Kurtenbach: Death, taxes, and Draymond Green against the Rockets. But is there enough spite to go around?
It was a definitive Draymond Green on Thursday night in Houston: brilliant, exhausting, and fueled almost entirely by spite.
There was the defensive dominance, the offensive positivity, and, of course, some extracurricular activities. In the third quarter, after taking a tumble, Green reached out and grabbed the ankle of a retreating Jabari Smith Jr. Why? Who knows. Perhaps in a game the Warriors were controlling with far too much ease, despite being shorthanded to the point the Rockets played them with kid gloves, it gave him the conflict he craves.
Green needs the friction. He has always operated best in the muck, turning manufactured slights into high-octane fuel. Against a Rockets team featuring his old pal Kevin Durant, against an organization that anyone who went through the salad days truly, deeply loathes, Green dialed up the intensity and put on a defensive masterclass.
He even trash-talked a critical Durant free-throw out of the cylinder with 30 seconds left in a one-point game in overtime. Before the attempt, he walked from under the hoop to the free-throw line, said something in Durant’s general direction, and stood there as Tari Easton feebly tried to stand between the two Hall of Famers.
“Vintage Draymond,” Steve Kerr told reporters after the game. “The defense, the leadership, the force, the passing.”
It was.
It was also a glaring, unwelcome reminder.
While watching Green turn back the clock is undoubtedly entertaining for a night, it highlights a stark reality for Golden State:
Look at how much effort it takes for these Warriors just to survive a Thursday night against Houston in early March.
Look at how much energy Green had to expend just to drag them across the finish line.
And then remind yourself how rarely we see anything like that from Green these days.
At 36 years old, the nightly grind of the NBA — dragging true 7-footers up and down the court like Roger Murdock — has, unsurprisingly, taken its toll. And being on a team without legitimate title chances — and now without Steph Curry — makes it hard to turn on the games, much less play at peak performance.
Three or four games off, one game on. In between, he fires off some hot takes on his eponymous podcast.
Is this self-preservation for something greater or simply the grim reality of an aging player whose post-prime decline brought a steep, irrevocable decline?
(Are the takes coming from the same energy source as his on-court game?)
The good news for Golden State is that these regular-season games don’t particularly matter. They can’t get out of the play-in tournament if they tried to go up or down.
So Green can go back to sad-sacking and triple-singling starting Saturday against the Thunder, and certainly Monday against the Jazz.
But if the Warriors are going to make any kind of noise in the postseason, they need the Green we saw Thursday every single game, without fail.
It can’t be “vintage” Draymond then — it has to be standard practice.
And a little practice at that kind of consistency might be in order.
Because when the calendar flips to mid-April, there are no nights off. Given their standing, the Warriors might only get one guaranteed postseason game. At best, two.
Thursday night proved beyond a doubt that Green still has the ability to control games in a way that only the truly great players can. His basketball IQ hasn’t diminished. His competitive fire, when he sees a particular shade of red or a familiar face like Durant, still burns white-hot.
But is that ability now strictly limited to special-edition, turn-back-the-clock days? Is it a finite resource that he can only tap into when the spite is flowing, and the narrative demands it? Or is this elite, dominant version of Draymond merely lying dormant, conserving energy until the playoffs arrive, just waiting to be unleashed fully?
The Warriors are betting on the latter. They don’t have any choice, even if all evidence points to the contrary.
Because if Thursday’s masterclass was just a fleeting glimpse of the past — a simple tease — it doesn’t make all the down days worth it; it makes them all the more aggravating to watch.
Always antagonizing: Vintage Draymond.