The Indispensable Role of the JAG Corps in Modern Warfare

In an era defined by artificial intelligence, cyberwarfare, and precision-guided munitions, the U.S. military faces increasingly complex challenges on the battlefield. These challenges are not solely tactical but also legal, ethical, and strategic. Recent comments by Pete Hegseth during his confirmation hearing—referring dismissively to the Judge Advocate General’s Corps (JAG) as “JAG-offs”—risk undermining public understanding of the critical role military lawyers play in today’s armed forces. Such remarks are not only disparaging but deeply misguided, particularly in light of the unique contributions the JAG Corps makes to national security and the rule of law.

As warfare evolves, the expertise provided by military legal professionals is more essential than ever. From ensuring compliance with international law to advising commanders on ethically fraught decisions, JAG officers operate at the intersection of law, policy, and military strategy. To dismiss their role is to disregard a cornerstone of our military’s integrity and operational effectiveness.

The Complexities of Modern Warfare

The nature of modern warfare is unrecognizable compared to even a few decades ago. Cyberattacks can cripple national infrastructure without a single shot being fired. Autonomous weapons raise questions about accountability and proportionality in conflict. Advances in surveillance and artificial intelligence pose profound ethical dilemmas about privacy and targeting. Each of these scenarios requires not only technological expertise but also a robust understanding of the law of armed conflict (LOAC), the Geneva Conventions, and other legal frameworks.

The JAG Corps is uniquely equipped to navigate these challenges. JAG officers provide commanders with real-time legal advice, helping them distinguish lawful military actions from those that could result in war crimes, diplomatic fallout, or long-term damage to U.S. credibility. Far from being an impediment to operational success, these legal advisors enable the military to act decisively while upholding the rule of law—a critical component of winning wars in both the physical and moral dimensions.

Ethics and Strategy in the Age of Technology

Consider the use of drone strikes, a hallmark of 21st-century warfare. JAG officers play a vital role in determining whether a strike complies with LOAC principles, such as necessity, proportionality, and distinction. These legal professionals ensure that the targets are legitimate military objectives, that civilian casualties are minimized, and that operations align with international norms. This oversight is not merely a bureaucratic formality; it is a safeguard that protects the United States from accusations of indiscriminate violence, which can erode alliances and fuel enemy propaganda.

Similarly, in the realm of cyberwarfare, JAG officers provide indispensable guidance on how to conduct operations within the bounds of international law. For example, a cyberattack on an adversary’s power grid might constitute a violation of LOAC if it disproportionately harms civilians. JAG officers help commanders weigh these considerations, ensuring that operations are not only effective but also defensible in the court of public opinion and international law.

Guardians of Accountability

The military’s moral authority rests on its adherence to the rule of law, even in the face of adversaries who disregard it. The JAG Corps serves as the institutional conscience of the armed forces, ensuring that the United States does not compromise its values in pursuit of victory.

Historical examples underscore this point. During the Iraq War, allegations of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib severely damaged America’s reputation and provided fodder for enemy recruitment. In contrast, when military lawyers successfully prosecuted those responsible for the abuses, it sent a powerful message that the United States holds itself accountable, even in the fog of war. Such actions reaffirm the nation’s commitment to justice and strengthen the legitimacy of its military operations.

In today’s battlespace, where information warfare and propaganda are as important as kinetic operations, maintaining this moral high ground is not optional—it is a strategic imperative. JAG officers are the guardians of this principle, ensuring that the United States operates with integrity in the most challenging circumstances.

Building Trust in a Polarized World

Hegseth’s dismissive comments risk undermining the public trust in an institution that is vital to the military’s mission. At a time when the United States faces strategic competition from authoritarian regimes like China and Russia, which flout international norms, the JAG Corps represents the values that set the United States apart. Upholding the rule of law is not a weakness; it is a strength that demonstrates to allies and adversaries alike that the United States is committed to fairness, justice, and accountability.

Moreover, the JAG Corps serves as a crucial check on power within the military itself. By providing commanders with objective legal advice, JAG officers ensure that decisions are made within the framework of law and ethics, reducing the risk of abuse and enhancing the legitimacy of military actions. This role is especially important in a polarized domestic environment, where the military must remain above partisan politics and maintain the trust of the American people.

A Call for Respect and Recognition

To dismiss the JAG Corps as irrelevant or obstructionist is to fundamentally misunderstand its role in the modern military. JAG officers are not “JAG-offs” as Hegseth flippantly described them; they are dedicated professionals who navigate some of the most complex and consequential issues in today’s battlespace. They ensure that the United States remains a leader not only in military power but also in moral authority.

Rather than disparaging the JAG Corps, military and civilian leaders should champion its work. They should recognize that the challenges of modern warfare demand not less legal expertise but more. As the battlefield continues to evolve, so too must our appreciation for the legal and ethical frameworks that guide it. The JAG Corps is not a hindrance to military success—it is an enabler of it, ensuring that the United States fights and wins wars in a manner consistent with its values.

In the end, the strength of the U.S. military lies not only in its advanced technology or superior tactics but also in its commitment to justice and accountability. The JAG Corps embodies this commitment, and its work is more vital today than ever before. Let us respect and empower these professionals, whose contributions to national security are as profound as they are indispensable.

(Disclaimer: The views presented in this work do not represent those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Army, or any other segment of the United States Government.)

The post The Indispensable Role of the JAG Corps in Modern Warfare appeared first on Small Wars Journal by Arizona State University.