We in Telegram
Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024
1 2 3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Trump Vows to Crush the Civil Service, But He’s Not the First President to Try

Donald Trump vows to root out the uncooperative public servants who constrained his first term and replace them with loyalists. “Either the deep state destroys America, or we destroy the deep state,” he told rallygoers in March last year. Bringing the sprawling federal bureaucracy to heel is necessary if he’s to realize his agenda: shutting down the southern border, building “vast holding facilities” for migrants facing deportation, and prosecuting his political enemies.

Under current law, the vast majority of the 2.1 million-member federal workforce are “career” civil servants. The president can only fill about 4,000 political appointment positions across the federal bureaucracy. The rest serve in their role regardless of who occupies the White House and cannot be fired for political reasons. To “restore government that is controlled by the people,” as Trump put it, he plans to bring back “Schedule F,” an executive order he issued in the waning days of his first term that Joe Biden rescinded before it could go into effect. Trump officials planned to use Schedule F to convert as many as two-thirds of protected civil servants into political appointees who could be fired and replaced by executive fiat. Out with the nonpartisan experts loyal to the law; in with the cronies loyal to Trump.

Under the early spoils system of the American government, jobs were awarded based on loyalty to a party or president rather than qualifications. The system was eradicated after aspiring diplomat Charles Guiteau shot and killed newly-elected President James Garfield in July 1881 for the slight of refusing Guiteau a consulship in Europe. (Guiteau had played a small role in getting him elected and felt entitled to a prominent position in government.) In response, Garfield’s successor, Chester A. Arthur, enacted the Pendleton Act of 1883, which mandated that federal positions be granted based on merit instead of patronage, and the federal civil service was born. By 1909, merit-based appointments constituted two-thirds of the federal workforce.

Schedule F could functionally restore the old spoils system. A federal bureaucracy loyal to Trump would give him unprecedented power over the government, including the Department of Justice, the Internal Revenue Service, and other departments and agencies historically run with minimal political interference. And unlike four years ago, Trump now benefits from a reserve corps of loyalists ready to fill the tens of thousands of would-be government vacancies. Right-wing groups like the Heritage Foundation are pouring millions of dollars into building databases of recruits and training programs to prepare them for loyal service.

These plans may sound like the fevered scheming of a singularly authoritarian leader and his cultish supporters. But such plans have a long history in the conservative movement. If Trump succeeds, it will be the realization of the Republican Party’s decades-long crusade to seize control of the civil service.


Richard Nixon intensely distrusted the permanent government when he entered the Oval Office in 1969. The former representative, senator, and vice president fretted to his staff about liberal bias among civil servants and fumed about the supposed “Jewish cabal” of “liberals” and “academics” in government undermining his authority.

So began a secretive political purge. Civil servants deemed untrustworthy were reassigned to obscure roles and replaced by loyalists. The purge was led by the late Nixon aide Fred Malek, who suggested in a memo later obtained by investigative journalist Jack Anderson that they “stop calling it ‘politicizing the executive branch’ and, instead, call it something like strengthening the government’s responsiveness.” That gave the program its euphemistic title: the Responsiveness Program. (For his many revelations about the administration’s misdeeds, Anderson was the target of a failed assassination plot ordered by Nixon in 1972.)

The Responsiveness Program was, for a time, successful. Under pressure from White House Counsel John Dean, the IRS began hounding Nixon’s political enemies with tax audits. The Small Business Administration awarded grants to Nixon’s friends. The Central Intelligence Agency kept at least one of the president’s enemies under illegal surveillance.

But other attempts to strong-arm federal agencies went nowhere—a telling sign of the resilience of civil service norms. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover was an unlikely “bulwark against the president’s attempts to politicize and undermine the federal bureaucracy,” as his biographer Beverly Gage wrote. Not exactly a grand champion of civil liberties, Hoover nevertheless rejected Nixon’s insistence that the FBI further expand surveillance of civil rights and anti-war protesters beyond its already substantial forays into that area.

Watergate ended Nixon’s political career and his efforts to politicize federal agencies. “If he had been able to pull it off, it would have amounted to almost a coup against our existing form of government,” Anderson wrote. Evidence of the lawbreaking Responsiveness Program came to light in 1977, when Democrats took control of the Civil Service Commission, the agency responsible for protecting civil service workers (later replaced by today’s Office of Personnel Management), and uncovered evidence of this “Little Watergate.”

When Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980, the fledgling Heritage Foundation issued its first “Mandate for Leadership”—a precursor to the organization’s “Project 2025” plan for the Trump administration. The paper did not go so far as to recommend the mass elimination of civil service protections the way “Project 2025” would. Still, it laid out a novel vision for downsizing government and aligning the federal bureaucracy with conservative goals.

With “Mandate for Leadership” as his governing blueprint, Reagan took unprecedented steps to ensure ideological conformity across his administration. “I will not accept the supposed ‘wisdom’ which has it that the federal bureaucracy has become so powerful that it can no longer be changed or controlled by any administration,” he declared.

The Reagan administration empowered political appointees to use all means to overrule and subvert the government’s career civil servants. “With personnel actions sometimes subtle and sometimes overt, it has put out a message that it expects ideological loyalty at the high levels of career service,” the Washington Post reported in 1983. “The political appointees, moreover, have brought a missionary zeal to their task, figuring that they have 50 years of history to reverse.”

Some examples: At the Department of the Interior, Secretary James G. Watt fired 28 career lawyers who opposed the development of natural resources under the flimsy pretense of budgetary cutbacks. When openings in the legal office soon opened up and one of the lawyers, Derb Carter, reapplied for his job, he was questioned about his political beliefs, which violated Civil Service rules.

At OSHA, Dr. Peter F. Infante, the head of its Office of Carcinogen Classification, was almost fired by OSHA’s administrator, Thorne G. Auchter, after the industry-backed Formaldehyde Institute complained to Auchter that Infante had publicly disputed a government finding that there was insufficient evidence to call formaldehyde a carcinogen. (When Congress caught wind of the plan to fire Infante, Auchter backed off.)

At the EPA, Dr. Adrian Gross, the chief of the toxicology branch in the Hazard Evaluation Division, was transferred to an obscure post after Gross accused his superiors of improperly helping two chemical companies register an insecticide called permethrin that Gross said was a carcinogen.

Similar episodes played out at the Department of Energy, the Merit System Protection Board, and elsewhere.

In 2001, the Heritage Foundation issued a policy paper, “Taking Charge of Federal Personnel,” that warned George W. Bush’s incoming administration of the “immense power and political sophistication of the federal employee network and its allies and the intensity of its resistance to serious change” and implored Bush to take “managerial control of government” even further.

 Bush did just that. The Texan led “a crusade to replace expert judgment in federal agencies with political calculation, to marginalize or eliminate longtime civil servants, to change laws without going through Congress, to silence dissenting views within the government, and to centralize decision-making in the White House,” a report from the magazine Government Executive found.

Bush empowered partisan appointees to stack the civil service with loyalists. At the State Department, one high-ranked appointee listed loyalty to Bush as a job requirement for a weapons of mass destruction program. A Pentagon appointee selected candidates for Iraq reconstruction assignments based on whether they’d voted for the president, effectively putting a team of young, underqualified partisans in charge of essential elements of Iraqi reconstruction. A Justice Department appointee screened applicants by running their names and keywords such as “guns,” “abortion,” and “Florida recount” through search engines to assess their feelings about those issues and identify “good Americans.”

Career experts at the CDC, EPA, NASA, and other agencies were cowed into silence by their partisan superiors. For example, when the chief Medicare actuary, Richard Foster, was preparing to issue a warning to Congress that proposed prescription drug reforms could cost more than the White House acknowledged, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Thomas A. Scully, a political appointee, threatened to fire him.

Others quit. The Washington Post reported that a “brain drain” of career experts at FEMA meant private sector contractors took over much of the disaster response and even policymaking. As a result, when Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in 2005, the agency was caught unprepared and mounted a gravely inadequate response.

In 2016, Trump ran a similar playbook. The Heritage Foundation staffed his administration with thousands of recruits, and his deputies in the federal agencies routinely marginalized dissident officials with reassignments and demotions.

But veteran officials often publicly rebuked his agenda. Trump was infuriated by civil servants like scientist Anthony Fauci, who issued sober, unflattering reports on the spread of Covid; Sally Yates, a DOJ attorney who refused to enforce Trump’s “Muslim ban” order; and Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official who testified in Trump’s impeachment inquiry. “Somebody said, President, what’s the toughest country to deal with? Is it Russia? Is it China? Is it North Korea?” Trump told attendees of a fundraiser in the final weeks of his first term, the day after he issued his last-gasp Schedule F order. “No, the toughest country by far is dealing with the United States.”


 A half-century of Republican—and sometimes Democratic—ridicule of “big government” has chipped away at the efficacy of the federal bureaucracy. For decades, the size of the federal workforce has not kept pace with the growth of the U.S. population. As Paul Glastris and Don Kettl reported in the Monthly, overstretched agencies like the IRS and the CMS have increasingly come to rely on private contractors, who are less accountable and less effective than civil servants. Contractors working for the federal government today outnumber civil servants at a rate of more than two to one.

But despite Republican efforts to overpower the federal bureaucracy, it remains largely nonpartisan and professional. Will that finally change if Trump retakes office?

Maybe. More than ever, the Heritage Foundation and other conservative groups are “laser-focused on the staffing challenge,” as former Trump official Troup Hemenway, the President of Personnel Policy and a founder of the Association of Republican Presidential Appointees, put it. Heritage alone has poured $22 million into the effort. Plus, a second-term Trump could enjoy advantages in legal disputes that other Republican presidents did not. Members of the conservative Supreme Court supermajority have often expressed doubt about federal agencies, suggesting they might be inclined to sympathize with Trump’s argument that the federal bureaucracy needs to be constrained.

Another advantage is that Trump may not need to replace nonpartisan civil servants at all because private contractors now do so much of their work. Paving a lane for his agenda may be as much a matter of shifting certain contracts to loyalists. During his first term, he showed no scruples about doing so on a smaller scale: Companies or individuals with ties to Trump were awarded contracts to provide “strategic services” at the CMS and build portions of the southern border wall.

But a dramatic takeover of government is an uphill battle, and one Democrats are taking seriously. The Biden administration just finalized rules to guard against Schedule F. The rules guarantee that career employees who are reclassified as political appointees can retain their civil service protections. And Trump is capricious and distractible. It’s just as likely he’ll throw out Heritage’s carefully plotted plan as he’ll adopt it.

What’s more, past presidents’ progress toward taking control of the federal bureaucracy was often kneecapped by scandal and incompetence. If he wins a second term, the most scandal-prone and incompetent president in living memory could prove the exception. But the civil service has survived more disciplined political attacks than he’s likely capable of. Jack Anderson wrote that Nixon “found out that a seething enterprise like the federal government could not be compartmentalized, cordoned off and led from a glass bubble.” That’s as true today as it was in 1974.

The post Trump Vows to Crush the Civil Service, But He’s Not the First President to Try appeared first on Washington Monthly.

Москва

Эксперт Президентской академии в Санкт-Петербурге о развитии социально-экономического потенциала территорий России

Online Alarm Clock for efficient time management

Tom Aspinall says UFC 304 start time is ‘awful’ and should be changed as Brit provides update on next opponent

Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk undercard: Who is fighting on huge Saudi bill?

5 Things To Remember When A Friendship Ends

Ria.city






Read also

‘It’s not going to get us to go away’: Car salesman shares how to get salespeople to leave you alone—and it’s not by saying ‘I’m just looking’

Yoshiki Takei aims to complete his transition from K1 to boxing against Jason Moloney

Quartz Word Publishers: Defining Tomorrow's Stories

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

News Every Day

Online Alarm Clock for efficient time management

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here


News Every Day

Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk undercard: Who is fighting on huge Saudi bill?



Sports today


Новости тенниса
Елена Рыбакина

"Я играю и зарабатываю хорошие деньги, но...". Рыбакина назвала главную проблему в женском теннисе



Спорт в России и мире
Москва

«Кубок футбольных мам» прошел на стадионе «Москвич» в Лобне



All sports news today





Sports in Russia today

Москва

Росгвардейцы обеспечили безопасность во время футбольного матча в Москве


Новости России

Game News

Бета-тест Figment 2: Creed Valley на iOS открыли для 100 человек


Russian.city


Происшествия

Росгвардейцы обеспечили безопасность во время футбольного матча в Москве


Губернаторы России
Культура

Цирковая артистка Бурятии Аригма Цыремпилова - девочка-каучук (Россия, Культура, Театр и Дети)


Суд присяжных частично оправдал протаранившего ворота посольства РФ в Дублине

С ощущением ноющей роли. Актрисы, у которых не случилось блестящего будущего

Россия и Дети: театр кукол Ульгэр в Бурятии покажет концерт-представление "Вальс Победы"

Южный отток: что происходит с таджикскими мигрантами в России


Концерт дома детского творчества

На Улан-Удэнском ЛВРЗ завершился весенний этап акции «Неделя без турникетов»

Сын Оксаны Самойловой и Джигана пожаловался на поведение старших сестер: забавное видео

Голос на исходе // Bon Jovi отметили 40-летие фильмом о себе


Увидит ли Париж Мирру из России? Андреева дает жару в Мадриде и включается в олимпийскую гонку

Медведев сыграет с Бубликом в Мадриде 

«У меня больше нет сил бороться». Елена Рыбакина раскритиковала WTA

Павлюченкова и Потапова не смогли выйти в финал турнира WTA в Мадриде в парном разряде



Форум Доноров представил результаты первой лаборатории проекта «Музеи и меценаты»

Производственные площадки АО «Желдорреммаш» в апреле посетило более 4700 школьников и студентов

«Страна забытых сказок» в «Геликон-опере». Детское радио приглашает

Работники СЛД «Узловая» филиала «Московский» ООО «ЛокоТех-Сервис» приняли участие региональном этапе «Время молодых. Работники»


Российская империя в фото 40

Операция "Кольцо" 33 года спустя: Государственный терроризм на территории Республики Армения

Бизнес-центр самоперестроился // Московские власти против внезапно возникающих апартаментов

Учащиеся класса Росгвардии приняли участие в военно-патриотической игре "Зарница 2.0" в Зеленогорске


Льготы льготами, но эти четыре налога в 2024 году пенсионеры заплатят без вопросов

Присяжные частично оправдали протаранившего ворота посольства РФ в Дублине мужчину

Диана Гурцкая показала на фото, как ее муж выглядел перед смертью в самолете

Более 5 тыс писем написали школьники Химок для бойцов СВО



Путин в России и мире






Персональные новости Russian.city
Бато Багдаев

Россия и Дети: театр кукол Ульгэр в Бурятии покажет концерт-представление "Вальс Победы"



News Every Day

Online Alarm Clock for efficient time management




Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости