Gavin Newsom’s Extremely Odd Wife
Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Gavin Newsom’s wife, is a feminist of the absolutely rabid variety. She sees everything through the lens that women are greatly oppressed. Her solution to this is twofold. One, abortion must be greatly exalted as the key to women’s freedom and prosperity. Two, all gender roles and stereotypes must be abolished. In essence, she wants women to kill their children to achieve ascendence in society, and she wants to flatten women into neutered nothingness.
A series of clips that have gone viral in recent weeks has shown the extent of Siebel Newsom’s rabid feminism. Simply put, they make her look like a crazy person. She spouts insanity after insanity, making the mistake of thinking that normal women ever think anything like this.
In a 2022 interview, Siebel Newsom claimed that there is “so much to learn from same-sex couples” because they have learned to operate in a relationship devoid of one person from either of the sexes. In this way, same-sex couples present the ideal of a relationship: Men and women no longer operate according to their strengths and weaknesses as men and women, but instead they operate as flat, neutered people who do everything with identical sameness.
There’s so much to learn from same-sex couples, Siebel Newsom said, “who have learned to communicate and who are also like, look, you know, someone’s got to do the care work in a same-sex male couple, someone’s got to do that, so I’m just going to do it, and this is like, and not be afraid or ashamed because it’s part of being human.”
In this statement, Siebel Newsom casts aside motherhood and fatherhood and condenses them simply into “care work” that can be done identically by all. It is no concern if a child is denied his or her mother. All that matters is that we act as though men and women are exactly the same and can interchange with one another for “care work.”
But she goes further than this. According to Siebel Newsom, there is really no such thing as men or women.
“We’re all on a spectrum, right, it’s just how society kind of pushes us and pressures us into these limiting gender roles,” she said.
How on earth could anyone who has met both men and women come to such a conclusion? Men and women are so obviously distinct that anyone who espouses this is lying for ideological purposes, brainwashed into radical feminism, or maybe just dumb.
Siebel Newsom, however, thinks the biggest problem in society is that people haven’t woken up to the reality, as she has, that gender is a spectrum.
“But again the folks on the far right, they’re missing is just this, they’re living in this silo, this evangelical, conservative silo that ultimately is, it’s just pulling us back as a country to a time and a place where we don’t deserve to be and we’re not going to be because honestly young women and fathers of daughters are awake now and they’re woke and they’re not going to let us go back,” she said.
Jennifer Siebel Newsom is very proud of herself for seeking to combat conservatives’ beliefs that men and women are distinct and have separate roles. Apart from her “gender justice” advocacy, she has done so by taking on the moniker of “first partner.” In taking this title on, she has declared that her gender is irrelevant to who she is as a person and plays no role in how she conducts herself in her position.
Back in 2019, she explained her title of “first partner” to Ms. Magazine. The title, she said, “is a statement of Gavin’s and my shared values. It’s a demonstration of our commitment to gender equity and inclusivity — values that go to the heart of our 21st century partnership and who we are as a state.”
She went on to say that the title “advances a new vision for what leadership could look like if we dismantled limiting gender stereotypes that hold women and other marginalized communities back.”
Again, take note that, for Jennifer Siebel Newsom, gender equality requires gender nonexistence.
“The overwhelming majority of people around the country are ready and fighting for gender equality in their homes, places of work, and government,” she further told Ms. Magazine. “It is absolutely my hope that this title is adopted widely — it has already caught on in California with the spouse of our lieutenant governor.”
In a further 2023 interview that has resurfaced over the past week and become viral, Siebel Newsom said that she hopes the title of “first partner” will signal to people, “whether it’s a man, a woman, you know, gender-nonconforming individual, that they’re critical to that person’s success and that they’re part of the other life.” Essentially, the role is performed no differently whether someone is a man, a woman, or a supposedly “gender-nonconforming individual.”
In that same interview, Siebel Newsom appeared to say that previous first ladies in the White House in recent decades did not have freedom in their roles because of how women are treated.
After lauding their work as first ladies, she said, “I’m not saying that actually Secretary Clinton or Michelle Obama or even Jill have that much freedom, because I know there are a lot of constraints on just women generally in leadership but especially a first lady.”
Apparently, Siebel Newsom is so much of a radical feminist that she thinks Michelle Obama was discriminated against and victimized to the point of having her freedom restricted while she was in the White House, simply because of being a woman.
For Jennifer Siebel Newsom, her feminism culminates in her absolute support for abortion. We saw this last month in her feminist meltdown over the fact that reporters weren’t asking, in her opinion, enough questions about abortion. (READ MORE: Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s Feminist Meltdown)
At a press conference announcing an additional $90 million in funding for Planned Parenthood to kill more babies, she said it was “incredulous” that “the majority of the questions — all of these questions — have really been about other issues.”
Siebel Newsom went on to say that the journalists didn’t “seem to care” about abortion. “You wonder why we have such a horrific war on women in this country and that these guys are getting away with it because you don’t seem to care,” she said, adding, “So I just offer that, with love.”
The consistent pattern with Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s feminism — whether it’s espousing support for abortion, trying to flatten women into neutered versions of themselves, or advocating against sexual abuse — is that she always seems to end up dissing women.
In the case of abortion, half the children she wants to kill are girls. Plus, she thinks women can only succeed if they can kill their children. In the case of dismantling gender roles, she wants to tear down the meaning and value of being a woman, a wife, and a mother. Then there is also the fact that Siebel Newsom is going around claiming that even women in positions of power are victims and have no freedom because they are supposedly oppressed.
There is also her history of tearing down women who accuse powerful men of sexually assaulting them. When it came out, for instance, that Newsom had an affair with his secretary, Siebel Newsom responded by saying, “I am a girls’ girl and I’ll always be one… i just wish as women that some of us had more respect for ourselves and didn’t always throw ourselves at the men.” (RELATED: The Women Who Will Haunt Gavin Newsom’s Presidential Campaign)
She also said of Newsom’s affair, “[Newsom has] been so hurt by this all — personally and professionally — and it was a few nothing incidents when she showed up passed out outside of his door. come on guys, have a heart. I have tried to see Ruby’s side of the story but unfortunately everyone near to her has stories and says she is bad news.”
Siebel Newsom has also been accused by Harvey Weinstein accuser Rose McGowan of trying to buy her silence on Weinstein’s abuse.
This is most definitely not a “girls’ girl.” This is a crazed woman whose “feminism” only serves to hurt women.
READ MORE:
Gavin Newsom Is Getting Desperate Over California’s ‘Image Problem’