Why 69% of Drivers in 'Safe Driving' Programs Don't Actually Save Money
Usage based insurance sounds perfect on paper: you drive well, a black box or app proves it, and your premium drops. The reality looks very different when regulators, privacy advocates, and the Federal Trade Commission start pulling the data logs apart. A new Maryland Insurance Administration telematics report shows that most drivers in these programs did not get cheaper coverage, and a separate FTC action against General Motors and OnStar shows how easily your “safe driving” data can turn into a pricing weapon.
What Usage Based Insurance Really Does With Your Driving
Insurers sell usage based insurance on one idea: let us monitor your driving and we will reward you. Discounts are real for some people, and they matter in a world of climbing premiums. A 2025 global survey from telematics firm CMT found that savings are the number-one reason drivers sign up, with more than three-quarters of current users saying the discount is the main draw.
Photo by Vlad Deep on Unsplash
Maryland’s 2025 survey of major auto insurers shows how often that promise fizzles. Only about 31% of drivers in telematics programs actually paid less, 24% ended up paying more, and 45% saw no change at all, even after handing over a detailed log of every trip. Consumer advocates at the Consumer Federation of America looked at those numbers and said the industry’s big claims about savings are exaggerated at best. In plain English: many drivers trade privacy for nothing, and a quarter pay for the privilege.
The privacy risk is not theoretical. The FTC’s case against GM and OnStar describes driver behavior data and precise location pings, sometimes logged every three seconds, sold to consumer reporting agencies and used to set insurance rates. You think you are signing up for coaching and a small rebate; somewhere else, a file with your hard braking, night driving, and commute pattern turns into a higher quote.
When Saying Yes Actually Works for You
There are men who win with usage based insurance. If you drive low miles, stick to daylight, and keep speeds smooth, a telematics policy can undercut traditional pricing. Surveys from connected-insurance providers show strong interest among younger drivers who know they are being judged as high risk on age alone and want hard proof that they are better than the stereotype.
To stack the odds in your favor, you need three things in writing before you plug anything in or install an app. First, a clear discount guarantee: what you pay now, what happens in year one, and whether the base rate can jump even if you score well. Second, tight data rules: what is collected, who sees it, and how long it is kept. Maryland’s report found some insurers holding telematics data for years, which means old trips can haunt new quotes. Third, a clean exit: the right to leave the program, delete your data, and stop sharing without getting hammered at renewal.
My Verdict: Start From No, Then Make Insurers Earn Your Data
You should treat usage based insurance like handing a stranger your unlocked phone: default to no, then open up only if the deal is worth it on your terms. A telematics box or app makes sense for you only when the discount is guaranteed, the privacy rules are tight, and you can walk away without a secret score following you to the next insurer.
When a company wants your driving data, they are not doing you a favor. They are trying to price you with sniper-level precision. If they want that level of access to how, when, and where you drive, make them pay for it in clear savings, strict privacy promises, and a contract you control, not the other way around.