Tech is now rolling out the old grievance grift

OPINION Twice this week we've been told by our would-be tech oligarchs that people are being paid to hate them. Alex Karp said 10 percent of the world professionally hates Palantir and Kevin O’Leary said paid agitators were protesting his Utah data center. This is the familiar language we hear in politics when someone needs a ready scapegoat to explain away unpopularity. We should pay attention to this argument as it transfers from politics to technology, because it is revealing the alleged victims' intent. They have done, and are going to do, some very unpopular things and, when people push back, those complaints need to be quickly marginalized. Just like in a mob trial when the defense lawyer tells the court what the rat is getting from the government to squeal, calling people paid agitators or professional haters invites us to question their motives. Just when we are shocked by Karp's audacity, saying that he doesn't care if the Iran war is unpopular and that Palantir will support it, with the next breath, he tells us to check the pockets of the people picketing. Just when the public stirs and demands to know why a Shark Tank star wants to gobble up all the electricity and water in a state, he says the only green initiative they care about is in their wallet. It's also a dog whistle to those like-minded souls who hunger for enemies and grievance, that even a simple billionaire – doing nothing wrong other than selling software that helps the government select targets to bomb – can be picked on by people that hate America. It lets their compatriots in Podcastistan know how to feel and where to stand if they want to be on the right side of the argument. Are you pro-Iran nuclear weapons blowing up Christian orphanages? Or are you going to be nice to Alex Karp? Are you in favor of being a boss and not even looking at the electricity bill, just sliding your titanium card across the meter like a baller? Or are you going to whine that the data center uses more electricity than everything that is plugged into an electrical outlet in the state of Utah? It makes the argument simple, not for everyone, but for just enough. For the loudest, the angriest, and the most ... patriotic. As those voices rise, reason gets drowned out. The debate gets confused and crucially, people move on. At this moment, the public's attention is fractured and emotions are spent. Focusing outrage on anything complex is next to impossible when there are so many unambiguous abuses of power. All you need to do is muddy the waters a bit and let them swim away. Anyone who sticks around? They're probably getting paid to do it. Getting paid is what this is all about after all. In the last 90 days, Palantir got $858 million from working on unpopular wars with unpopular governments. I mean look, like they say, it was all done to protect the ideal of western liberal democracies, of course. Nothing says you understand the teaching of democracy better than ignoring how the public feels when the warlord is jingling his purse. Why should haters be the only ones getting paid? When we published Karp’s comments about 10 percent professionally hating Palantir, savvy readers at The Register showed they are on to the grift. “I mean, it's the wording itself — 10% “professionally” hates Palantir," wrote commenter Pulled Tea. "Could be right! Bet you many of the people who are doing the hating are dedicated, high-level amateurs." ®