• I attended Legalweek, an annual gathering of thousands of legal professionals in New York City.
• The potential of artificial intelligence to reshape the legal profession emerged as a key theme.
• Speakers issued stern warnings that a failure to adopt new tech will leave lawyers in the dust.

On the first day of Legalweek, a conference where thousands of lawyers gather to hobnob with their peers and explore the latest tech, Max Junestrand, clad in a black overcoat that highlighted his 6-foot-3-inch stature, stepped out of his hotel, ready to seize the day.

Long viewed as Luddites, law firms and corporate lawyers have begun to adopt artificial intelligence to deliver better service faster and cheaper. This has led to a Cambrian explosion of startups trying to sell tools for drafting contracts and tracking billable hours. Junestrand's startup, Legora, helps legal professionals work smarter with a digital workspace built on top of large language models.

Earlier in the day, Legora jacked up its battle with a chief competitor by announcing in the trade papers that it had signed Goodwin, a leading law firm for tech deals, as a client. It also opened a new office in New York City, the Swedish-born company's first outpost outside Europe. Later in the day, Junestrand would join his employees in Times Square to watch Legora's logo light up the iconic Nasdaq MarketSite screen.

"We don't build Legora so law firms can check the box on doing AI," Junestrand said, sitting at Legora's event booth. "We want to transform and rethink what it means to do great legal work."

'Lawyers are dinosaurs'

At Legalweek at the New York Hilton Midtown, artificial intelligence was on trial, scrutinized with the precision of a shark litigator. Behind closed doors, lawyers spoke on panels about the coming "death of legal busywork" and the costs of fake legal cases making their way into real briefs. In the exhibition hall, software engineers wearing slacks and pencil skirts tried to woo lawyers with promises to shave off hours of work without killing the billable hour.

I learned that Junestrand, the Legora founder, has an uphill battle ahead of him. Selling software to lawyers isn't the same as shilling to sales reps or programmers. Lawyers work mostly out of documents. Before the arrival of large-scale language models, software wasn't very good at extracting data from text. So the tools weren't all that useful.

Junestrand said the advent of large models trained mostly on textual data changed everything. Now, these models can parse and understand complex legal documents, streamlining tasks like legal research and contract review. But for all the hype around virtual paralegals at Legalweek, numerous lawyers said the adoption of the tech has been slow.

"Lawyers are dinosaurs," an employment lawyer said over a catered lunch of beet salad and deli sandwiches. The Philadelphia attorney said when she gets a contract by email, she likes to print it and mark it up with a pen. When she's done, she files it away. That's how she's been doing things since the dictaphone.

Tech savants want to work with lawyers like them

Later in the week, dozens of attendees poured into a dimly lit conference room for a panel discussion on how legal teams can start using artificial intelligence. Panelist Amy Sellars, an attorney at the business law firm Gunster, told lawyers to ask vendors for demos and make it easy for people in their firms to experiment with new tools.

"Lawyers need to wake up," said Todd Itami, an attorney at the large legal defense firm Covington & Burling, saying that learning to use artificial intelligence was "imperative" for their success.

Younger lawyers may be more receptive to Itami's call to action. Aaron Crews, a partner at the global law firm Holland & Knight, places lawyers on a bell curve with early adopters and laggards on the far ends and the rest in the middle. Law students and junior associates often try new products before most others.

The tech-savvy standouts in their programs, according to Crews, are likelier to want to work for firms that take a friendlier stance toward new tech. This means the top firms won't be sought after for long if they fall behind the times.

Have a tip? Contact the reporter via email at mrussell@businessinsider.com or Signal at @MeliaRussell.01. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk's losing streak continued on Wednesday.

Hours after Republicans in Wisconsin lost a state Supreme Court race in Wisconsin where Musk spent tens of millions of dollars of his own money, shares of his flagship electric car company fell upon news that it had badly missed Wall Street estimates for the number of vehicles it had delivered in the first quarter of 2025.

As reported by Market Watch, Tesla revealed that "it delivered more than 336,000 vehicles during the first quarter, down from 387,000 deliveries a year ago."

To put this number into context, Market Watch notes that it "was well below the average analyst estimate compiled by FactSet of 404,000 vehicles" and it "was also lower than the 'whisper' number, or what Wall Street was quietly expecting, with even the most bullish analyst projecting a number in the 360,000 range."

ALSO READ: 'Mad king': Trump baffles observers by suggesting he'll tariff illegal drugs

Although Tesla blamed the disappointing deliveries on what Market Watch describes as "the changeover to refreshed Model Y production lines" that "led to several weeks of lost production," it's also a reality that the company has been the target of a concerted boycott campaign led by progressive groups to protest Musk's role as the head of President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency.

Sales of Tesla in Europe have fallen off a cliff in recent months, as car buyers on that continent have revolted against Musk's support for far-right political parties such as Germany's Alternative für Deutschland.