Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020
1234567
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Tax Hikes Put Biden Between the Economy and Politics

No Biden proposal is more forgotten than his multi-trillion tax hike. Soon, America’s coronavirus recession will change that. Biden will be forced to choose between an enormous economic hit to the nation’s weakened economy or a huge political hit to his precarious liberal base.

The American Enterprise Institute’s recent estimate of Biden’s tax proposals confirmed what others have found: They are enormous. Cumulatively, they would “raise federal revenue by $3.8 trillion [Tax Policy Center estimated them at $4 trillion] over the next decade (2021-30)” and include “several individual income, payroll, and business tax increases.” Although aimed at primarily high-income households, the proposals “would increase taxes, on average, for households at every income level.”

Many Democrats now see increased taxes as more a desired good than a necessary evil.

Their enormity and transparency are presidentially unprecedented. Historically, candidates have run from tax increases — instead seeking to tar their opponent with them — not on them. Since Democrat George McGovern’s 1972 fiasco, being a tax-and-spend liberal was a presidential hopeful’s shorthand suicide note.

Two generations later, times have changed indeed, and Biden has rushed to keep up with their leftward lurch. His almost $4 trillion is easily the largest proposed tax hike in campaigning history. (For comparison, Biden’s increase equates to $380 billion annually — the U.S. did not exceed total annual federal revenue of $380 billion until 1978.)

As AEI points out, Biden’s campaign depends on this revenue because it is “aimed at financing new government programs.” Biden is no less dependent on these increases rhetorically: Politically, he must offset his long establishment background to appeal to the Democrats’ restive leftward base.

Assembled in 2019 and amended since, Biden’s tax and spending proposals have continually grown to appease the collective Left that now attracts the Democrats’ majority support. Even closing on the nomination, Biden kept promising his way through the tape; his spending proposals got richer and his tax hikes higher.

Of course, that was then; coronavirus is now, and the economy is supine. Biden’s promises, which were in step with the Democrats’ ideology, is now out of step with America’s economy. Robust before coronavirus, the economy has been hammered. In quarter one, it shrank 5 percent; quarter two certainly will be significantly worse.

Washington’s response has been to bolster the economy with significant resources. Adding federal spending and Federal Reserve efforts, almost $8.5 trillion has been committed. Biden’s tax hike proposals would throw that into reverse. It would also be the reverse of President Obama’s choice.

Entering office, Obama faced the Great Recession. In 2009’s first quarter, the economy shrank 4.4 percent and another 0.6 percent in the second. Even with the economy recovering in 2009’s second half and through 2010, Obama extended the expiring Bush tax cuts in their totality — including those for high earners.

Obama later raised taxes with Obamacare and ended the Bush tax cuts for top earners. But even combined, these were just a fraction of Biden’s current proposal.

Overlooked is Biden’s emergent predicament: He is fiscally dependent on his tax hikes’ revenue and electorally dependent on their rhetorical value.

Neither the country nor Congress is likely to accept massive new un-offset federal spending following 2020’s still-growing tab. The economy remains well below pre-virus levels, and regaining those levels will take a long time.

Faced with a much less weakened economy, Obama, in whose administration Biden was vice president, balked at more taxes early. Obama knew that any further economic relapse would be attributed to any such tax hike. Based on the twin magnitudes of today’s economic contraction and his proposed tax hikes, Biden’s exposure would be even greater.

Contrastingly, the Left wants tax hikes more for ideological than fiscal purposes. Liberals’ desire for increased taxes’ redistributive effect underscores the Democrats’ significant drift these last 12 years. Many Democrats now see them as more a desired good than a necessary evil. Biden particularly needs them for this purpose — to offset the establishment aftertaste he leaves in liberals’ mouths. Biden needs liberals motivated for November, so backing off taxing the rich would not be helpful.

When campaigning reconvenes in earnest, Biden will have to choose between the economic and the political. Obama didn’t face the same predicament when he chose the economy. Of course, Obama was Obama, which Biden definitely is not. Obama’s base was large and solid. Biden’s is neither.

Seemingly the Democrats’ ideal, in reality Obama was the moderates’ ideal Democrat. Moderates particularly hang in the balance on Biden’s decision. Biden has much to prove to moderates and his left. Nowhere is that clearer than on taxes and the economy, and nowhere does he have less room to maneuver.

J. T. Young served under President George W. Bush as the director of communications in the Office of Management and Budget and as deputy assistant secretary in legislative affairs for tax and budget at the Treasury Department. He served as a congressional staffer from 1987 through 2000.



Read also

You Tube Gold: Kareem vs. Walton

TikTok is withdrawing its app from Hong Kong as tech reckons with new security law

Language law applies only to Ukrainian, not Russian or other languages of minorities – president's rep in Constitutional Court



News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro




Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here