The Epstein Vortex and Legal Black Holes

Because black holes emit no light, scientists cannot see them with telescopes. Instead, they confirm their existence by observing signs, such as the extreme distortions they cause in the visible matter around them or by watching stars orbit a void. And if you refuse to observe these signs, adopting willful blindness, you cannot detect black holes.

It’s a valid question to ask whether law enforcement agencies monitored any U.S. laws, rules, or regulations that apply to Little St. James, a 71-acre island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Epstein bought it in 1998 and turned it into an upscale resort where political figures and wealthy men came to have sex with imported underage girls. Were there any customs and immigration officers or police on the island? As far as we know, there was no routine law enforcement while the sex trafficking was operating. Anyone—girls or predators—who visited Epstein’s island fell into a vortex. But sex was just one layer of the Island.

The Epstein phenomenon was a complex web, with layers within layers, as secrecy, sex, power, and money converged to sustain a mutually supportive scheme that lasted for decades. It was far more than a sex destination where influential men had sex with the snared women. The unanswered question is not whether sexual exploitation occurred, but what secondary purposes the venture enabled.

What exactly was the quid pro quo for access to the Island, and how did extortionists benefit from the photographs and videotapes of influential men? And who exactly are the extortionists? Perhaps we will never know about all the deals made on the Island. That opacity is the attribute of black holes.

The term “legal black hole” was coined in 2003 by Lord Johan Steyn of the United Kingdom House of Lords in reference to Guantanamo Bay, a legally vacuous place, where neither U.S. laws nor international law applied. Muslim militants, some innocent bystanders, abducted from various countries, were brought there, kept in captivity, and tortured for decades. Some committed suicide, some were later released, though some are still there in detention.

Legal black holes are not just metaphors or analogies referencing celestial black holes in physics. They are as real as their celestial counterparts and share some characteristics, which are examined later in this article. However, there are significant differences between the two. A celestial black hole is a natural phenomenon, while a legal one is artificially created. Lawyers play a vital role in designing such structures, just as they draft confidential arbitration agreements or locate tax loopholes to safeguard assets.

Defining Legal Black Holes

Any place, and it does not have to be an island—although islands are ideal geographical units—where laws are effectively absent, unenforced, or operate in complete darkness is a legal black hole, an opaque structure. In the 21st century, very few places are outside the control of nation-states. Historically, such structures have been synonymous with terra nullius, a place without law. However, they also exist and thrive within modern state jurisdictions.

Whenever a place or phenomenon disregards laws without consequence, it becomes a lawless entity. Its lawless core is not the absence of law but the failure of laws to function effectively.

Hence, the defining feature of an opaque structure is that existing laws are neutralized through influence and corruption, and any rules that do exist—if they do at all—remain hidden, private, and unaccountable. Regular laws stop functioning, even though they are still written on paper. In U.S. territories such as the Virgin Islands, federal, criminal, immigration, and maritime laws apply to Little St. James, even though it was a private island.

Epstein’s operation continued because laws were suspended through non-enforcement, prosecutorial discretion, secrecy agreements, and protections for the elite. The Island was well within the scope of law enforcement and easily targetable given its size and location. Yet it became a lawless zone because law enforcement turned a blind eye.

There is a wide range of legally opaque entities, varying in scale and durability. Some arise from ineffective law; others from compromised or complicit enforcement; some persist because exposure itself is institutionally forbidden; others exist precisely because the law authorizes them.

Intelligence Agencies

Intelligence agencies, such as the CIA and the Mossad, often operate in legally murky areas. Although they are theoretically limited by domestic laws and oversight, their activities are hidden behind secrecy, classified approvals, and national-security exemptions. This makes external verification—and often meaningful accountability—impossible.

While intelligence agencies may follow the law at home, they often ignore the laws of the countries where they operate, engaging in recruitment, bribery, coercion, targeted killing, and covert sabotage under claims of vital necessity for their homeland. When operating in a foreign country, a spy agency can be as lawless as needed to accomplish its objectives. The only limit is the risk of getting caught. For spy agencies, the law is not absent or unknown; it is suspended, overridden, or rendered nonjusticiable. In this way, intelligence activities operate in an uncontrolled zone and are institutionally protected within it.

Digital and Procedural Black Holes

A legal black hole may have a purely digital existence. The Canary Mission, a website, is a conspicuous example. In its own words, “Canary Mission documents people and groups that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews.” American professors, students, professionals, and organizations are profiled on the website. You are most likely to be profiled on the website if you subscribe to the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

What makes the Canary Mission a lawless entity is that no one knows who owns the website, who finances it, who edits it, or whether it is hosted in a foreign country.  The Canary mission is not a dark website; it is open and takes pride in its existence. Dark websites that steal information are unlawful entities. However, U.S. enforcement agencies are aware of the Canary Mission’s existence and operation, as the information on the website has been used in immigration contexts (visa denials or deportations).

Therefore, in situations like this, a lawless digital entity, at least for the people profiled on the website who might seek legal remedies, operates anonymously in full view of law enforcement.

Sometimes, the law itself allows opaque structures. The rise of arbitration as a method of dispute resolution invites the creation of opaque structures. Arbitration can keep secrets from the public because not only the final award but also the entire arbitration process can be kept confidential. Laws protect these kinds of arbitration outcomes. If a large company is accused of serial sexual or racial harassment, the company often uses arbitration clauses embedded in employment contracts to hide disturbing details that could damage the company’s reputation and its products.

Arbitration does not become an opaque structure by resolving disputes privately; it does when confidentiality hides patterns of harm that require public accountability.

Violations and Secrecy

Legal black holes must be distinguished from enforceable violations of the law and from secrecy. Enforceable violations assume the existence of functional and effective laws, though such laws can be arbitrary, flawed, biased, or unjust. On the U.S. mainland, laws exist, and violations can be prosecuted. Enforcement resources may be insufficient to prosecute every violation. In some cases, as in Minnesota, law enforcement against immigrants is far more vigorous than usual.

But in a black hole mimicking a legal vacuum, no violations are enforced. Non-enforcement is not due to a lack of resources but to a lack of will. A well-designed opaque structure is insulated from law enforcement by design, not by accident. It is not merely lawless; it is untouchable. That is why wealth and influence are necessary for building lawless zones.

Likewise, secrecy is a legal concept. Documents sensitive to national security are kept secret, and this secrecy is legal. Even secrecy is governed by law. A person may petition under the Freedom of Information Act to find out what information the government has collected about them. However, even information released may be redacted under various legal pretexts.

The law even permits secret courts. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), established by the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), is known as a “secret court” as it reviews government surveillance requests related to national security. The eleven federal district judges, selected by the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, hear cases in secrecy, on a part-time basis, often without public records, to assess intelligence issues. This secrecy is not a violation of law but a result of it. The FISC secrecy functions within the law to restrict public knowledge while maintaining formal legality.

In contrast, an opaque venture cannot operate without secrecy, but these secrets are neither regulated nor permitted by law. Still, such secrets flourish because the functional law is disabled. Jeffrey Epstein himself was not a secret, nor were his islands. The invited predators led public lives, and the girls brought to the Island had families, friends, and names. However, what happened there involved secrets on a deeper level: they were beyond the reach of law enforcement. That enforced inaccessibility, not just secrecy, made the Island a legally untouchable structure.

Celestial Parallels

The following analysis uses the language and imagery of celestial black holes to illuminate their legal counterparts. We are still exploring black holes, as they are more complex than the stars we observe. Perhaps celestial black holes evaporate into nothingness. Perhaps larger vortices consume smaller ones. Maybe what falls into a vortex cannot be retrieved. Maybe celestial black holes are ambitious artifices concocted by creative minds. Legal counterparts are no different.

Physicists have identified three important features of a celestial black hole: the event horizon is the boundary separating the black hole from its surroundings. Spaghettification refers to the distortion of any object that crosses the event horizon and enters a black hole. Singularity lies at the core of the black hole, where all objects that enter merge into a single dense mass. Without overstating the analogy, these three phenomena recur with disturbing consistency in Epstein-type enterprises.

Event Horizon. In astrophysics, a black hole has an event horizon, a spherical boundary that separates it from stars and planets around it. A nation-state has sovereign borders that define its geographical boundaries, including entry and exit points. Similarly, a legal black hole has its own boundaries. Epstein’s Island had limited access by boat or helicopter. The predators, girls, and spy agents would first arrive at St. Thomas, the island with an international airport. Then, a special boat or helicopter would take them to Epstein’s Island.

In certain legal frameworks, the event horizon is crossed when the law is rendered ineffective through wealth and influence. The event horizon in such frameworks is not always physical or territorial. It occurs when ordinary law no longer applies in practice, even if it remains on paper.

In one undated incident, a 15-year-old girl tried to swim off to St Thomas, a courageous act, after she was forced to have sex with a few people on the Island. However, the Island security guards chased her, caught her, and brought her back. Her passport was confiscated. The escape violated the code of silence, even though outside it, any such escape would have been perfectly legal, and law enforcement would have helped. Thus, an act that occurs inside an opaque structure is not the same as the same act in a transparent place governed by ordinary laws.

The event horizon separates the lawless domain from the legally functioning world. The laws within this opaque domain, if any exist, are radically different from those in a normal community or nation. As mentioned before, legally obscure enterprises have their own laws, but how those laws operate is unknown to the public.

In celestial black holes, the event horizon represents the point of no return. Once an object—or even information—crosses that boundary, escape becomes impossible. Returning from the vortex would require exceeding the speed of light, a physical limit that currently cannot be broken.

A similar dynamic existed on Epstein Island. Once a girl and a world leader step onto Epstein Island, there is no way for them to return to the world as it was before. Whatever happens inside the black hole cannot be undone, erased, or fully fixed by law. The business tycoon, the celebrity, and the world leader may physically leave, but their moral, psychological, and legal state has been permanently changed. Whoever enters the vortex is denatured and does not return the same.

Spaghettification. A prominent feature of a celestial black hole is the phenomenon known as spaghettification. Stephen Hawking introduced the idea by imagining an astronaut entering a celestial black hole. If he lands feet first in the vortex, the gravitational forces will pull on his feet, causing the astronaut’s body to stretch out and become thin, like a noodle.  

When anything enters a celestial vortex, it does not fall inward intact as it is. Gravitational forces rip it apart, stretching it into long, thin strands—spaghettification. The object’s structure collapses. What once had shape, boundaries, and coherence is pulled beyond recognition, losing the features that defined it. That deconstruction is the power of a celestial black hole.

A legal vortex operates in much the same way. Anyone who enters it is stripped of a stable identity. Titles, roles, and public narratives lose their protective force, be it Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, or Noam Chomsky, regardless of what they did or did not do. A provable association with the vortex, regardless of any crimes committed, is sufficient to shatter a person’s integrity and moral stature.

If a prince steps onto Epstein’s Island, he is no longer a prince in any meaningful sense. He is disassembled. Pieces of him are retained by the operator of the enterprise; others are appropriated by intermediaries and fixers; some remain in the memory and trauma of the girl the prince assaulted; still other strands of his being are trapped in photographs and videos for leverage and control.

What emerges from the vortex is no longer a whole person with integrity and dignity but an amorphous remainder, a damaged, manipulable being serving as a target for something more malevolent, perhaps a spy asset. Whether predator or prey, each is a broken participant, stretched across power, secrecy, and coercion, held together only by the gravity of the operation itself. The power shifts to the enterprise’s operators.

Singularity. Deep inside a celestial black hole lies what physicists call the singularity, a hypothesized region where gravity becomes infinite, and the known laws of physics break down. Everything, no matter what it is, is crushed into nothingness or something completely different from what it has been outside the vortex. Everything becomes one and turns into a dense mass. Whereas spaghettification turns an object into threads, singularity merges everything into a single entity.

The girls brought from Europe and elsewhere have unique identities based on race, color, language, culture, family, nationality, and many other small factors that define each person. However, the Epstein vortex erodes their individuality and human dignity, forcing them to merge into one. Similarly, all predators assume a singular identity in the belly of the enterprise. Even the girls and predators blend into a single mass for the operator of the vortex.

The dense mass—comprising compromised influential and wealthy people and their victim girls—is condensed into a powerful singularity at the center of the labyrinth, driving the black hole’s success. This unity holds the deeper secrets of the Epstein phenomenon masquerading as sexual trafficking on the surface. Law enforcement must investigate who the real beneficiaries are. But will they be permitted to dig deep enough?

Controlled Demolition

Compared to their celestial counterparts, legal vortices are inherently fragile. They do not last for billions of years; they survive for only years or decades at most. Their stability relies on their continued usefulness to elite participants and on mutual silence among those caught in their gravity.

Eventually, legal black holes rupture. When they do, they release fragments of what they once contained—operators, beneficiaries, victims, emails, documents, testimony, partial disclosures—never the whole truth. This selective disclosure is what appears to be happening with the release of the so-called Epstein files, a collection of materials gathered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation. The island was raided by the FBI in 2019, which occurred following Epstein’s arrest. We will never know everything that occurred inside the Epstein black hole, because complete collapse is neither politically nor institutionally tolerable.

In 2007, Epstein entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with federal prosecutors. Under this arrangement, he pleaded guilty to two minor state offenses and received a short sentence that allowed him to spend most of each day (16 hours) outside a minimum-security facility in Florida. The agreement insulated him—and crucially, unnamed others—from federal prosecution.

The NPA itself became part of the opaque scheme. Despite later challenges arguing that it violated victims’ rights, the agreement’s secrecy survived. One of its most consequential features was the federal government’s promise not to prosecute Epstein’s co-conspirators. Four were named; however, the NPA also protected “any potential co-conspirators.” Who were they? The public can speculate, but their identities remain officially undisclosed. The secrecy surrounding them was not incidental; it was structural. Why did the federal prosecutor decide to protect any potential co-conspirators? Who influenced the NPA?

Opaque structures implode not when wrongdoing is uncovered, but when the political forces shielding them fracture. Their undoing is not the triumph of enforcement agencies. When the protectors of a dark enterprise turn into rivals, silence loses its power. Such structures are flung open by tribal warfare, not by a love of morality or respect for the law.

In 2019, Epstein died in federal custody while awaiting trial during Donald Trump’s first administration, but no full disclosure took place. During his second-term campaign, Trump publicly promised to release the files. He initially held back and then reversed course under political pressure. In November 2025, Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Subsequent releases—while substantial in volume—have remained partial, heavily redacted in places, and criticized for selective disclosure. These disclosures resembled controlled demolition rather than full transparency.

Redaction, while legally permitted, remains highly discretionary. What is redacted might reveal clues or be the very secrets that initially created the Epstein black hole.

Only the naïve believe that the Epstein phenomenon is just about sex with underage girls. A key unresolved question remains: why was Epstein systematically recording business leaders, celebrities, and political figures regardless of their political party, ideology, or even nationality? Over the years, the operation was more than sex trafficking. It created leverage, dependency, contortion, and silence. This innermost layer of the black hole, the purpose for which it was built, its raison d’etre, probably will stay hidden for a long time.

Conclusion

Legal black holes are not anomalies or analogies; they are constructed environments in which law is bent, suspended, or neutralized to serve the interests of wealth, power, and intelligence agencies. Unlike their celestial counterparts, they are unstable and ultimately collapse, not because justice wins or law enforcement catches up with them, but because their usefulness diminishes or those involved break alliances. The code of silence is broken not lightly but under some irresistible pressure. What comes out of demolition is never the full truth, only fragments released through controlled disclosure.

The Epstein files demonstrate how purpose, evidence, and law can be absorbed, distorted, and only partially revealed without complete resolution. This case is not only about men having sex with minors at a resort, which appears to function as an initiation ritual, an act of solidarity, a tacit vow of fiduciary duty within an elite network. “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” What remains hidden outside the files is not accidental; it is the very purpose for which such structures are built.

The post The Epstein Vortex and Legal Black Holes appeared first on CounterPunch.org.