March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010
August 2010
September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Has TikTok made us better? Or much, much worse?

2
Vox

For years, murmurs of a US TikTok ban have left users and creators furious and terrified that a social media app that had become central to their lives could be taken away. Again and again, the ban never actually materialized, and users continued to enjoy what had, since 2018, become one of the most creative, vital, and paradigm-shifting developments in internet culture. 

But this is no longer a “boy who cried wolf” situation. On Friday, the Supreme Court signaled that it would uphold the law signed by President Biden last April requiring TikTok’s Beijing-based parent company ByteDance to divest TikTok from its Chinese ownership or risk facing a ban in the US. 

As of now, TikTok plans to comply by completely shutting down its app in the US on January 19 unless the Supreme Court intervenes in its favor, which appears increasingly unlikely after Friday’s oral arguments. And despite the reported interest in buying the company from Shark Tank’s Kevin O’Leary and billionaire Frank McCourt, ByteDance has said TikTok isn’t for sale. 

Nobody knows what a world without TikTok — or at least a world where the TikTok app can still technically be used, just not downloaded or updated — will look like. Incoming President Donald Trump has said he would try to reverse the ban, though he has limited options to do so

The government’s ostensible reasoning for the last five years of attempting to ban TikTok is national security. A large and bipartisan swath of Congress is concerned that because ByteDance is based in China, the Chinese government could access American users’ data and push or suppress certain kinds of content to Americans. While these concerns are not exactly throwaways, they don’t address the more existential question of TikTok’s presence on Americans’ phones (more than 170 million of them!): Is TikTok a force for good? What even is “good” on the internet? Can a social platform ever aspire to be it, much less embody it?

TikTok is inherently different from Instagram, YouTube, Twitter (now X), Facebook, Snapchat, or any of the other social apps begging for our attention. What do we lose if we lose TikTok? I’m not talking so much about the people whose livelihoods are tied up in it — those people will surely lose business and clout, but many of them will or already have pivoted to other platforms. I’m talking more about the things you can’t quantify: the explosion of creativity you’ll see in just a few scrolls spent on TikTok, the bringing together of hundreds of cultures, the ways in which TikTok does and doesn’t act as a democratizing force. Have we been asking the wrong questions about TikTok the whole time? Whether or not you’re being spied on, was the app ever even worth using at all? Here, the cases for and against TikTok.

TikTok is good, actually

When TikTok came on the scene in 2018, the only thing most people knew about it was that it was embarrassing. Having evolved from the platform Musical.ly, which was populated largely by children and young teenagers lip-syncing to sped-up versions of pop hits, TikTok took a few months to shed the stench of cringe content. Slowly, however (and then much more quickly at the onset of the pandemic), more people were charmed by its unique video editing tools, the easy-to-replicate meme formats, and a new, burgeoning form of extremely silly comedy. In the depths of quarantine, TikTok offered an escape, whether it was in the form of scrolling through cutesy cottagecore content or families learning dance moves while stuck at home together. 

The experience of using TikTok sets it apart from its competitors. As addictive as TikTok is, it does not bombard you with constant notifications the way Facebook and Instagram do, and when you spend more than an hour scrolling, TikTok will encourage you to take a break.

Even pre-pandemic, it was clear that TikTok was an extraordinarily powerful communication tool. First, it’s succinct: Until two years ago, all TikTok videos were capped at three minutes (the limit was originally 60 seconds; it’s now 10 minutes). Second, you can go viral even if you don’t have any followers: Videos are served algorithmically to each user based on what they’ve engaged with in the past, and even videos from small accounts can pick up steam on people’s For You pages via a snowball effect. Third, most of the time, you see the person’s face as they’re talking, creating a stronger, more familiar bond than if you’d simply read a tweet or listened to a podcast. Instead of feeling like you’re watching a stranger, when you see a person talking to you for long enough, they start to feel like someone you can trust.

While much of the attention on TikTok’s ability to make strangers feel like friends has focused on how it has hastened the spread of harmful misinformation, it has also encouraged young people to vote, to engage in local politics, and to organize — sometimes against TikTok itself. It has helped some teens embrace their own mediocrity on an internet that nearly always serves them people who are prettier, richer, and more talented than they are. It has inspired people to make fun iced coffee drinks, to pursue careers in arts and entertainment, to romanticize their lives, to feel more positively about their own bodies. It’s been a source of joy for people dying of terminal disease, an outlet for the grieving, a haven for queer and questioning kids, a diary for newly out trans people.  

It has democratized creative industries like music and publishing; its popular dance and meme challenges have the ability to skyrocket little-known artists making beats in their bedrooms to mainstream success stories. Now, the way to get maximum exposure as an artist is by leveraging TikTok’s algorithmic power, which in turn boosts streaming revenue and touring interest. Meanwhile, digital subcultures like BookTok have encouraged more people to read, go to the library, and support authors they love. Emerging writers who have been shut out of traditional publishing have exploded on the app, making the industry more welcoming to outsiders. 

TikTok has also supercharged the creator economy, or the millions of Americans who make money on social media platforms, making content in exchange for brand sponsorships, affiliate links, direct subscription payments, or from creator funds organized by the platforms themselves. Though it’s a lifestyle defined by precarity, an enormous gap between top earners and the average influencer, and deference to algorithms that can change overnight, it’s one that more people, either unable to find the stability of traditional jobs or supplementing them with internet side hustles, are choosing. 

In a 2019 op-ed defending Twitter’s effect on culture, Sarah J. Jackson argues that despite its reputation of being a cesspit, the social app actually made us better people. The same argument can be made for TikTok. “Like all technological tools, Twitter can be exploited for evil and harnessed for good,” she writes. “Just as the printing press was used to publish content that argued fervently for slavery, it was also used by abolitionists to make the case for manumission. Just as radio and television were used to stir up the fervor of McCarthyism, they were also used to undermine it. Twitter has fallen short in many ways. But this decade, it helped ordinary people change our world.” TikTok is, at its best, a champion for ordinary people, for democracy, for debate, for discourse. That doesn’t mean it’s always nice, but it can be. 

TikTok is bad, actually

Or maybe it’s all shitty, and we’re simply too addicted to scrolling through TikTok to notice or care how much it’s harming us. At least 15 children under 13 who tried to participate in its viral “blackout challenge” have died. While pursuing the dream that TikTok dangled in front of them — becoming an overnight superstar — many more have become burnt out, disillusioned, or otherwise hurt. “Dance used to be the most fun thing in my life and now I don’t like it. Social media has robbed me of that,” says TikTok’s biggest breakout star, Charli D’Amelio, in the first season of her reality show. “I don’t know how long anyone expects me to keep going as if nothing is wrong.”

Watch enough TikTok and you’ll start to see an extremely skewed version of the world, one where only the loudest, most extreme version of humanity is the kind worth noticing. On TikTok, it’s easy to get the sense that everyone is either beautiful or hideous, talented or cringe, billionaires or destitute, simply because extremes are what gets the most attention. As an algorithmically driven platform, TikTok rewards its users’ basest instincts. What hits on TikTok is a legible, irresistible hook — or, in other words, the kind of content that smacks you in the face with its obviousness. 

One largely inconsequential example: At several points over the past three years, we’ve been told that millennials are at war with Gen Z. Despite the fact that a handful of viral TikToks hardly count as a “war,” the way TikTok amplifies meaningless controversy through algorithmic power and negativity bias is concerning, not just because young people desperately need solidarity to create a better world for all of us, but because these sorts of mostly made-up trends offer a distorted view of what the world’s actual immediate problems are. A far more consequential example: Accounts like @LibsofTikTok, which cherry-pick content from liberal or queer TikTokers and use them as strawmen for the left for their followers to mock and attack, function as rage-bait fueling the right-wing media. In the same way that “chronically online” discourse on Twitter distracts us with culture war kindling, TikTok makes it even more personal and ad hominem. 

TikTok videos’ brevity only adds to this problem; the short, headline-grabbing content that goes the most viral is largely devoid of context and nuance, seemingly designed to distract and anger us further. Even something as simple as, say, a review of a new skin care product, is often framed in hyperbole — videos don’t travel unless you make it sound like “this is the BEST thing I’ve ever tried,” or its inverse: “All the videos encouraging you to buy this product are LIES!” What’s left is a cycle of buying and selling, loving and hating, embracing wholeheartedly and then forgetting, until you’re surrounded by barely used bottles in your bathroom cabinet and never-worn clothes for a trend that came and went by the time it arrived at your door. 

The lightning speed of these consumer trends has also changed the way Americans buy stuff, from the staggering number of beauty, homeware, or other products that regularly go viral and flame out, to the introduction of TikTok Shop, which has populated users’ feeds with what are essentially infomercials every few scrolls, with regular people acting as salespeople who earn a commission. At any point, there are dozens of microtrends happening at once, though it’s hard to say whether the trends are actually meaningful or whether one or two videos are going viral at once. Consumers then take part in these ever-shifting trends by immediately purchasing an item on TikTok Shop from an ultra-fast fashion brand and then replacing it with a new one when the next microtrend comes along, leading to even more fashion waste

It can feel as though everyone is trying to sell you something on TikTok, not least themselves. The dark side of having the creative industries overturned by millions of aspiring artists on TikTok is that the job of an artist now involves spending half (or more of) your time promoting yourself online

This is to say nothing of the uneasy sensation of actually consuming TikTok, the reason that with every hour you spend on it, the app sends you a little PSA to maybe get off your phone and do something else for a while. Scrolling TikTok is the visual equivalent of a sensory deprivation tank, the adult version of transfixed toddlers staring at an iPad. It is a machine specifically engineered to get you to dissociate. In the span of about 30 seconds, you can watch a funny video of a puppy leaping into the snow, a sexy fan edit of a popular sci-fi franchise that may or may not be AI-generated, a poem about what it means to lose one’s mother, a makeup tutorial in which all the comments are people making fun of the person’s weight, a 22-year-old articulating why he doesn’t think his girlfriend should be allowed to hang out with other men. Unless you were enrolled in some kind of therapy intended to remove you from all groundedness in reality, nobody would argue that consuming in such a fashion is “good” for you. 

TikTok isn’t the problem, actually

Lest it is not clear, I don’t think TikTok should be banned. I think the problems exacerbated by TikTok are the same problems exacerbated by algorithmically powered social media as a whole. The only winners of TikTok being banned would be Meta and Alphabet (i.e., Instagram and YouTube), companies that, while not carrying the political baggage of being based in China, are far more responsible for the sorry state of humanity under attention capitalism than TikTok.

In a fascinating interview with Current Affairs, author of Stolen Focus: Why You Can’t Pay Attention Johann Hari explains how social media distracts us from what’s important by shoving meaningless controversy in our faces. “How can we come together and achieve anything if we can’t listen and are constantly screaming at each other and constantly interacting through mediums designed to make us angry and hateful towards each other?” he asks. It’s not only collective action that social media makes us miss out on, though; Hari argues that when our attention is constantly fractured, you miss out on the less tangible aspects of what makes a full life. “If you can’t focus, you can’t form proper deep friendships and achieve meaningful work,” Hari says. “You can’t have a meaningful life if you don’t experience depth and attention.”

Few people, including Hari, are advocating that social media should be banned altogether. It’s simply not compatible with the idea of a free and open internet, which, unless the US decides to erect its own version of China’s Great Firewall, is the internet Americans live in. That’s not to argue that major social media companies should be allowed to exist the way they have for the past decade and a half, which is to say by doing whatever they want and enticing people to spend as much time as possible on their websites.

Hari uses the example of how mothers in the 1970s rallied together to push back against the lead industry, which for decades had knowingly caused mental and psychological problems in children. “They didn’t say, ‘Let’s ban all cars and gasoline,’” he says, “they said: Let’s ban the leaded gasoline and force the companies to move to a different business model that doesn’t poison our children.”

What would a business model for social media look like that didn’t prioritize time spent on the app? Hari suggests something like a subscription model, making users of social media sites the true customers, as opposed to the advertisers shopping for users’ data. “Suddenly, they’re not asking, ‘How do we hack and invade Nathan?’ Instead, they’re asking, ‘What does Nathan want?’” The other model would be something like the BBC, an independent but partially taxpayer-funded media institution, he says: “Think about the sewers: everyone listening or reading is near a sewer. Before we had sewers, we had sewage in the streets, people got cholera, and it was terrible. We all pay to build the sewers, and own and maintain them together. We might want to own the information pipes together, because we’re getting the equivalent of cholera, but with our attention and our politics.”

Making either of these changes would require an enormous psychic leap, particularly for Americans, whose fealty to the free market runs core to our identity. But Hari urges us to imagine it anyway. “We are not medieval peasants begging at the courts of King Zuckerberg and King Musk for a few little crumbs of attention from their table,” he says. “We are the free citizens of democracies, and we own our own minds. And together, we can take them back if we’re determined to.”

I don’t think that banning TikTok is a step toward democracy. That the Supreme Court is considering upholding the ban for national security reasons, however, reveals that companies are not kings; that they are subject to the rule of law just as we are. It’s possible that if Americans can envision a world in which an entire, hugely powerful social network is kicked out of our country, perhaps more of them can be transformed into a force that works for us rather than against us. Personally, I’d start by taking a hard look at the companies that have been here longer.

Update, January 10, 5:05 pm ET: This story was originally published in March 2023 and has been updated with new information about TikTok’s possible impending ban.

Москва

Подмосковные танцоры стали лауреатами конкурса «Московское время»

Varun Chakaravarthy claims a fifer ahead of India vs England series

Jhanak: Vihaan starts falling in love with Jhanak

This photo from Chargers practice is straight out of a dystopian movie

Fulham And Man City ‘Could Potentially Go For’ Midfielder If Made Available

Ria.city






Read also

Praying in burning street 'was instinct': California fire survivor posts viral video in fiery embers

Jude Law to Play Vladimir Putin in New Movie 'The Wizard of the Kremlin'

VOA Persian: Political prisoners say executions are no cure for leader's 'crumbling rule'

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

News Every Day

Fulham And Man City ‘Could Potentially Go For’ Midfielder If Made Available

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here


News Every Day

Amazon is ‘winding down’ some of its DEI programs



Sports today


Новости тенниса
Анна Калинская

Калинская призналась, что хотела бы поменяться жизнями с Курниковой



Спорт в России и мире
Москва

СПОРТИВНАЯ КОМАНДА УПРАВЛЕНИЯ РОСГВАРДИИ ПО САРАТОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ СТАЛА ПОБЕДИТЕЛЕМ ЧЕМПИОНАТА ПРИВОЛЖСКОГО ОКРУГА РОСГВАРДИИ ПО ЛЫЖНЫМ ГОНКАМ И СЛУЖЕБНОМУ ДВОЕБОРЬЮ



All sports news today





Sports in Russia today

Москва

ЦСКА всухую проиграл «Куньлуню» в матче КХЛ


Новости России

Game News

Открыта предрегистрация на RO Ragnarok: Must Be Cute — через неделю начнётся бета-тест


Russian.city


Українські новини

Ігор Зотько: підтримка України в часи війни


Губернаторы России
Валерий Гергиев

Валерий Гергиев и Мариинский театр выступят в Москве с концертами


Православные Святки: Период праздника без поста до 18 января

В знак крепкой дружбы. В Москву приехали слоны из Мьянмы

Гулжигит Алыкулов перешел в московское «Торпедо»

Не пейте эти помои: эти марки кофе не смейте брать даже по акции


Алексей Воробьев и корги Моцарт вернулись домой после пожаров в Лос-Анджелесе

AI Певица. Создание AI Певицы. AI Певец. AI Артист.

Аросева, Смоктуновский, Мордюкова, Плисецкая. 100-летние юбиляры 2025-го

Страдивари для Башмета. В зале Чайковского прозвучат старые инструменты


Мыскина: младшую дочь Медведева назвали Виктория

Джокович рассказал об отравлении в Австралии в 2022 году

«Я не делала этого последние пять или шесть лет». Елена Рыбакина удивила откровенным признанием

Australian Open. 12 января. Турнир начнут Котов, Зверев, Рууд, Мирра Андреева, Павлюченкова, Потапова, Блинкова, Соболенко



Захар Прилепин является лидером среди русских писателей по опросу ВЦИОМ

Подведение итогов Кубанского казачьего центра "Баско" за 2024г

«Благодаря Вам об этой песне узнали все»: Филипп Киркоров поздравил KAYA в шоу «Звездные танцы»

Подмосковные танцоры стали лауреатами конкурса «Московское время»


Общепит вышел на улицу // Потребители на праздниках активно подкреплялись стритфудом

Песков прокомментировал слова президента Литвы Науседы про Калининград

Народная артистка России Евгения Добровольская умерла на 61 году жизни

«Спартак» разгромил петербургский СКА в гостевом матче КХЛ


Блиновской прекратили взыскание 1,1 миллиарда рублей по налогам

Юные жители Забайкалья впервые посетили уникальный лагерь в Тульской области

Воздушное судно из Москвы 11 января задерживается с прилетом во Владивосток

«Контракты аннулировать, оружие вернуть»: Алиев потребовал прекратить вооружение Армении, назвав Ереван угрозой безопасности Южному Кавказу



Путин в России и мире






Персональные новости Russian.city
Моргенштерн

Моргенштерн* жалится после пьяного выступления в Куршевеле: «Вы попробуйте мои ботиночки на себя примерить»



News Every Day

Jhanak: Vihaan starts falling in love with Jhanak




Friends of Today24

Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости