Add news
Нами Накагава — Kimi Wa Kirameki/Ты - Сияние! (feat. Ichigo Tanuki)
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021April 2021
News Every Day |

Vermont lawmakers mull adding penalties for threats to state officials, employees

Vermont lawmakers mull adding penalties for threats to state officials, employees

MONTPELIER, Vt. (WFFF) — Vermont lawmakers are considering how to address the rise in threats directed at state employees and elected officials in recent years.

H.302, a bill currently under consideration, seeks to make the legal consequences of threatening a state employee much greater, but some believe bigger penalties wouldn't necessarily translate to fewer threats.

Multiple members of the House Judiciary Committee spoke about their personal experience with threats, or threats sent to close family members.

"Last year my family had to buy a home security system because of threats my wife received as president of the Rutland City School Board," said Rep. William Notte (D-Rutland).

"When my house was shot at this summer, state police came up and took a record of it, but it was 'well, you're a public official and people feel entitled to tell you how they feel," said Rep. Felisha Leffler (R-Franklin).

Leffler said she received an anonymous postcard in October, accusing her of "un-American" behavior and calling for her arrest. On Facebook, she posted a photo with the postcard and said she woke up to the sound of a gunshot from a vehicle driving by her house that morning.

As some lawmakers wonder if harsher punishment for those who send threats to state employees is the answer, others feel the same statutes that protect anyone who's threatened are solid enough.

"To me, why should I have a special category for myself because someone threatens me over a political thing. Why should I be considered special?" said Rep. Tom Burditt (R-Rutland).

On the other hand, several state reps in the House Judiciary Committee argued that imposing greater penalties isn't as much about protecting themselves as it is about making candidates feel safe.

"I can name four people in Rutland city who chose not to run for public office because my wife was threatened," Rep. Notte said. "These sort of threats directed at public officials are shaping our discourse, because they are not just potentially affecting the decisions of the officials who are threatened, but they are also convincing other people who want to serve their communities that its not safe for them to do so."

But then there's the other question—would any sort of extra penalty actually deter people from sending or making threats?

Assistant Attorney General David Scherr said the AG's office certainly wouldn't oppose the bill, but it'd likely only serve to send a message, at best.

"What is more likely in the long-run to do that is a multi-faceted approach that would do things like ensure bias-related incidents are being reported," Scherr said. "We have to do enforcement better, and I can't sit here right now and say to this committee that we have the answers on that, but that is the case."

Because discussions are still in the early stages, it's still an open-ended question what the tougher penalties would be. The same committee is also considering legislation for steeper penalties when it comes to threats involving firearms at a school.

Read also

Josh Hawley's latest attempt to rebrand himself is a sad 'joke': columnist

Man Utd & Real Madrid named as “ringleaders” as sources state Super League plans to give up on “legacy fans”

ACM Awards 2021: Luke Bryan wins Entertainer of the Year in absentia due to COVID-19, Maren Morris and Thomas Rhett also prevail

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here
News Every Day

Drakkar Klose injured, UFC Vegas 24 co-main vs. Jeremy Stephens cancelled