Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025 January 2026
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Marriage Pact sends cease and desist to Date Drop

Looking for love? Luckily for Stanford students hunting for the “one,” two student-founded platforms have answered the call.

However, in November, matchmaking start-up Marriage Pact sent a cease-and-desist letter to the recently-founded Date Drop, alleging similarities in website, marketing copy and parts of the matching questionnaire.

Marriage Pact, founded in 2019 by Liam McGregor ’20 and Sophia Sterling-Angus ’19, uses a ranking algorithm to pair students with a “backup spouse” each year. Students answer questions about topics ranging from dating preferences to political opinions, with the website offering them a potential partner based on their responses.

Meanwhile, Date Drop, founded by Henry Weng ’25 M.S. ’26 in the fall, matches participants on a weekly basis. After filling in a questionnaire a single time, users can opt in every Tuesday to receive a match in their inbox.

According to exhibits sent to The Daily by Marriage Pact, Weng reopened dozens of Marriage Pact emails from August to September 2025 before the launch of his product.

In an email to The Daily, Marriage Pact claimed that Date Drop copied several marketing materials, including the “secret admirer” mechanism, the phrasing of the “match results” email and elements of their website.

Marriage Pact also alleged that around 25% of the Date Drop questionnaire was copied.

Marriage Pact claims that marketing materials were copied, such as the “secret admirer” mechanism (Courtesy of Marriage Pact)
Alleged similarities between Marriage Pact and Date Drop’s websites include parts of the privacy policy (Courtesy of Marriage Pact).

“We can’t say much, pending litigation,” wrote McGregor in an email to the Daily. “But [Weng] looked at Marriage Pact emails going back all four years before launching.”

Weng believes the two projects should be able to coexist. “Marriage Pact is a beloved campus tradition. Date Drop is designed to help students find meaningful connections on an ongoing basis. We believe there is room for both,” Weng wrote in an email to the Daily.

According to Weng, questions in the Date Drop questionnaire are not uncommon among matchmaking tools. However, “as a good-faith gesture to address the concerns raised, [Date Drop has] made some voluntary product updates,” he wrote. Weng noted that Date Drop has since retained outside counsel.

Intellectual property scholar Mark Lemley ’88, a professor at Stanford Law School, believes the case is one of ordinary competition. “There’s nothing actually illegal about copying a business model,” he said. “People do that all the time.”

As for the claim that parts of the questionnaire were copied, “I don’t think that’s the sort of thing that’s going to be copyrightable,” Lemley said.

In his work as an intellectual property lawyer, Lemley said that he frequently sees similar cases. According to Lemley, the cases typically have one of two outcomes: either the defendant is unable to fight the accusation, in which case they acquiesce, or — as in the case of Date Drop — the battle may go to court. “I think if they fight, they’d have a good chance,” Lemley said. 

Another possibility is that the parties reach a compromise, he said. Date Drop’s recent changes to some of its questions may constitute part of such a solution.

To show a trademark violation, “the plaintiff [Marriage Pact] would have to prove that the design of the website or the brand name are sufficiently similar” to the extent that “people would be confused and think that this actually came from the plaintiff,” Lemley said. However, he believes that to be unlikely in the case of Marriage Pact and Date Drop.

Meanwhile, to show copyright infringement, “the plaintiff would have to show that the defendant took their creative expression” beyond standard elements of website design and marketing. Plaintiffs would also be eligible to seek damages if they could demonstrate that the company suffered a financial loss due to the similar materials, Lemley said.

“There [are] a lot of great things worth doing to create meaningful relationships on campus,” McGregor wrote. “We’d just prefer everyone do their own thing.”

As for Date Drop, Weng and his colleagues have no plans to cease operations. “We’re here to help people connect, and that’s what we’ll keep on doing,” he wrote.

The post Marriage Pact sends cease and desist to Date Drop appeared first on The Stanford Daily.

Ria.city






Read also

Playoff-bound Bills sign kicker Matthew Wright to practice squad with Matt Prater’s status uncertain

Julia Hornstein wins Martha Coman Award for best new journalist

Austin Rivers Compares Jaylen Brown, Jayson Tatum To Legendary NBA Duo

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here




Sports today


Новости тенниса


Спорт в России и мире


All sports news today





Sports in Russia today


Новости России


Russian.city



Губернаторы России









Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city





Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости