Duke Law's alleged race-based admissions accused of defying Supreme Court ruling: DOJ
The Justice Department is accusing Duke University School of Law of favoring Black and Hispanic applicants over White and Asian applicants with the same academic records in its admissions process, which the Trump administration argues the law school used to meet its "diversity goals."
"Duke Law School doesn’t get a free pass to discriminate against white and Asian students simply because it thinks it has good intentions," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said.
In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA) that it was unconstitutional for colleges and higher education institutions to consider a student's race in their admissions processes. The decision prompted the Trump administration to open investigations into alleged race-based discrimination at dozens of colleges and universities.
The Civil Rights Division, which began investigating Duke Law in April 2025, found that Black applicants who applied in 2025 had roughly 3.5 times the chance of admission as Asian applicants with the same academic credentials, according to a Justice Department letter sent to Duke Law. Investigators found that the median LSAT score for accepted Black applicants was lower than the median score for rejected Asian and White applicants.
"This consistent difference in the test scores between students of different racial groups is substantial and cannot be explained by a coincidence," the letter stated. "The magnitude and durability of these preferences across multiple cycles (including post-SFFA) confirm intentional discrimination."
The Trump administration’s review of internal communications found that the law school began preparing for the Supreme Court’s SFFA ruling so its admissions process could continue "to meet the Law School's goals for a broadly diverse student body."
For instance, Duke Law's post-SFFA guidance for admissions allowed officials to "consider applicants' discussion of how race affected their life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise." Applicants provided these discussions in short-answer essays, where admissions officials could then "tag" the responses to provide context for weaker academic records when evaluating applicants.
COAST GUARD ENDING RACE-BASED ADMISSIONS FOR OFFICER COMMISSIONING PROGRAM UNDER TRUMP DEI CRACKDOWN
Duke Law states that it values "students with a wide range of experiences, backgrounds, and interests that may not be directly related to their legal ambitions," encouraging applicants to "highlight different elements" of who they are.
"Using ‘diversity’ essay questions to identify preferred races for admission is still illegal discrimination based on race, and this Department is committed to eliminating it everywhere we find it, including in our nation’s law schools," Dhillon said in a statement.
After SFFA, Duke Law admissions continued to release reports highlighting the school's diversity and its efforts to achieve "race-neutral" admissions standards. In a May 2024 annual review, the associate dean of admissions highlighted the diversity of the incoming fall 2023 class, including the number of Latino, Black and Asian or Asian American students.
In the school's 2025 Annual Review Memorandum, the admissions dean suggested that the law school can gauge the diversity of its student body by observing students on campus rather than compiling formal statistics.
SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER
A Duke University spokesperson told Fox News Digital that the university is aware of the Justice Department's allegations.
"The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division issued a letter of findings related to Duke Law’s admissions practices. We are reviewing the letter and its conclusions carefully. Duke is committed to complying with the law and will continue to do so in a manner that is consistent with our academic mission," a Duke University spokesperson said.
Fox News Digital reached out to the Justice Department for additional comment.