New DOJ documents expose a 2011 plan by Epstein and former intelligence operatives to seize $70 billion in frozen Libyan assets
While NATO bombs were still falling on Tripoli in the summer of 2011, a different kind of predator was circling the Libyan capital from the safety of a Manhattan townhouse. Newly released 2026 US Department of Justice documents reveal that Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and alleged Israeli intelligence asset, was also a geopolitical vulture looking to feast on the remains of the Libyan state.
Epstein’s private correspondence reveals a cold-blooded calculation to bypass international law and tap into the $32.4 billion in Libyan assets frozen in the US. The tragedy of the Libyan people was presented as a commercial opportunity.
On September 18, 2011, while the streets of Libya were still engulfed in the chaos, a clandestine plan was being hatched in New York to capture the country’s sovereign wealth. In an email titled ‘New York – Optics are important’, Jeffrey Epstein’s associate, Greg Brown, urgently pushed the financier to bankroll a high-level meeting with future Libyan leaders during the UN General Assembly. The targets were not minor players; they included Dr. Mohamed Magariaf, who would soon become Libya’s head of state, and his key advisers, Dr. Noah and Fadel Hshad.
Brown identified this trio as the men who would soon hold the mandate to negotiate with global giants like Goldman Sachs. The prize was a staggering $40 billion in Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) assets invested across Sub-Saharan Africa on top of the amounts frozen in the US banks. By offering to “identify, manage and monetize” these funds, Epstein’s circle sought to position themselves as the ultimate gatekeepers of Libya’s post-war economy – a ‘play’ that Brown promised would generate hundreds of millions for their own pockets.
The operation was in fact a privatized intelligence effort designed to exploit the vacuum of the Libyan state. Additional emails from the same period reveal that Epstein’s network was not working in isolation, claiming that former operatives from Britain’s MI6 and Israel’s Mossad were “willing to assist” in the hunt for Libya’s billions. This shadowy alliance viewed the $32.4 billion in funds frozen in the US – as well as the additional $40 billion’s African portfolio – not as protected sovereign wealth, but as a “significant opportunity” for recovery on a contingency-fee basis. By leveraging the “fearless” reputation Greg Brown attributed to Epstein, the group aimed to convince the nascent Libyan leadership that only their network of spies-turned-fixers had the “juice” to navigate the web of global finance and retrieve the nation’s “stolen” assets.
To justify this unprecedented financial intervention, Epstein’s network relied on a carefully constructed narrative that painted all Libyan overseas wealth as ‘stolen and misappropriated’ by the Gaddafi family – a claim that has never been proven 15 years later. This was a deliberate mischaracterization; in reality, these assets were the legitimate holdings of the Libyan State funds, invested in blue-chip stocks like Pearson and global banking giants. By framing a diversified state portfolio as ‘criminal proceeds’, Epstein’s people and their intelligence associates sought a legal loophole to bypass UN sanctions and extract a ‘contingency fee’ from wealth that belonged to the Libyan people – not a single family.
This strategy of criminalizing state assets was particularly aggressive across the African continent. During the 2011 chaos, persistent rumors (often fed by Western intelligence) portrayed the Libya Africa Investment Portfolio as Gaddafi’s personal slush fund rather than a legitimate development vehicle.
This narrative reached its peak with allegations involving former South African President Jacob Zuma. Claims surfaced that Zuma had received $30 million in cash (and even stashes of gold and diamonds) from the late Libyan leader for “safe keeping.” Although Zuma repeatedly and sarcastically denied these claims, noting that he would hardly be struggling with legal fees if he possessed this fortune, the ‘ghost story’ of the ‘Gaddafi Trillions’ served a vital purpose. It allowed shadow players like Epstein to treat the continent’s sovereign investments as ‘missing treasure’ up for grabs rather than state-owned assets that should have remained under the protection of international law.
The true danger of Epstein’s ‘New York Optics’ play was an attempt to formalize a shadow guardianship over Libya’s sovereign institutions before they could even be rebuilt. By targeting the individuals tasked with negotiating the Goldman Sachs settlement, Epstein was looking to establish a precedent when private, unaccountable fixers would manage the nation’s legal disputes.
This was a direct assault on Libya’s financial sovereignty, after the assault on its political sovereignty by the NATO military invasion. While the United Nations mission (UNSMIL) and international community spoke of ‘transitioning to democracy’, Epstein’s documents reveal a parallel reality: A race to ensure that the LIA remained a black box controlled by Manhattan-based intermediaries. This interference likely contributed to the years of litigation and internal divisions that have kept billions of dollars in state wealth effectively paralyzed – leaving the Libyan people to pay the price for a ‘recovery’ process that was designed by predators for predators.
Perhaps the most damning indictment of this intervention is that it was built on a financial phantom. For 15 years, the international community has been regaled with tales of ‘Gaddafi’s hidden trillions’ – a narrative Epstein’s network eagerly exploited to justify their ‘recovery’ services. Yet, the 2026 reality remains stark: Not a single personal bank account or secret stash belonging to the late Muammar Gaddafi has ever been found. The billions frozen in the West are, and always were, the documented institutional assets of the LIA. LIA was created in 2006 to, among other portfolios, invest oil money for poor families in the country.
Ironically, while the West portrayed the late Gaddafi as a man hoarding the nation’s wealth, the historical record shows a very different intent. As early as February 2009, Gaddafi publicly advocated for a radical plan to dismantle the state’s administrative corruption by distributing oil wealth directly to the Libyan people. He argued that wealth should be placed in the hands of the citizens to manage their own affairs – a proposal that faced stiff resistance from the very bureaucracy that later collapsed in 2011. By framing this advocate of wealth distribution as a common thief, Epstein’s associates created the necessary moral cover to target the state’s sovereign capital. They replaced a plan for national empowerment with a scheme for private plunder.
The predatory interest of figures such as Epstein was merely the tip of a much larger iceberg in a post-2011 landscape defined by systematic, state-sponsored pillage. While the international community remained publicly fixated on ‘frozen’ overseas assets, the domestic reality was a violent hemorrhaging of national wealth. According to reports from the Libyan Audit Bureau and various transparency watchdogs, it is estimated that between $100 billion and $200 billion has vanished into a black hole of corruption, institutional waste, and direct theft since the fall of the state in 2011.
This corruption is not merely an internal failure; it is fueled by the very lack of oversight that the West’s ‘liberation’ of Libya enabled – and that Epstein’s ‘private recovery’ schemes sought to exploit. A primary engine for this grand-scale theft is the Central Bank of Libya and its notorious Letters of Credit system. Experts argue that this mechanism has been weaponized to siphon off billions through fraudulent imports – where hard currency is secured at official rates for shipments of ‘goods’ that often never even arrive. The scale of this drain is staggering: In one single 13-week period in 2021, $2.5 billion in letters of credit were issued, with a massive portion of that wealth simply disappearing into the shadow economy.
It is a matter of historical record that Libya, like many developing nations, faced significant corruption challenges prior to 2011. However, the subsequent vacuum of power and constitutional fragmentation has transformed a problem into a systemic catastrophe. As of February 2026, the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index ranks Libya 177th out of 182 countries. With a score of just 13 out of 100, Libya is now officially recognized among the top 6 most corrupt nations on Earth, mired alongside war-torn states such as Syria and Yemen. This transition from a functioning, if flawed, state to a global outlier for graft is the ultimate proof of the failure of the 2011 intervention. The ‘juice’ that Epstein’s circle sought to extract has left the nation’s institutions hollowed out, leaving the Libyan people to inhabit one of the most financially lawless environments in modern history.