Add news
March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Is Boardsi up in your LinkedIn DMs? Here’s why that cushy corporate board seat won’t soon be yours

Over the past month, multiple reporters at the Daily Dot have received a spate of tantalizing DMs on LinkedIn, offering the kind of roles top-level executives only dream of. 

Last month, I got a LinkedIn message from Lisa W., saying she’d “love” to hop on a video call. 

“Your background matches some of our paid board and advisory positions that we have been retained to do a search for and present candidates to,” Lisa wrote. 

Others came from Sara, similarly exuberant and eager to connect.

“I’ve been getting those too nonstop,” another Daily Dot reporter noted. “They’re relentless.” 

The offers, from a start-up called Boardsi, seemed dubious. 

The company hinted that it worked with Fortune 500 firms like Starbucks, national banks, and popular airlines to put people on their corporate boards.

Did they really want to talk to journalists about joining the governance team of a multinational conglomerate company, where seats pay high six-figures and decisions shift billions in stock price? 

No.

The much-too-wide net Boardsi (pronounced “board-sigh”) cast is by design. As is the prominent placement of name-brand businesses, which don’t actually engage Boardsi’s service. 

The company bills itself as a matchmaking platform for companies in need of board members and ambitious professionals seeking board positions. And it is waging a relentless LinkedIn campaign to attract clients for its service. 

The pitch leaves many prospective customers skeptical—and not without reason.

Former clients say they paid hundreds of dollars to access Boardsi, which provided, in their view, mediocre services and did not yield any board seats. Other online reviewers say they were rebuffed when they asked for documentation or further information on their introductory calls.

Some users, though, really did end up with board seats that have furthered their careers. 

But not without first annoying almost everyone on LinkedIn. 

“If Lisa Williams or Sara Molina or anyone else contacts you from Boardsi, based on my research, it is is a scam,” wrote one irritated attorney. “Boardsi is committing bait and switch and I will be contacting relevant authorities.”

At its face, the idea of a board matchmaking service is simple: Companies need advisors with specific expertise, and many experienced executives want to burnish their resume while earning the supplemental income a board position offers. 

Publicly traded companies and major brands rely on connections and established search firms to fill out boards, which vote on compensation packages, steer overall business strategy, and offer guidance to senior executives. 

But for smaller, private companies, a non-traditional service can make sense. 

Search firms, however, are paid by their corporate clients, not the people they’re trying to hire. Boardsi flips that structure, putting the financial risk on the people hoping to get placed on a board. 

Subscribers to Boardsi pay a $195 startup fee and a monthly subscription of $49 or $195 for access to the site’s portal, where they can find board listings from corporate clients to apply for. The companies pay only a small success fee on the backend.

Pay-to-play recruitment and branding models have a checkered reputation, but Boardsi founder and CEO Martin Rowinski said having the customers pay was the only way to make the business work. 

“When we got the companies on the phone, one of the first things they would say is, ‘Is this going to cost me an arm and leg?’” Rowinski told the Daily Dot. 

This system passes the bulk of the financial risk to the consumer while also ensuring any board seat available on the platform comes from a firm that would rather not pay upfront to find suitable clients. 

Rowinski claimed that the platform averages 4,500 to 5,800 active clients and 500 to 750 board-level listings at any given time, but declined to share documentation verifying these figures. 

The concept has worked out for some. The Daily Dot spoke with Dallas-area tech executive Lou Gasco, who in 2023 was working as a product manager and wanted to further his career by joining a board. After receiving ads and cold emails from Boardsi, he gave it a shot, advertising himself as an expert helping executives better leverage technology.

Within a month of joining the service, Gasco connected with British analytics firm AlternativeSoft, where he has happily served as a board member ever since.

The Daily Dot found at least a few other positive reviews online from executives who, LinkedIn shows, now serve on boards. These people did not respond to requests for comment. 

“It may be weird, but their business model is pretty simple,” Gasco said. “They have a job board focused on directorships.” 

But Boardsi doesn’t exactly brand itself as a job board through its aggressive advertising. 

The LinkedIn message Daily Dot reporters received hinted that Boardsi had specific positions for which they would be an immediate fit. Rowinski claimed this was a fair portrayal, given the array of industries he said are available on the portal. 

Boardsi’s website featured logos from major companies like Starbucks, M&T Bank, and Southwest Airlines, implying Boardsi had openings on the boards of those big firms. 

In reality, Rowinski said, people who worked at those companies had used Boardsi’s platform. The logos were removed after the Daily Dot reached out to the companies to verify if they had a corporate relationship with Boardsi. 

As for why the company recruited a spate of journalists, Rowinski said LinkedIn’s search tools picked up the keyword “director” in my profile—a rather nebulous business term. He confirmed that this strategy attracts plenty of prospective clients who are not ideal board candidates. 

For those clients who may not be ready for a board position, Boardsi provides branding services, like designing a resume focused on corporate governance and posting a biography in its in-house online magazine LEADIFI

The company also offers online courses in board leadership, though the certificate program is not yet accredited. 

But it is the prospect of a board seat, particularly a paid one, that draws in customers.

“What attracts people is the end result of the journey,” Rowinski said. 

Some clients left the service unimpressed by both the journey and the end result. 

Mike, a government relations executive based in Europe, was hesitant to join Boardsi when he first received a LinkedIn message. The price wasn’t prohibitive for him, though, and he decided to trial the service for a few months. 

But things turned sour soon after, as the company shuffled Mike between a few different contacts and prepared a new board-focused CV even though he already had one. 

“It very quickly became pretty amateurish,” Mike, who asked to have his last name withheld for privacy reasons, told the Daily Dot. 

Boardsi representatives told Mike it would take time to find the right organizations, but he canceled his subscription after a few months of searching and hundreds of dollars in fees yielded no results. Within days of Mike leaving a negative review on Boardsi’s TrustPilot page, the company refunded him. 

Kimberly Lucas, a recruiting executive in Colorado, reported a similar experience. 

Lucas said she had a very professional intake interview with Boardsi, but the profile the company created for her was riddled with errors and misspellings.

“My profile ended up being a really bad kind of copy-paste of my LinkedIn profile,” she told the Daily Dot. “I wanted it down immediately.”

Lucas, too, secured a refund after leaving a scathing review on TrustPilot. 

Anonymous reports from Reddit, LinkedIn, and TrustPilot contained similar warnings. Anyone searching “Boardsi complaints” or “Boardsi scam” on Google will find plenty of ammunition. 

Rowinski countered that disgruntled reviews never gave the service a fair shake. During the interview, he shared his screen and matched a number of negative reviews from TrustPilot to people on Boardsi’s CRM platform who participated in an intake interview but never actually used the service. 

Gasco, who still gets regular LinkedIn messages from skeptics after leaving a testimonial on Boardsi’s website, said consumers are often confused, likely looking for consulting roles and not board seats.

Rowinski, too, conceded that dissatisfied clients often complain they were sold false expectations in the initial meeting, or come into the program with their own idea about how quickly they will get a board seat. (He told the Daily Dot that Boardsi retrains salespeople who get carried away.) 

Many other online reviews, however, complain not that Boardsi promised too much, but that the company wouldn’t share enough information—whether that’s placement data, proof of success, or payment and refund details. 

Rowinski said he couldn’t provide exact numbers when asked about the number of executives placed on board seats. He also declined to facilitate interviews with either corporate or individual clients who have had success using Boardsi “due to confidentiality agreements and our commitment to client privacy,” despite readily outing dissatisfied customers to the Daily Dot.

Asked how long a typical executive stays on the platform before finding a seat, he estimated seven months to a year, but added that some have been on the platform for three years, which would amount to thousands of dollars in fees. 

Rowinski also admitted that Boardsi has urged clients to give positive reviews on TrustPilot, many of which the customers seemed to post before securing any kind of board seat. 

Many of the reviews discuss intake and not actual employment. The onus to get hired still seems to fall on the customers. 

And whether every random LinkedIn user DMed is actually a fit appears irrelevant to Boardsi, prioritizing quantity over quality, given the company profits when people sign up, not when they get an actual job. 

Boardsi may work well for some candidates. But its business strategy rests not on success but sign-ups. 

Which means you can probably expect the unwanted DMs to continue.


Internet culture is chaotic—but we’ll break it down for you in one daily email. Sign up for the Daily Dot’s web_crawlr newsletter here. You’ll get the best (and worst) of the internet straight into your inbox.

Sign up to receive the Daily Dot’s Internet Insider newsletter for urgent news from the frontline of online.

The post Is Boardsi up in your LinkedIn DMs? Here’s why that cushy corporate board seat won’t soon be yours appeared first on The Daily Dot.

Ria.city






Read also

Police hunt gunman who killed two at US university

Family remembers Katie and Noah Carrig, reacts to death of alleged killer

Rams have playoff-clinching opportunity against Lions

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here




Sports today


Новости тенниса


Спорт в России и мире


All sports news today





Sports in Russia today


Новости России


Russian.city



Губернаторы России









Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city





Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости