Why some jobs trigger old fears

Work has a way of waking up parts of us we thought we’d outgrown.

You can move forward professionally, take on more visible roles, and be widely regarded as capable—and still find yourself unsettled by moments that seem, on the surface, fairly ordinary. A comment lingers longer than expected. A meeting leaves you tense for days. A role you worked hard to earn suddenly feels exposing rather than energizing.

When that happens, it’s tempting to assume something is wrong now: that you’re underprepared, out of your depth, or simply not built for this level of responsibility. But often, what’s being stirred up has less to do with the present moment than with experiences that shaped you much earlier in your career.

The past isn’t gone. It’s patterned.

Consider Anna, a senior public health leader who had built a reputation for sound judgment and steady leadership. When she accepted a high-profile role in government, it looked like a natural next step.

Internally, it felt like a step backward.

Almost immediately, she began doubting herself in ways that were unfamiliar. She grew anxious before meetings and unusually sensitive to tone and hierarchy. After speaking, she would replay her comments, convinced she’d revealed some fundamental gap.

What made this disorienting was that nothing objectively negative was happening. Her colleagues were engaged. Her supervisor was supportive. Her performance was strong.

And yet her body reacted as if the stakes were much higher.

Over time, a pattern became clear. Anna had trained in an elite graduate program where intimidation was framed as rigor. Public critique was common. Questions were treated as exposures. Authority felt unpredictable.

At the time, she adapted in ways that made sense. She became meticulously prepared. She learned to anticipate criticism before it arrived. She made herself intellectually airtight.

That strategy worked. She succeeded. She moved on.

Except that some part of her never quite did.

Her new role didn’t create anxiety—it activated an old internal map, one shaped in an environment where visibility carried real risk. Intellectually, she knew she belonged. Psychologically, she was responding to an earlier chapter.

This is how the past often shows up at work: not as a memory, but as a reflex.

Why some roles feel heavier than others

Psychologists have long observed that unresolved experiences don’t fade with time. They flatten. They remain emotionally vivid and are reactivated when something feels familiar enough—especially situations involving evaluation, authority, or public exposure.

In those moments, the brain doesn’t reliably distinguish between then and now. The body responds as if the original stakes have returned.

This helps explain why certain roles or environments feel disproportionately taxing. It’s not always about the workload or the people involved. Sometimes it’s about what the role resembles—earlier contexts where the cost of being visible, wrong, or unprepared felt genuinely high.

Professional life has a developmental history

We tend to think of our professional selves as separate from our psychological development. But careers have formative periods, too.

Early mentors, first failures, environments where we learned what was rewarded, punished, or ignored—these experiences quietly shape how we lead, speak, take risks, and respond to authority years later.

Most of us already accept this logic when it comes to parenting. We know that unexamined childhood experiences can spill into how we parent—how we discipline, soothe, or overcorrect.

Professional life follows the same pattern.

Unprocessed career experiences don’t show up as stories we consciously tell ourselves. They show up as leadership styles, communication habits, and emotional reflexes that can feel confusing in hindsight.

What effective leaders tend to notice

Leaders who navigate this terrain well aren’t necessarily the most confident or fearless. They’re often the most curious.

They notice when a reaction feels bigger than the situation warrants. They pause before assuming the problem is a lack of skill or effort. They’re willing to ask whether an old pattern is being activated—and whether it still fits the present context.

That kind of reflection doesn’t make leaders less decisive. If anything, it tends to make them steadier. Decisions become less reactive. Authority feels less charged. Visibility becomes tolerable rather than threatening.

Letting the present have more say

This isn’t about “fixing” yourself or endlessly revisiting the past. Most high-performing professionals are already capable, conscientious, and deeply invested in doing their work well.

What’s often missing isn’t insight, but the space to notice what’s being activated and to treat those reactions as information rather than directives.

Unexamined professional experiences tend to resurface indirectly: as tension, hesitation, over-effort, or a familiar sense of bracing. It’s easy to mistake those signals for evidence that something is wrong now, rather than residue from an earlier context.

Over time, what tends to change isn’t the absence of discomfort, but how much authority it’s given.

The past doesn’t disappear. It simply stops running the meeting. And for many people, that’s what makes work feel steadier again.