Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020
News Every Day |

Why Joe Biden Might Be Able to Negotiate With North Korea

Mitchell Lerner

Joe Biden, Asia

A return to high tensions is not at all set in stone.

It is hard to imagine a less propitious environment for successful policymaking than the one that will likely greet President Joe Biden when he enters the White House on January 20, 2021. The nation’s economy is suffering. Coronavirus deaths are spiking. Racial tensions are exploding. Ugly partisanship characterizes both the political system and the national mood. And soon after inauguration, President Biden can expect another troubling item to land on his “to-do” list: North Korea.

Most signs suggest that North Korea is a fairly low priority for the incoming administration. Instead, its focus is clear: economic recovery; the coronavirus; race relations; and climate change. North Korea, however, doesn’t like to be ignored. A few months after President Obama’s 2009 inauguration, North Korea tested a multi-stage rocket over the Pacific and shortly thereafter detonated a small nuclear device. President Trump received a similar greeting, including the North’s first test of its Hwasong-14 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on July 4. The North also has a long history of striking out in foreign policy during times of internal distress, as a means to rally the people behind the Kim family. With America’s current international standing damaged by four years of President Trump’s strategic incoherence and the new administration clearly focus on more immediate domestic matters, Pyongyang has an even freer hand than it has sometimes had in the past. Now North Korea is preparing to engage with a president who has compared Kim Jong-un to Adolf Hitler and who, in return, has been denigrated by North Korean state media as “an imbecile bereft of elementary quality as a human being,” and a “rabid dog [that] must be beaten to death with a stick.” One certainly expects, then, that something will emerge from Pyongyang in early 2021 other than another “very beautiful letter.”

Yet, as that famous strategic thinker Peter Parker might have said, with small provocation sometimes comes small opportunity. Although the North has a range of possible actions at its disposal to test the incoming administration, a moderate course seems most likely, perhaps an ICBM test over the Pacific or another series of short-range missile launches. Direct provocation against the South or Japan or another nuclear test would likely involve more risk than Kim wants in these unstable times. North Korea has hardly been left unscathed by the turmoil of 2020, with party leadership even admitting in August to “severe internal and external situations and unexpected manifold challenges.” Accordingly, Kim seems to have his government focused on responding to the coronavirus, the economy, and the natural disasters that have marked the past year. Kim, like Biden, would thus benefit from some stability over the next few years. Meanwhile, the North’s relationship with China seems to be on the upswing while Sino-American relations are at a low point, so any action from Pyongyang that is too provocative risks significantly impairing that important relationship as well.

In fact, circumstances suggest that the early months of a Biden administration might be ripe for the first steps of a U.S.-North Korean rapprochement. For all of his shortcomings in North Korean policy, Trump did kick open the door and take some rather boisterous first steps through it. The precedent of direct engagement at the highest levels has thus been established, and although it came much earlier in the negotiating process than was probably warranted, it allows the Biden team to claim to be just picking up the baton where they found it and dive into quiet negotiations immediately. Engagement with the North would also be a step towards placating the demands of the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party that is tired of America’s “forever wars.” South Korean President Moon Jae-in has staked much of his reputation on stabilizing relations with the North, so he is likely to support any such diplomatic effort. And Kim can reasonably claim to have obtained what he needed from the Trump years, as he successfully increased his international and domestic standing through the direct talks; poked holes in the sanctions regime, and bought time for significant advances in the nation’s weapons capabilities that strengthened both its domestic prestige and its international deterrent. Simply put, no one benefits from a return to the hostility of the past.

Biden hardly seems likely to offer a dramatic gesture of reconciliation at the start of his administration. Indeed, under “normal” circumstances, the new president seems likely to respond to any perceived North Korean offense with a return to the same policies of the past. But, there are not normal times. Constraints on both sides abound. Domestic interests are paramount. The international environment is unlike that at any time since the end of World War II. There is a very recent precedent for direct talks, and a South Korean government and a U.S. domestic environment that is in strong support. Biden himself has spoken of a need to end “forever wars” and a desire to redirect American power to meet twenty-first-century challenges like climate change. Under these circumstances, the opportunity for a breakthrough may be at its highest point in decades. How the Biden team responds to a likely North Korean test in early 2021 may be decisive. A calm and reasonable response to what will likely be a fairly mild provocation might just prove to be a significant step on the admittedly difficult path towards progress. A hawkish response likely means a return to the same rigid stalemate that has marked a half-century of difficult U.S.-North Korean relations.

Mitch Lerner is Professor of History and Director of the East Asian Studies Center at The Ohio State University. He is also associate editor of the Journal of American-East Asian Relations.

Image: Reuters

Read also

Teacher wins 2-year, rent-free lease in Kansas City luxury apartment

Pelosi optimistic, says momentum growing for COVID-19 relief

'Do they even watch football?!' Fans BEMUSED as Barcelona wax museum rolls out UNCONVINCING Lionel Messi waxwork

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here