Let’s Straighten It Out Spurs
Contemporary top-level football is complex. Double pivots, inverted full-backs, gegenpressing, I’ve banned the expression A***ball but that too – I get it. But it’s not overly simplistic to say, at free kicks, get your big bloke on their big bloke. Or don’t get too many players upfield and let teams score on the counter. Or defend a bloody corner properly. And when we have a problem defending set-pieces, don’t give stupid free-kicks away.
What infuriates me are all these mug goals. We are total mugs, handing opportunities to opponents instead of making them work hard for them. Regardless of different tactical approaches, think of how many of the goals we’ve conceded lately are mug goals. Sitting in the Park Lane on Sunday, watching their players’ expressions as they celebrated their goals, they couldn’t believe their luck. Without playing well they held us in check but to score their goals required scant ingenuity or overpowering skill. On Thursday, three unnecessary tackles, three fouls, two goals.
And underlying those fouls is a sense of indecision laced with a liberal dash of panic. Minds as well as limbs are weary after a season of hard yards and tough matches. Nobody took control. Nobody settled things down. Nobody said, let’s be confident in our ability to resist when CFC attack, let’s keep our shape and keep the ball when we get it. Nobody assessed what was happening on the field and said, oi big bloke, get out there to mark that other big bloke. There are no gamechangers out there.
As a fan, I ask for, indeed demand, clarity of thought from players and manager, yet I find that impossible because of my attachment to the club. There’s so much to say, so many things going wrong lately, there’s disappointment and some anger obscuring the progress this season. Perspective is hard when you’re so invested.
Ange has the right ideas, the right approach and – this is important for me – the right values. He understands the club’s heritage and what supporters want. It’s a philosophy that can change the ethos of the entire club and he has the capacity to get people to believe.
But now we’re at the sharp end of the season, time to take stock and do the accounts. And once more we’re ending a season wanting it to rush by and end before its time. Different players, different manager but that same sinking feeling.
The biggest, perhaps insurmountable problem Ange faces won’t go away. The weight of expectation has become a burden, as his predecessor discovered and ran away. If anything, he’s added to it because he created such an exciting start to his time in charge, because he was so different from what had gone before.
We fans carry this too. Lately, it seems like each overhit pass carries not only too much weight but also the weight of past frustrations. As each cross sails into the distance, it becomes a symbol of serial failure. Not again, we lament, not again.
Save Our Seniors is the fan campaign to reverse the club’s decision to cut the discount on senior concessions and to not issue any more senior concessions after next season. It’s a disgraceful decision that directly affects not only the club’s most loyal supporters but also reveals how little the club values the loyalty of every fan. The campaign continues – updates on social media @SaveOurSenior66 and I wrote about it last time
So of the many things on my mind, a short list in no particular order.
Key players have disappointed in the second half of the season. Maddison is easily drawn into petty squabbles that distract him. If he wants to be a big player at a big club then he’s got to play like one and run the midfield, rather than be a bit part actor however scene-stealing his cameos are. Bentacur too is off his game, Bissouma is not a strong presence in that key centre mid role, while Sonny gave everything in the Asian Cup, as he should for his country, but he has little left for us.
That said, modern players expect to be coached into a system. I can’t escape the felling that too often our midfielders are not clear where they are supposed to be. They allow huge gaps to open up between them and don’t get this coaching fundamental about connection and awareness. And some of that has to be down to the manager.
I read that Ange has no plan B. While this was never truly accurate, we’ve seen plans B and C this week and neither has made a significant difference to the outcome. To me, the defeat to CFC was the worst of the lot precisely because we changed our set-up to be tighter out of possession and still the Blues easily circumvented our defence. And substituting the complete midfield smacked of desperation rather than a clear plan of action.
Compare with Them Lot up the road – I’m afraid we were forced to on Sunday – they’ve had several years of gradual development and are clearly well-drilled out of possession. They close down space and passing lanes. For a couple of minutes last Sunday, I watched Rice in defence – there was nothing much else to catch my attention. He’s constantly on the move even when in a relatively tight defensive situation, proactively thinking about space and angles. As for us in this respect, let’s just say we have much to learn. And also remember, it took them years and a lot of money to be where they are.
I’ve got to say something about corners. Vicario looks uncertain when earlier in the season I felt he was good at this aspect of his game, given that he doesn’t possess huge physical presence. But it’s wrong to focus all the attention on him. A firm low-ish ball around the packed 6-yard box is a favourite for many clubs at the moment. A lot of keepers have a problem with these. They simply do not have the time let alone the space to get to these crosses.
We don’t defend as a team in these situations. We have no presence at the near post, another reason to miss Harry as he was so effective there. We’re not a big side, and our smaller guys employed to do the blocking as part of the zonal set-up aren’t strong enough and are easily overpowered. Romero and VDV have many attributes but a standing jump without much of a run-up is not one of them. And every other team has at least one player to protect the keeper. We didn’t. Then we did. On Sunday, we didn’t again and gave two goals away at corners. Then we did in the second half when it was too late.
Mug goals, mug tactics. How on earth can we be so disorganised, so weak, so consistently. We adapted with a man to protect Vic, then on Sunday we left him exposed. I simply don’t get it. Admit it, it’s not just me who thinks, what’s the point, heart in mouth time every corner and free kick.
The same can be said for allowing teams to score so easily on the break, a regular feature of recent matches. Attention has focussed on the abilities or lack thereof of individuals – VDV against Newcastle, Davies on Sunday. But isolating a defender, any defender in the world, against a quick skilful forward is the stuff managers’ dreams are made of. Saka didn’t have to beat Davies, all he had to do was pull the ball across him because we left Davies unsupported. Again.
Anyway, that’s got that off my chest. Nobody said the rebuild would be easy. Ange made it appear it was with such a stunning opening to the season. In fact without going over this all again, it will take time, determination and clear thinking to turn around problems embedded in the club psyche, let alone our transfer policy.
Overall this season, we’re up a few points. We’re shite but 5th, a reasonable foundation to build upon. We know what the manager wants, and we all know from personal experience that we can learn from mistakes as well as successes. The question is, how willing is Ange to adapt? We are too open in midfield out of possession and rubbish at defending set-pieces, so two areas there where little apparent change has taken place despite strong reasons to act.
On the other hand, we forget how relatively inexperienced many of our players are, this is a the first season with a new manager and his very different ways. And we’ve not replaced Harry. Also, and I may be reading too much into this, but against both AFC and CFC, he altered tactics, certainly on Thursday out of possession we looked very different.
On Thursday, Ange was visibly furious at players who were not doing what they should, and yesterday’s press conference he declared, “We need change. Change has to happen.” Good. The question as always is, does the board agree with his plans? Past experience not only casts doubt over this but also tells us that the chairman does not react well to public criticism, overt or implied. Shots fired.