None of the finalists for a new Illinois state flag bears the motto: Pay to Play.

But a story about campaign donations from Sun-Times reporters Robert Herguth and Mitchell Armentrout shows that the state hasn't reached a point where Illinoisans can feel confident the days of pay to play are in the past.

Pay to play is when elected or appointed officials allow donations, jobs or other favors to sway the state's lawmaking or policy choices. Obviously, those entrusted with this power by the voters should avoid even the appearance of pay to play.

Yet the system was on display during the recent controversy over failed legislation to strictly regulate the sale of delta-8 THC and other synthetic, intoxicating hemp products. In a correlation between donations and official actions that often is seen in Springfield, political figures blocked the legislation — backed by Gov. JB Pritzker — after accepting donations from groups that would benefit.

Those donations just happened to come in the months before the latest showdown over the legislation. (The bill had previously passed last year in the Senate but failed in the House.)

The hemp products are often in copycat snack products that especially appeal to young people and have sickened children in hundreds of cases nationwide. As this board has said before, the products, generally sold in smoke shops, gas stations and convenience stores, need to be kept from children.

Among the donation recipients was Illinois House Speaker Emanuel "Chris" Welch, who refused to call the Pritzker-backed measure for a vote. Pritzker claimed the "vast majority" of House Democrats and Republicans would have approved the measure. He also said, "This is a demonstration, from my perspective, of the power of special interests and the money that they spread around to thwart the health and safety of the public." A Welch spokesperson said the bill didn't have enough votes to pass.

Donations on all sides

The cannabis industry, which faces competition from businesses that sell unregulated hemp products, also has donated money to legislators, including lawmakers who backed the hemp legislation

For example, ICANN, a political action committee linked to the Cannabis Business Association, has contributed at least $285,000 to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle since 2020.

Charles Wu, a lobbyist for the Illinois Hemp Business Association, told the Sun-Times, "Both hemp and cannabis organizations, who are on opposite sides of this issue, have contributed to many different campaigns. With millions of dollars being spent on campaigns in Illinois, it is hard to believe that a few relatively minor contributions would influence someone's major policy positions."

Unfortunately, it's not that hard to believe at all.

Marijuana was legalized in Illinois several years ago, but it is highly regulated, whereas intoxicating hemp products are not. In recent years, poison centers have reported thousands of encounters with users of delta-8 THC users, which is not quite as potent as cannabis but still produces a high.

Did all those donations change any votes? No one knows for certain, except the legislators themselves. But it remains clear that Illinois' rules on campaign donations have too many loopholes. At times, donors find ways to obscure their identities so the public can't always see who is trying to put a thumb on the scale in Springfield. Tons of political cash have poured into recent Illinois races.

Lawmakers make decisions all the time about what legislation to support. Accepting campaign donations is not illegal. Donations help pay for the costs of running for office. Some reforms have been enacted.

But what are voters to think when the actions of officeholders appear to be aligned with the interests of those who give them money? What's needed is a system in which it doesn't appear campaign donations are creating a conflict of interest.

Illinois calls itself the Land of Lincoln, "Honest Abe." It should act more like it.

Send letters to letters@suntimes.com

More about the Sun-Times Editorial Board at chicago.suntimes.com/about/editorial-board

Get Opinions content delivered to your inbox. Sign up for our weekly newsletter here.

The draft is three weeks away now. GM Ryan Poles and head coach Ben Johnson have pieced together an off-season that is earning widespread praise across the league. The question is whether they can stick the landing with their 1st round pick in the draft. Current projections have the top three picks likely being a mix of Cam Ward, Travis Hunter, and Abdul Carter. After that, it gets tricky. People in Chicago want to know where running back Ashton Jeanty will end once the dust settles.

Widespread belief has been that the Las Vegas Raiders are the heavy favorites to take him at 6th overall, with New Orleans at #9 also being a possibility. It makes sense. Las Vegas’ best option right now is a 33-year-old Raheem Mostert. New Orleans knows Alvin Kamara turns 30 in July. Both teams need to think about the future at that position. Both have head coaches who like to run the ball. One thing is clear. A source told SM that those around the league believe one thing is certain.

“He likely won’t get passed Chicago if he falls that far.”

Ashton Jeanty is a strong probability for the Bears.

Whispers from Halas Hall indicate they love the Boise State star. It isn’t hard to see why. He nearly broke Barry Sanders’ single-season rushing record in 2024, nearly winning the Heisman in the process. The guy carried his team to the college football playoffs. He’s built like a brick house with power, speed, contact balance, and vision. There aren’t any truly glaring weaknesses in his game. He’s earned comparisons to the likes of LaDainian Tomlinson and Marshawn Lynch. The Bears haven’t had a back of that caliber since Matt Forte.

Try to imagine what this offense could look like with Ashton Jeanty, Rome Odunze, D.J. Moore, and Cole Kmet all as options for quarterback Caleb Williams. Throw all of it into Johnson’s offense, and you can understand why some people around the league aren’t wild about the idea. They are quietly hoping Jeanty goes somewhere else. One thing is certain. If he gets past the Raiders, the noise will get loud in a hurry. It would mark the first time in 20 years the Bears have taken a running back in the 1st round.