{*}
Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025 January 2026 February 2026 March 2026
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

2026 March Madness First Round Betting Trends, NCAA Tournament Odds

It's the most wonderful time of year, as the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament, affectionately known as "March Madness" to most, starts this week. This will be the 87th edition of the Tournament and the 41st since expanding to 64 teams in 1985. Given the numerous upsets over the years, FOX Sports Research took a deep dive into the numbers to find you the best first-round and tournament betting trends. We dissected how teams performed against the spread (ATS) and straight up (SU) to give you the information needed to make some successful wagers throughout the first week. Let's dive in. This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports. Underdogs have slight edge against the spread (ATS) in Round of 64 If it feels like underdogs have done well in the first round in recent years, it's because they have — especially from a gambling perspective. Since 2015, they've gone a whopping 162-152-3 ATS (51.6%). Eighty-five of those underdogs actually won their respective games straight up (SU), which is significant considering the number of mid-majors and small programs that compete. Below, we've outlined how underdogs have performed historically since the tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985: Specific seed vs. seed matchups in Round of 64 Expanding a bit more on the first round, here is a breakdown of some interesting trends with double-digit seeds. You might be surprised at how successful the lower seeds have been in recent years: That being said, it would be unfair not to point out some of the glaring losing streaks that many of the small conferences hold, as these are the schools that usually obtain these double-digit seeds. Bet on these coaches to cover in Round of 64 It could be argued that coaching matters more in college basketball than in any other sport, and that notion is accentuated even more in the Tournament. There are six coaches in this year's tourney who rank in the top 20 all-time in cover rate for Round of 64 games (minimum 10 games coached in round): No. 1 seeds dominate in Round of 64 and in title game While we've focused on the Round of 64, we also wanted to give you a quick overview of what characteristics national champions display. Since seeding began in 1979, 28 1-seeds have won 27 national titles, the most of any seed. The rest of the other seeds have combined for just 18 titles. That means 60% of national champions since 1979 have been top seeds. In fact, seven of the past eight national title winners and 14 of the past 18 champions were No. 1 seeds. In the Round of 64, they're almost perfect, going a whopping 158-2 SU (98.9%) and 83-75-2 ATS (52.5%) since 1985. The only 16-seeds to defeat a top seed are UMBC, which took down Virginia in the 2018 Tournament, and the Fairleigh Dickinson team that took down Purdue in 2023. Other notable trends KenPom trends KenPom has become one of the most respected college basketball analytical tools since its debut. The site takes into account various metrics to measure the offensive and defensive efficiencies of every Division I basketball team. Looking at the pre-tournament KenPom data, there are a few interesting trends. Firstly, 23 of the last 24 national champions ranked in the top 21 for adjusted offensive efficiency (2014 UConn lone exception). Twenty-one of the last 24 national champions ranked in the top 31 of adjusted defensive efficiency (2009 North Carolina, 2015 Duke, 2021 Baylor). So, using the 2026 pre-tournament KenPom rankings, below are the eight teams that fit the bill of ranking in the top 21 in offense and top 31 in defense — with odds provided by DraftKings Sportsbook (as of March 18): Duke: +350 (bet $10 to win $45 total)Michigan: +370 (bet $10 to win $47 total)Arizona: +380 (bet $10 to win $48 total)Florida: +750 (bet $10 to win $85 total)Iowa State: +1800 (bet $10 to win $190 total)Illinois: +2200 (bet $10 to win $230 total)Vanderbilt: +7500 (bet $10 to win $760 total)Louisville: +15000 (bet $10 to win $1,510 total) Again, this isn't a strict measure, as teams can get hot — like several teams mentioned above in parentheses. But it is a good indicator of which teams might be worth a title bet prior to the Tournament starting. Duke is the current favorite to win it all (+350), but it's worth noting that 10 of the last 12 title winners all had odds greater than +450 entering the Tournament (last year's Florida team was +325 prior to the first round). And before that, Kentucky in 2012 was the last team to have shorter odds, closing at +185 before their first game. It's also worth noting that all 24 national champions in the KenPom era (since 2001) were ranked in the top 25 for overall adjusted efficiency. All nine of the teams above rank inside the top 13 of this year's pre-tournament KenPom data. So who are you betting on?
Ria.city






Read also

Metas VR Metaverse takes one more step into the grave

After PSG mauling, Chelsea face another scramble to salvage their season

Polymarket opens Washington bar for watching geopolitics markets and breaking news

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here




Sports today


Новости тенниса


Спорт в России и мире


All sports news today





Sports in Russia today


Новости России


Russian.city



Губернаторы России









Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city





Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости