Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Kurtenbach: Buster Posey’s big Rafael Devers trade is a statement — the SF Giants are done playing second fiddle

Last week, I asked a simple question:

What makes the 2025 Giants Buster Posey’s team?

Well, a few days later, we have the answer.

Posey’s bold, brash, and perhaps even reckless trade for three-time All-Star slugger Rafael Devers on Sunday is a big black-and-orange stamp from the new director of baseball operations on the Giants organization.

Here’s what I’m about. 

The trade also made a statement to the fanbase and the rest of baseball: The Giants are done acting like anything less than the single big-league team in the richest metro area in America. They’re done trying to beat the Dodgers in the margins — they have the muscle and they’re going to flex it. After years of pushing fiscal prudence and not earnestly trying to keep up with the Joneses, Posey is done pretending anything else but the team in blue matters.

Devers, who has a cool quarter of a billion — $250 million — remaining on a deal that runs through 2033 for the player and until 2043 with deferred payments for the team, is coming to San Francisco for Jordan Hicks, Kyle Harrison, and two minor leaguers. The Giants will take on every penny of what remains on Devers’ contract.

Is it a bit of conspicuous consumption? You bet.

Might the Giants want this move back in a few years? Perhaps.

But Posey is right: nothing matters but beating the Dodgers. And the Dodgers don’t worry about a contract like Devers’. So the Giants shouldn’t either.

The former catcher’s competitiveness is legendary. It was the driving force behind titles.

And we now have clear evidence of it manifesting in his new gig.

The goal is to close the gap, and the gap was huge. You can’t look at the Dodgers’ lineup and then the Giants’ this past weekend and think anything different.

But while Matt Chapman, Willy Adames, and Rafael Devers aren’t on the level of Shohei Ohtani, Mookie Betts, and Freddie Freeman, at least they can share a National League All-Star team locker room (and perhaps tips for how to invest their insane amounts of money).

This is the kind of deal that the Giants had to make, just like Posey had to roll a head a few weeks back.

The post-shake-up boost was waning. And while that’s not a valid reason to take on a quarter of a billion dollars, the questions of “what next?” that stemmed from that shakeup required more than just another Farhan Zaidi-like move. Dom Smith — as good a guy and as decent a player as he might be — isn’t going to lift the Giants over the Dodgers in the standings.

Another statement I made last week, before Game 1 of the Dodgers’ series — which the Giants lost 2-1 to fall two games back in the National League West: “Just just because the Giants are doing better than anyone should have reasonably expected doesn’t mean that this is the time to rest on the team’s laurels.”

Posey certainly did not do that.

This deal has surely been brewing for a little bit. Giants television analyst Mike Krukow said on KNBR that Posey recently asked him which of the team’s three young pitchers — Landon Roupp, Hayden Birdsong, or Kyle Harrison — was going to be the best. Might he have been gauging trade value? The opportunity to move Harrison — Krukow’s pick, for what it’s worth — as the centerpiece of a deal for a player like Devers doesn’t come around often.

And let’s be abundantly clear here: the trade package sent to Boston for Devers is embarrassingly light. In Harrison and Jordan Kicks, the Giants jettisoned two pitchers who are probably relievers at best (Hicks was already moved to the bullpen this season.) The Giants have only one untouchable minor-league prospect, and Bryce Eldridge is still safely stashed in Sacramento. Finances aside, this was a coup of a trade.

Boston just wanted to unload Devers’ contract. The Giants are willing buyers. If Devers were a free agent last year, he would have landed a similar deal. I’m sure the Giants would have extended an offer.

I’m not so sure Devers would have accepted it.

Which is why Posey’s trade deserves accolades, not hand-wringing.

If the Giants can’t buy players like Devers in free agency and they can’t create them in their farm system (at least at the current moment), then they’ll have to add them via trade. It’s that or simply not having elite-level players.

Unfortunately, situations like the Devers deal — a team looking to jettison a fair-market contract for an elite bat but not expecting a high-level return — come up rarely.

If Posey didn’t pounce on this deal, how would the Giants — with their bottom-of-the-barrel farm system — have added a player like Devers in the coming weeks or even the coming years?

There’s a similarity to the Warriors’ Jimmy Butler trade here: A weird situation, with the Bay Area team being the right team in the right place at the right time.

Like with Butler, it’s not as if the Giants are acquiring a truly distressed asset. The problems that made Butler expendable in Miami ceased to exist the second the Warriors acquired him and signed him to the extension he wanted from the Heat.

Devers’ issues that led to his trade should be left in Boston — the Giants aren’t signing a third baseman to take his job without consulting him; they already have a third baseman on a long-term deal in Matt Chapman (whose injury might have expedited things a bit, here).

We can all agree can all agree this will probably not be a good deal in the not-too-distant future. Devers isn’t much of a fielder, his preferred (to the point he was traded) position of third base is blocked, and if his bat slows down even a bit (he swings as fast as Adames — a cautionary tale), his value tanks.

But I have a two-word retort for such thinking: Who cares?

What did the Giants lose in this trade? The biggest loss is money, on which the Giants should be plenty set.

And what did they gain? Only the left-handed middle-of-the-order bat this team — which, again, is competing not just for a playoff spot but the National League West — desperately needed.

If ownership — and don’t forget that Posey is a part-owner of the team — isn’t worried enough about the financial aspects of Devers’ contract to prevent this trade, then no fan should be worried for them.

What did all the fiscal prudence over the last few years earn the fans? Tickets, concessions, hats, and parking didn’t go down in price because the Giants weren’t spending as much as they could.

If Posey didn’t take advantage of this situation — and the trade package says nothing if not “I’m taking advantage of you” — one would have to question his competitiveness.

Luckily, that’s something that we’ll never have to do.

After years of lowering standards, the man in charge wants it as bad as the fans in the stands, and he’s acting on those urges.

What more could you possibly want?

Ria.city






Read also

Liverpool have no chance of Champions League progress against Real Madrid, says Paul Merson

AI photo match reunites Texas woman with lost cat after 103 days

Public sector union facing at least three lawsuits from executives it suspended

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here




Sports today


Новости тенниса


Спорт в России и мире


All sports news today





Sports in Russia today


Новости России


Russian.city



Губернаторы России









Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city





Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости