White House budget reveals Trump admin's push to label political opposition 'terrorism'

Along with cutting environmental, housing, and health programs and proposing an increase of nearly $500 billion in military spending, President Donald Trump’s new budget proposal shows how the White House “wants to use taxpayer dollars to spy on those who oppose its extremist agenda,” one Democratic congresswoman said Monday evening.

Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Penn.) was referring to the budget’s description of a new FBI center that is already working to root out what the White House broadly defined as “domestic terrorism” in a federal memo last year.

As independent journalist Ken Klippenstein wrote this week, buried in Trump’s budget request—which includes $12.5 billion for the FBI to invest in counterterrorism efforts and other spending—is the White House’s latest assertion that “domestic terrorists... pose an elevated threat to the Homeland.”

“In recent years, heinous assassinations and other acts of political violence in the United States have dramatically increased,” reads the budget’s section on domestic terrorism. “Commonly, this violent conduct relates to views associated with anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the US government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility to those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and mortality.”

The views described echo National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), the memo signed last September that directed federal agencies to develop a national strategy to “investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence” in order to stop violent attacks before they happen.

But despite the administration’s singular focus on groups and individuals who hold left-wing, anti-capitalism views and subscribe to belief systems other than Christianity, the National Institute of Justice found that since 1990, 227 attacks motivated by right-wing views killed 520 people, while far-left groups carried out 42 attacks that killed 78 people. The NIJ study was removed from the US Department of Justice website shortly after the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk—an event that Trump explicitly blamed on left-wing groups without evidence, and which came weeks before the signing of NSPM-7.

The budget proposal explains that as a result of NSPM-7, the FBI recently created the NSPM-7 Joint Mission Center (JMC), which is run by personnel from 10 federal agencies.

“The JMC is working to counter domestic terrorism and organized political violence by integrating intelligence operational support, and financial analysis to proactively identify networks and prosecute domestic terrorist and related criminal actors,” reads the proposal.

Scanlon is one of a small number of elected Democrats who have spoken out about NSPM-7 in congressional hearings and media interviews.

“If anyone can be labeled a domestic terrorist for speech opposing this administration, our First Amendment rights are under grave threat,” said Scanlon recently.

Klippenstein noted that the budget document describes social media platforms and encrypted communications apps as being used by “domestic terrorists” to “recruit new adherents, plan and rally support for in-person actions, and disseminate materials encouraging radicalization and mobilization to violence.”

FBI Director Kash Patel told Congress that anyone who used the Discord channels used by Tyler Robinson, who was accused of killing Kirk, would be investigated by the agency.

Klippenstein noted that the FBI’s domestic terrorism watchlist, which as of last September listed about 5,000 US citizens, reportedly “is growing.”

“If your political views are practically anything other than MAGA, you’re on notice, courtesy of the FBI,” Klippenstein wrote.