Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020
News Every Day |

The Jones settlement and its consequences

The Jones settlement and its consequences

A con game is afoot in Los Angeles. The City Council, or should we call it the City Con-cil, is currently pretending that forcing purportedly temporary homeless housing into parks and parking lots in residential neighborhoods will finally allow the city to clear the growing number of trash-strewn and unhealthful tent encampments from the sidewalks, streets and freeways.

It’s a lie, just as the 2007 settlement in Jones vs. Los Angeles was a lie.

The Jones settlement came out of a lawsuit by the ACLU challenging L.A. Municipal Code section 41.18(d), which stated, “No person shall sit, lie or sleep in or upon any street, sidewalk or other public way,” unless they were attending a parade. In that case, the U.S. Ninth Circuit ruled against the city, calling that ordinance, “one of the most restrictive municipal laws regulating public spaces in the United States.”

Instead of appealing that ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court and making the sensible argument that the city had a compelling reason for the law, city officials settled with the ACLU. The city agreed to stop enforcing the ban on sleeping on the sidewalks anywhere in Los Angeles between the hours of 9 p.m. and 6 a.m. until another 1,250 units of housing for the chronically homeless were constructed, including at least 625 in the downtown Skid Row area.

In return, the ACLU agreed that the Ninth Circuit ruling in the Jones case would not be a binding precedent in future cases.

And here’s how it turned out to be a two-pronged con game perpetrated against the people of Los Angeles: the city built the housing but never resumed enforcement of the ban on sidewalk-sleeping. And the promise that the Jones case would not be a binding precedent was rendered worthless when the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in a completely separate case, Martin v. Boise, and used all the reasoning from the Jones decision to rule that cities may not enforce a ban on public camping unless sufficient shelter beds are available.

The court didn’t give precise guidance on exactly how many shelter beds must be available, or where they must be located, or what sort of shelter meets the court’s standard. The judges also didn’t say cities had to allow public camping absolutely anywhere. There’s enough ambiguity in the decision to allow lawyers to sue a city over virtually any type of enforcement against tent encampments.

You’re living with the consequences of the reckless decision to settle the Jones case instead of appealing and fighting for a city’s power to maintain public health and safety. And now, they’re trying to sell this same con game to you again.

U.S. District Judge David Carter is overseeing a lawsuit filed by downtown business owners and residents against the city and county of Los Angeles. The lawsuit charges that officials have failed to provide housing for the homeless who are camping on the sidewalks. Carter has teased that there could be an agreement to allow enforcement of an anti-camping ordinance if enough housing is hurriedly found for the homeless.

With that non-binding non-promise in hand, L.A. City Council members are rushing to take over public parks, such as North Hollywood Park and Alexandria Park in North Hollywood, and public parking lots, such as the one behind the West Valley Municipal Building in Reseda, for “cabin communities,” housing for the homeless to be run by third-party non-profit organizations. There also are plans to purchase and convert hotel and motel properties for the same purpose. Even Skateland in Northridge, its business devastated by the government’s unending lockdown, could become full-service homeless housing.

The cost? We have no idea.

But we do know that the City Council has so far refused to pass an anti-camping ordinance, so there isn’t even a pretense that the city will ever take action to remove tent encampments from public spaces. And no agreement reached with Judge Carter is binding on the Ninth Circuit if different activists choose to sue the city to stop the enforcement of laws intended to protect public health and safety.

Just like the Jones settlement, this is a monstrous bait-and-switch that will open a vein and bleed the city budget. Don’t be conned into believing otherwise.

Susan Shelley is an editorial writer and columnist for the Southern California News Group. Susan@SusanShelley.com. Twitter: @Susan_Shelley




Read also

Why office morale will be hard to maintain this year

Strictly create adult babygrow for JJ Chalmers to stop him flashing viewers in his kilt

A 1976 Battle Over a Disputed Tree Almost Started the Second Korean War



News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro




Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here