnibus contribution 12 years later. In both pieces, the directors present themselves in their own homes looking and acting as boorishly as possible, with Chabrol doing a dry run of the Jean Yanne role in This Man Must Die, and Fassbinder looking as bloated as ever, incorrigible, obnoxious, horrible to his lover and his mother, and a bipolar paranoiac with a cocaine habit that clearly isn’t going away anytime soon. I can’t see any contemporary American filmmaker daring to be so open in their work, despite the current corporate emphasis on personal trauma and “journeys” and “healing.” That’s all wallpaper in comparison.

Oppression begets oppression, and when Fassbinder throws out his lover out of their apartment and immediately calls for him to come back, like a baby, his earlier comments to a journalist about the hope of people seeing his films about marriages and perhaps reconsidering their own marriages are thrown into sharp relief. This was an artist vivisecting himself in “solidarity” with his peers, whose contributions (admittedly, says von Trotta) paled in comparison. Nothing else addressed the immediate problem of political issues effecting personal lives in direct ways.

Such is the nature of collectives, friends and peers: only rarely, like with Classic Hollywood or the French New Wave, do you get a solid batch of at least two dozen top directors and actors. Two years after Six in Paris came a much better film, Far From Vietnam, an international collaboration which again features a Godard segment, but this one is the diamond: we see Godard behind a gigantic Mitchell camera from various angles, his right eye always in the viewfinder and his face always half obscured. He describes, in voiceover, a dilemma he faced when approached about the film: “I wanted to show the beautiful thing in the world—a naked woman—torn apart by cluster bombs.” But before being denied, he leaves it there, and continues speaking in the same measured tone he’s taken throughout his typically circuitous thoughts, most of it “cushion” that makes the comment about the image we don’t actually “see” but can’t get out of our minds all the more shocking when it comes.

There’s no war now (an incorrect statement, but functionally true in daily life for millions of people), but we’ve been under the thumb of the coronavirus pandemic for over a year now, and even though most say they’ll never watch anything corona-related now or ever, I don’t know how American artists can avoid dealing with this period directly in the work. Imagine six prominent American filmmakers coming together to make an omnibus work about the last year, and everything in it: the virus, the election, the protests, the reshaping of our economy. Who could rise to the occasion if asked? More importantly, who’d have the initiative to ask?

I’m struggling to think of six filmmakers who could cohere and produce something substantial, and I doubt they’d get along: Kelly Reichardt, Clint Eastwood, Quentin Tarantino, Jordan Peele, Spike Lee, and Eliza Hittman. An odd bunch, but there aren’t many openly political filmmakers in America who are also still good. I’m not interested about what Oliver Stone has to say about the pandemic, and I left documentarians like Alex Gibney out (who already has a coronavirus documentary, released many months ago). Tarantino, I should clarify, isn’t political in the least, but the pandemic’s worldwide closure of movie theaters surely could’ve produced some of the greatest and most personal work of his career. And he’s someone who could rip his guts out and make something beautiful on camera.

But, like so many others, he’s isolated physically (in Tel Aviv, no less)—but I also don’t think there’s any real community between filmmakers in America right now, or at any point in my lifetime. The 1990s may have had some great films and many new good directors, but it was not like the “New Hollywood” of the 1970s, there was never any threat to the superstructure: Miramax, a division of Disney, released Pulp Fiction. Tarantino, and later Wes Anderson and Paul Thomas Anderson, were “units of one” as they collected their wunderkind magazine profiles and became friendly. They all hung out, they all laughed, but for what? To do coke in a locked screening room while a miserable Fiona Apple tries to get out?

Maybe this is why there was never a real response to 9/11 in American cinema. This is astonishing to me, and as we approach the 20th anniversary, there hasn’t been a decent film about 9/11 made by an American (United 93 and World Trade Center, both released in 2006, are atrocious). There was a Franco-American film in 2002 called 11/9, but here in the States, people were silent. Beyond “go shopping,” the invasion of Afghanistan blunted everyone’s artistic behavior, and we started to “rebuild” before anything had really started. There was a “concert for 9/11,” and it was star-studded, you bet, just a month after the attacks—yet with Iraq, crickets.

This was an odd mixture of Pearl Harbor-esque “induced ultra-patriotism” and the media blackout on anything about the subsequent wars. There were no coffins on the news, nor much up-close footage of soldiers, civilians, and “enemy combatants” ripping each other apart. Just a few blurry shots of explosions in the distance, filtered through night-cam, always too far to tell that anyone’s hurt, that anyone’s there at all, way over there, where boys and girls fear to tread. You don’t want to, right? Have a Corona.

American cinema must respond directly to what happens in our country. Direct missives, uneven as they often are, can be essential documents for survival in tense times. There are many works that deal with facets of the millennium so far in an indirect way, and the best of them—by Reichardt and Hittman—are brilliant. But these are “units of one,” and together we are stronger: simply being present, expressing “solidarity” in absolutely literal terms—physical proximity—is necessary for any kind of useful commentary to emerge. Otherwise, it’s more from the Human Torch or whatever about how dealing with death is hard. Yes. Yes it is. Where’s my camera?

—Follow Nicky Smith on Twitter: @nickyotissmith





Read also

UPDATED: Restructuring: Don’t vilify Southern Governors, Okowa warns Lawan

‘The Masked Singer’: Black Swan would be 3rd female winner in a row after Night Angel, Sun

‘Clown Show’: Biden’s CDC Chief Bashed After Saying ‘Evolving Science’ Caused Mask Guideline Update





News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro



Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here
News Every Day

Get Programming help from GotoAssignmentHelp’s Top Rated Assignment experts