{*}
Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025 January 2026 February 2026 March 2026 April 2026
1 2 3 4 5 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
News Every Day |

A new scorecard shows which software companies will win or lose in AI

  • AlixPartners analyzes software companies' AI risk with a new AI Disruption Score.
  • The software industry faces a $40 billion debt wall in 2028 that must be refinanced as AI bites.
  • SaaS revenues could fall amid AI competition, AlixPartners warns.

A new analysis from consulting firm AlixPartners suggests the AI-driven "SaaSpocalypse" gripping enterprise software is less a cyclical slowdown and more a structural reset — one that could reshape private-equity portfolios in painful ways.

The firm examined 500 software companies across 12 private-equity portfolios and developed an "AI Disruption Score" to assess which businesses are most exposed to AI and which are relatively insulated. Rather than naming specific companies, AlixPartners ranked subsectors and business models based on two main factors: data and vertical specialization.

Those two "moats," the firm argued, are emerging as the clearest predictors of resilience as AI threatens to commoditize the traditional software stack. AlixPartners is well-placed to assess such risks because it spotted the potential threat of AI to the software industry a year ago, well before most investors and analysts.

AI Disruption Score

The AlixPartners AI Disruption Score places software companies on a spectrum from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater exposure to AI disruption. Businesses with strong data and vertical industry moats fall into the lowest-risk category, while those lacking both are clustered in the highest-risk tier, where business models face "structural pressure" and potential consolidation.

"Protection from AI disruption is far higher when companies own proprietary data, systems of context, ecosystem leverage, embedded workflows, and operate in regulated or critical domains," the firm wrote in an exclusive presentation prepared for Business Insider.

The results are stark. Only about 14% of companies analyzed had strong moats across both dimensions, while roughly a quarter had weak defenses on both fronts, leaving them highly vulnerable as AI-native competitors scale rapidly.

Winners and losers

The distinction often comes down to the nature of the software itself.

Highly exposed categories include marketing automation, horizontal productivity tools, CRM add-ons, and analytics platforms — areas where AI can easily replicate features like summarization, reporting, and customer engagement workflows. These are typically "point solutions" with low switching costs and limited proprietary data, making them easier for AI agents to displace.

By contrast, software embedded in regulated or high-stakes environments, such as payments, financial operations, healthcare systems, and cybersecurity, tends to score much lower on disruption risk. These companies benefit from compliance requirements, mission-critical workflows, and years of accumulated proprietary data, all of which create barriers to entry.

"If you're a large financial institution, fraud detection software is mission-critical, and it's not something you have any tolerance for error on," said Jordan Berger, SVP of TMT Market Intelligence at AlixPartners. "These companies are much less likely in these contexts to let agentic AI native challengers run rampant throughout their enterprise ecosystem. So that type of barrier to entry we see as very durable."

There's a middle ground, too. Companies in this category include systems-of-record providers across subsectors such as enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, and IT service management. (A system of record is the main place where a company keeps the official, trusted version of its important data).

Other subsectors in this group include industry-specific SaaS platforms with limited regulation, such as construction software, as well as offerings focused on finance, sales operations, and procurement.

The firm's framework highlights that not all "systems of record" are equally safe. As the findings show, even enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, long considered defensible, are only rated as having medium-strength moats. AI agents may reduce the number of human users, and therefore software licenses, while stripping away higher-margin add-ons and interfaces, according to AlixPartners' Milicevic.

A looming debt wall

There's a mountain of debt-fueled software investment that could be impacted if generative AI ends up deeply disrupting SaaS business models. These companies had steady subscription-based revenue, which attracted many private-equity buyouts in recent years. Now, there's a $40 billion debt wall in 2028 that will need to be refinanced, just as AI impacts take hold.

After discussing this looming situation with lenders, AlixPartners expects most lenders will charge PE-backed software companies slightly higher interest rates when it's time to refinance, maybe 50 basis points more, according to Nenad Milicevic, a partner and managing director at AlixPartners.

If lenders charge indebted software companies true rates that reflect AI disruption risks, that might cause more problems because the higher interest costs could overwhelm some of these businesses, he added.

"If they bring them up to market level, they would probably ask for 400 basis points more, and then it's over," Milicevic said in an interview with Business Insider. "And that has a contagion effect on the whole market, so they will be very careful."

Falling revenue

The broader backdrop amplifies the risk. SaaS companies are simultaneously grappling with a shift away from seat-based pricing toward usage- and outcome-based models, as well as a surge in AI-native competition.

AlixPartners estimates SaaS revenues could decline by up to 15% over the next year and by 25% to 35% over three years in some segments.

The firm ultimately groups companies into four categories: "fortress" businesses with strong moats; "survivors" that must quickly build or acquire AI capabilities; firms likely to be sold to AI-native buyers; and those facing potential wind-down.

The findings drive home a tough message: The era of growth-at-any-price SaaS is ending, and AI is accelerating a divide between a small group of defensible platforms and a much larger pool of exposed assets.

Sign up for BI's Tech Memo newsletter here. Reach out to me via email at abarr@businessinsider.com.

Read the original article on Business Insider
Ria.city






Read also

NBC’s Savannah Guthrie tells fans, ‘We feel your prayers,’ during emotional moment as mother remains missing

Handle all your PDF needs with this browser-based tool, now $79 for life

What to Know About the 25th Amendment as Lawmakers Call for Trump’s Removal

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here




Sports today


Новости тенниса


Спорт в России и мире


All sports news today





Sports in Russia today


Новости России


Russian.city



Губернаторы России









Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city





Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости