America wants a nuclear renaissance. It may yet need a South Korean one.

America’s nuclear revival stalls at three brutal chokepoints: first-of-a-kind (FOAK) financing perils, a shriveled manufacturing base, and a brittle fuel supply. 

Here, improbably, steps South Korea, not as a tech vendor or moral ally, but as an industrial financier with the rare alchemy of cash, expertise, and execution. Home to 26 reactors supplying a third of its electricity, South Korea’s nuclear giants, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP), Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO), and Doosan Enerbility have built on time and on budget at the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) Barakah Nuclear Power Plant. South Korea is no mere cheque-writer, but it offers catalytic capital, equity laced with engineering muscle. In a world where private investors flee FOAK shadows, South Korean involvement could bridge the gap between ambition and kilowatts, turning policy into plants.

Catalytic Equity: De-Risking FOAK SMR Financing

The stingiest bottleneck is finance. FOAK reactors, especially small modular reactors (SMRs) such as NuScale’s or X-energy’s Xe-100, demand $5 to 10 billion upfront, with delays that can balloon costs 50 percent or more, lessons etched in Georgia’s Vogtle overruns. Investors, scarred by the 2010s’ bankruptcies, demand yields that nuclear power’s 60-year lifespan cannot easily afford. Tax credits and Loan Programs (LPOs) help, but they are no panacea without private skin in the game.

Enter South Korean joint ventures (JVs) as the missing equity spark. Rather than passive limited partners, South Korean firms could take developer stakes tethered to engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contracts or supply chain rights. This alignment slashes the perceived risk that capital comes with the operational chops to hit milestones. Structures abound: preferred equity to cushion early overruns, mezzanine debt for mid-build bridging, or back-to-back power-purchase agreements (PPAs) with data center titans such as Amazon, which inked an Xe-100 deal in 2025. Co-financing with the LPO federal debt layered atop South Korean equity could halve the weighted-average costs of capital to a reasonable range, making FOAK bankable.

Evidence mounts. A 2025 KHNP-Doosan memorandum of understanding (MOU) eyes 5 gigawatts (GW) of US SMRs by 2039, blending equity with engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC). Such deals signal credibility when South Korean stakes correlate with delivery, Wall Street follows. As one LPO official notes, “Korean capital isn’t just money, it’s a bet on execution.” In investors’ eyes, it transforms nuclear energy from a speculative gamble to an anchored yield.

Forging Ahead: Rebuilding America’s Atomic Arsenal

Finance is fleeting, and factories endure. America’s real Achilles’ heel is manufacturing throughput, the unglamorous grind of reactor pressure vessels, steam generators, and heavy forgings that SMR fleets demand. Domestic capacity, dominated by BWXT and a handful of mills, idles after decades of dormancy; imports from Japan or Europe clash with IRA “Made in America” mandates. Quadrupling new nuclear by 2050, per DOE blueprints, requires N-stamp-certified plants churning out modules like Detroit stamps cars.

South Korean investment could reboot this forge. Through acquisitions, JVs, or greenfield builds, firms such as Doosan, already supplying turbines via 2025 MOUs with Westinghouse and Fermi America, could transplant lean production and quality regimes stateside. Doosan’s track record? Zero major delays on four exported reactors. A $1 billion JV for Ohio forgings, say, would not only meet Buy American rules but infuse South Korean supply-chain wizardry, just-in-time sourcing, digital twins for defect-free welds. For SMRs, where factory fab cuts site costs by 30 percent, this means serial scalability, first a dozen units, then hundreds.

From an industrial-policy lens, it’s a double win. Washington gains energy sovereignty, anchoring 10,000 jobs in swing states; Seoul secures offtake and tech repatriation. The constraint, quips a Doosan executive, “is not reactor theory, but throughput reality.” South Korean capital turns rust-belt relics into renaissance engines.

Geopolitically, it’s friendshoring gold: South Korean capital dilutes Moscow’s leverage, aligning with Biden-era (and Trumpian) supply-chain fortification. Investors salivate at the annuity: stable fuel margins atop volatile spot prices (above $170 per Separative Work Unit [SWU]).

Operations and Fleets: The Long Haul to Scale

Builds grab headlines; operations mint fortunes. Nuclear’s 92 percent capacity factor yields 40-year cash cows, but US utilities grapple with outages and skills gaps. South Korean operations and maintenance (O&M) prowess—KHNP’s flawless fleet uptime—fits via JVs, blending local labor with Seoul’s outage playbook. This extends partnerships lifecycle-wide, from EPC to decommissioning.

For SMRs, the prize is fleets, not prototypes. Early South Korean anchor investments in one or two FOAK units could condition supply-chain outlays on repeat orders, igniting learning curves that halve costs per gigawatt. A virtuous loop emerges: equity funds pilots, manufacturing scales series, fuel secures baseload. Venture capitalists, eyeing Amazon’s nuclear bets, see market-making, not moonshots.

An Allied Compact: Policy as the Final Fuse

America’s nuclear dawn demands more than dollars. It craves a compact. Washington should crown Korean inflows as “alliance strategic plays”: streamlined permitting (under 24 months), LPO fast-tracks, and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) credits for JV modules. No more FOAK fog.

For South Korea, think portfolio: weave finance, factories, fuel, and operations into a 60-year bet on America’s 94-reactor behemoth-plus-SMR surge. Piecemeal won’t cut it, but integration will.

US nuclear isn’t a solo sprint. South Korea’s capital, which is pragmatic, patient, and proficient, could be the alloy that tempers ambition into reality. The reactors will spin, the grids will glow, and the alliance will endure, one forged vessel at a time.

In the end, America’s nuclear revival will not be decided in laboratories or campaign speeches, but in the unglamorous world of balance sheets, factories, and fuel contracts. Washington may have the ambition and the demand shock driven by AI, electrification, and geopolitical anxiety, but it lacks the industrial muscle to scale quickly without partners. South Korea, by contrast, brings what the American nuclear ecosystem has quietly lost. Disciplined project execution, export-tested supply chains, and patient capital that can survive long construction timelines. If Korea chooses to deploy that capital not only into reactors but into the fuel and manufacturing spine that sustains them, it will do more than secure its own energy sovereignty. It will help rebuild a Western nuclear order, one less dependent on Russia, less vulnerable to China, and far more capable of turning nuclear promises into steel, uranium, and megawatts.

About the Author: Stella Kim

Stella (SuHee) Kim is an investment and nuclear strategy expert with over a decade of experience bridging global finance and deep-tech, with a particular focus on small modular reactors (SMRs). She is the CEO of Pandia Bridge, a Singapore-based advisory firm that connects global investors and leading Korean conglomerates with top SMR developers, including NuScale Power, to facilitate cross-border investments and strategic partnerships. Her work centers on the intersection of energy security, technology innovation, and strategic finance on a global scale. She holds a BA from Ajou University in South Korea and participated in a study abroad program at the Luleå University of Technology in Sweden.

The post Is South Korean Capital the Missing Ingredient in America’s Nuclear Comeback? appeared first on The National Interest.