{*}
Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025 January 2026 February 2026 March 2026
1 2 3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Quick Reaction: Knicks 111, Raptors 95

New York Knicks 111 Final
95 Toronto Raptors
B-
J. Poeltl30 MIN, 9 PTS, 7 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 4-6 FG, 0-0 3FG, 1-1 FT, 1 BLK, 2 TO, -10 +/-

His numbers were understated, but he was okay when he was on the court, at least in some areas. Really strong hands defending in the pick and roll, forcing a few awkward gathers as he got his hands on the ball during drives. And he did it without fouling in the first half, too. He cleaned the glass in the first half but got beaten by Mitchell Robinson repeatedly in the second. And elsewhere defensively he was a letdown. With Barnes away from the rim guarding Brunson, Poeltl wasn’t able to lock down the paint.

B+
S. Barnes36 MIN, 14 PTS, 4 REB, 1 AST, 3 STL, 5-9 FG, 1-3 3FG, 3-3 FT, 1 BLK, 3 TO, -2 +/-

He was strong, if quiet, early on. He defended Jalen Brunson very well in his time on the speedy guard, and the Raptors used him as Brunson’s primary. (I thought he gave up switches a little too easily, but that’s nit-picking, and much more about scheme than Barnes himself.) He forced tons of turnovers, especially during Toronto’s comeback in the third quarter. He attacked the glass and even found his way to an and-1 drive out of pick and roll with Poeltl. But the scoring really was limited in such a physical contest.

B+
I. Quickley33 MIN, 13 PTS, 3 REB, 12 AST, 2 STL, 4-14 FG, 3-10 3FG, 2-2 FT, 0 BLK, 2 TO, -9 +/-

Even when the shots weren’t falling in the first half, I didn’t hate his choices in the game. He ran some smooth pick and rolls with Poeltl, and the assist total moved me. He was solid on defence and broke up some plays to lead to steals. He was generally where he was supposed to be on that end, which wasn’t true of all his teammates. When his triples started falling in the third quarter, the Raptors immediately closed the gap and found themselves in a very close game.

A
B. Ingram37 MIN, 31 PTS, 2 REB, 4 AST, 1 STL, 11-20 FG, 3-5 3FG, 6-7 FT, 1 BLK, 2 TO, -7 +/-

An unbelievable first half. Opened with some triples. Got to the rim. Then he started cooking in the mid-range, drawing plenty of fouls with his work there, too. It wasn’t perfect; committed a completely unforced eight-second violation walking the ball up the floor late in the third. And the scoring tailed off in the second half. Still, he was one of the only reasons Toronto stayed in this game so long.

C+
R. Barrett37 MIN, 20 PTS, 4 REB, 3 AST, 0 STL, 9-13 FG, 1-3 3FG, 1-2 FT, 0 BLK, 2 TO, -16 +/-

A real tale of the two sides of the ball. He looked much, much burstier on the drive. Took over in the fourth for a stretch with some mid-range and rim points, using screens very well. In the second quarter, he had a fantastic spin move through the Knicks’ entire defence. And yet defensively he was getting torched, giving up blowbys and putting Toronto’s help defence in very difficult positions. Gave up easy blowbys when closing out, too. The scoring was nice, but the defence was more impactful (to the negative), in my eyes.

C
S. Mamukelashvili16 MIN, 4 PTS, 4 REB, 1 AST, 0 STL, 1-6 FG, 0-1 3FG, 2-2 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, -2 +/-

One of his worst games, though he did redeem himself slightly with some second-half defence. Was not himself offensively in the first half, and he was getting beat for rebounds and in space defensively. The Knicks are a physical team, and Mamukelashvili usually meets those challenges. He didn’t in the first half. In the second half, he was much better. Fought with more resilience on the glass. Moved his feet defensively on a switch and blocked a pull-up jumper from Jose Alvarado. He wasn’t drawing fouls in the second half on his rim attempts and couldn’t finish through contact.

Inc
T. Jackson-Davis1 MIN, 0 PTS, 0 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 0-0 FG, 0-0 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, 0 +/-

Garbage time.

Inc
G. Dick1 MIN, 0 PTS, 0 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 0-1 FG, 0-0 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, 0 +/-

Garbage time.

C+
J. Shead24 MIN, 4 PTS, 3 REB, 3 AST, 0 STL, 1-4 FG, 0-2 3FG, 2-2 FT, 0 BLK, 2 TO, -9 +/-

Was hounding Brunson when he was in the game, or at least trying to. The Raptors had one of Shead or Barnes on the court at all times to make sure one was guarding Brunson. He picked up a cheap foul early, but he also forced a turnover and generally made Brunson’s life painful and difficult. He also drove for a layup in the half court, which is notable. He had some sloppy turnovers. In the third, he drove, juked, stepped through, and lobbed to Barnes for a dunk. But in the fourth, Brunson scored with relative ease with Shead guarding him. Tough.

D-
J. Walter18 MIN, 0 PTS, 1 REB, 0 AST, 2 STL, 0-3 FG, 0-3 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, -14 +/-

Toronto got absolutely shelled in his time in the first half, losing his seven minutes by 20 points. It’s not entirely Walter’s fault, but the numbers did show his inability to compete, at the very least. He defended poorly by his standards, and he was basically a zilch on offence. The Knicks are beatable when they’re playing defence, but everyone needs to be a threat, and Walter wasn’t. In the third quarter, he forced a turnover on an inbounds with a heads-up defensive play.

Inc
J. Battle5 MIN, 0 PTS, 0 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 0-0 FG, 0-0 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, -11 +/-

Just wasn’t doing much in his few minutes in the first half, and didn’t get run in the second. Rajakovic used a tight, playoff-style rotation in this one, and Battle saw his role slashed as a result. .

Inc
A. Martin1 MIN, 0 PTS, 0 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 0-1 FG, 0-1 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, 0 +/-

Garbage time.

Inc
A. Lawson1 MIN, 0 PTS, 0 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 0-0 FG, 0-0 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, 0 +/-

Garbage time.

Inc
J. Mogbo1 MIN, 0 PTS, 0 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 0-0 FG, 0-0 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, 0 +/-

Garbage time.

B-
Darko Rajakovic

With Barnes and Poeltl both guarding shooters, who was supposed to protect the rim? Barnes did a great job defending Brunson, yet the Knicks scored with ease when they weren’t turning over the ball. I thought Rajakovic’s matchup choices played into that. And the clutch offence was terrible, but that’s not really on the coach very much. Toronto did work its way back into the game, which is solid.

Things We Saw

  1. A sloppy stretch in the second quarter really doomed the Raptors. Needless turnovers, not getting back in transition, getting back cut for no reason. Ugly stuff. Tough to climb out of a hole like that against a team like the Knicks.
  2. The bench-bench matchup was when Toronto lost the game. Toronto continued losing Landry Shamet from deep. Its bench players were unable to provide nearly as much punch. Getting a versatile scorer off the bench would be a meaningful add for the Raptors.
  3. As a passer, Shead does something smart: find the hot hand, even if it’s not the obvious pass. He was always looking for Ingram when he was driving, in space, or in transition. Smart point guardery.
  4. The Raptors absolutely shredded the Knicks with their top two on the court tonight. When Ingram and Barnes were both playing, it was clear who was the better team. Sure, the Raptors lacked depth, and made severe mental errors. But there was a lot of positivity to take away from the game regardless. And then … closing time. Wild how the Raptors can dominate starter-starter matchups all night and then get annihilated when it counts.

Your next read: Samson Folk detailed the game.

The front half of the second quarter was a disaster. Summed up best, maybe, by a sequence where the Raptors got caught on a 5-second violation after a timeout, and immediately gave up a layup off an outlet pass after that. Disorganized and out of it. The Knicks upped their physicality on defense and started stringing together stronger backline help, and it allowed them to get stops and run outs. Not only was their shot making better than the Raptors in the halfcourt, but they were more active in the full court as well. A terrible mix, and one that fuelled the Knicks run to a double-digit lead. 

The post Quick Reaction: Knicks 111, Raptors 95 first appeared on Raptors Republic.

Ria.city






Read also

Burning questions

Nepali women still sidelined in post-uprising polls

Trump likely to get free hand on Iran from badly divided Congress

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here




Sports today


Новости тенниса


Спорт в России и мире


All sports news today





Sports in Russia today


Новости России


Russian.city



Губернаторы России









Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city





Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости