Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025 January 2026
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Trump's message to defense contractors: There might be a lot more money coming, but only if you deliver

A newly produced Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter at a hangar in Fort Worth, Texas
  • Trump sent a blunt message to defense contractors this week in social media posts and an executive order.
  • The Pentagon is getting tougher on slow contractors and shareholder-first actions.
  • Big defense primes are under pressure as startups see a rare opening.

President Donald Trump sent jolts through the defense industry this week by mixing talk of a $1.5 trillion defense budget with a blunt warning to contractors: Prioritize production and readiness, not Wall Street.

The apparent messaging behind a string of Truth Social posts, a new executive order, and the president's call for boosting the defense budget by 50% is that there's going to be a lot of cash on the table, but only for companies that produce and deliver weapons on time.

A venture capital investor focused on aerospace and defense told Business Insider that Trump is effectively saying: "I've got a really big pool of money here, but I'm only going to be giving it to people that are going to play ball."

The new executive order empowers the Pentagon to pressure contractors that it feels aren't moving fast enough and are perceived to instead be prioritizing profits for top executives and shareholder returns over production demands.

President Donald Trump stands alongside Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Gen. Dan Caine.

Turning up the pressure

The Pentagon is now authorized to crack down on underperforming defense contractors by limiting stock buybacks and dividends, linking executive pay to production and delivery, and using contract and emergency authorities to force faster output and investment.

There are questions about the degree to which the Department of Defense can influence company decisions, but it sends a clear signal that the government intends to at least try to tell weapons makers how to run their businesses.

"MILITARY EQUIPMENT IS NOT BEING MADE FAST ENOUGH," Trump wrote on social media this week before singling out the major defense firm Raytheon (now RTX Corp) in a follow-up post.

"Either Raytheon steps up," Trump wrote, urging the company to build more facilities and equipment, "or they will no longer be doing business with" the government. RTX is one of the world's leading producers of missiles like the Tomahawk cruise missile; it also makes radars and sensors, among other technologies.

It's extremely unusual to see this level of federal government involvement in contractor financial decisions.

"I've never seen anything like that," Jerry McGinn, the director of the Center for the Industrial Base at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, told Business Insider.

Defense stocks tumbled hard with the string of announcements but jumped as the Trump administration floated the possibility of a massive increase in defense spending, which would need Congress's approval.

An Apache helicopter ahead of the massive US airstrikes against ISIS.

Forcing a reset

This new push reflects growing concern that America’s defense sector has slipped, with capacity, capability, and experience today well below Cold War levels, leaving the US potentially ill-prepared for the possibility of a major war, such as a conflict with China.

The Trump administration appears to be trying to force a reset while also offering more money and more predictable demand, acknowledging the government itself has not always been a reliable customer. The hollowing out of the defense industry since the Cold War's end has left the federal government highly dependent on a few companies with the necessary industrial facilities to design and produce complex weapons on a large scale.

The administration has signaled from the get-go that the big established arms makers are in its crosshairs, with a dramatic shift in support toward agile start-ups over the primes, even if it's still making substantial business deals with them.

"We are going to completely disrupt the system that held the Army back for decades and lined the primes' pockets for so long," Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll said last year.

The Army's top civilian official previously said that he would like to see one of the big defense power players in the contracting world go out of business. And now there's increased pressure.

"The EO is more of a hammer," McGinn said of Trump's newest executive order targeting the US defense industrial base.

"It still raises a lot of questions about what's enforceable," he added, especially with some of the Truth Social mandates that weren't included in the executive order. But "the strategy is all about focusing on how do you change, how do you make it more attractive for companies to invest, to build factories ahead of need."

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth standing in front of a Department of War sign

Reshaping the market

With the president's new executive order on defense contracting, the companies that "stand to lose the most" are "the existing primes," Justus Parmar, CEO of Fortuna Investments, an America-first venture capital firm, told Business Insider.

"Legacy defense companies," Parmar said, "they're kind of like taxicabs. They need a bit of disruption." He sees the rising defense firms like the ride-share companies that changed the game.

The primes, the biggest defense contractors, are far from powerless. Their scale, capital, and decades of experience give them room to resist pressure, and in certain defense technologies, they remain the only game in town.

Lockheed Martin, for instance, is still producing F-35 stealth fighters, Huntington Ingalls Industries is still building aircraft carriers, and Boeing has a major contract for the new sixth-generation F-47 fighter jet.

While some big companies didn't respond, others signaled a willingness to engage. Lockheed Martin, for instance, said it "shares President Trump's and the Department of War's focus on speed, accountability, and results, and will continue to invest and innovate at scale to ensure our warfighters maintain a decisive advantage and are never sent into a fair fight."

The newcomers, the start-ups and rising firms making big plays "have the most to gain" from what's unfolding right now, Parmar said, calling the latest Trump moves a "tide shift."

Palmer Luckey, the founder of Anduril, said this week that he "broadly" supports the president's agenda, saying that "it's good to scare people sometimes." Anduril has been pitting itself up against major defense contractors in areas of emerging tech, like collaborative combat aircraft, advanced drones designed to operate alongside piloted fighters.

A US airman aims a Dronebuster at a quadcopter drone.

McGinn said "there's a strong recognition that we need to get more out of our defense industrial base and we need new entrants." New technology spaces like drones, counter-drone systems, and command and control architecture improvements are opening the doors for new players, particularly those that move fast.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth laid out the administration's approach last November, briefing industry CEOs and releasing a new acquisition strategy aimed at overhauling what it calls an outdated system and a weakened defense industrial base.

Hegseth has said his focus is on building the "arsenal of freedom" to better prepare the US military for modern warfare.

The plan is aimed at accelerating modernization, rapidly expanding production, surging capacity, and putting military acquisition and industry on a "wartime footing" that favors speed and execution over process.

This process takes time though, Parmar said. "The existing primes, they're entrenched. They're not going anywhere quickly."

"It's going to be a slow bleed," he said," a slow transition until some of these other companies start to get market share."

Read the original article on Business Insider
Ria.city






Read also

Deal with it, Green Bay: The Bears have turned the tables on the Packers at last (or have they?)

US launches strikes against ISIS targets in Syria

Hochul, AOC, Mamdani slam ‘we support Hamas’ chants at Queens protest: ‘Disgusting and antisemitic’

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here




Sports today


Новости тенниса


Спорт в России и мире


All sports news today





Sports in Russia today


Новости России


Russian.city



Губернаторы России









Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city





Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости