Add news
March 2010April 2010May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021April 2021May 2021June 2021July 2021August 2021September 2021October 2021November 2021December 2021January 2022February 2022March 2022April 2022May 2022June 2022July 2022August 2022September 2022October 2022November 2022December 2022
123456
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Hannah Arendt’s Vision of Freedom

This essay is part of Public Discourse’s Who’s Who series, which introduces and critically engages with important thinkers who are often referenced in political and cultural debates, but whose ideas might not be widely known or understood. The series previously considered the life and work of Antonio GramsciJacques MaritainMichael Oakeshott, Charles De Koninck, and Harry V. Jaffa and Allan Bloom.

In our polarized age, it is difficult to remember that a generation or two ago leading intellectuals were concerned that political life was moribund. As political scientist Louis Hartz argued in his 1955 book The Liberal Tradition in America, serious political difference here was suppressed by overwhelming majority agreement on the principles of liberty and equality. The bitter debates of the 1930s seemed forgotten by modern Republicans, who made their peace with an expanded role for the federal government, and modern Democrats, who temporarily set aside their ambition to expand the welfare state. Meanwhile, foreign policy exemplified a bipartisan norm (promoting the United Nations on the one hand and opposing Soviet expansionism on the other), which dictated that whatever political disputes divided Americans at home were to stop at the water’s edge.

In this context, the case for reviving political life—the vibrant activity of public debate and choice, exemplified by the ancient polis and especially by Athens—was powerfully articulated by Hannah Arendt, who thereby became one of the key figures in the revival of political theory.

Born in 1906 to a Jewish family in Linden, Germany, Arendt studied with Martin Heidegger at Marburg and Karl Jaspers at Heidelberg, and she was then forced to flee to France and later to the United States to escape Nazi persecution. In France and in New York she was active with Jewish organizations to help refugees from the Nazis in Europe and to document their fate. With the publication of her monumental Origins of Totalitarianism in 1951, her literary reputation was established. She remained a major figure among New York public intellectuals for the rest of her life, publishing books with major presses and articles in influential outlets such as Commonweal, Dissent, The New Yorker, and the New York Review of Books, and lecturing at elite universities, with extended appointments at the University of Chicago and the New School for Social Research.

Political Thinking

Arendt is often referred to as a philosopher, or as a leading voice of the New Left of the 1960s and ’70s. Both descriptions are misleading. In fact, she explicitly eschewed the title of “philosopher” in her Gifford Lectures, and while one can find an occasional word of praise for contemporary student activism in an interview, she adhered to no party line. A strikingly original thinker, she might more profitably be understood as developing a phenomenology of politics: she was attuned to the experience of political life and was unconstrained by fixed categories. She rejected on the one hand the ideological character of twentieth-century political movements, while on the other corrected Heidegger’s exclusion of politics from his philosophy. She declared herself an enemy of thoughtlessness in politics—or what she famously described as “the banality of evil”—and sought instead to promote political thinking.

To understand what she meant by this, we might begin by considering her Origins of Totalitarianism, a richly textured study that is at once historical, sociological, psychological, and political. Writing between 1945 and 1949, Arendt analyzes the phenomenon of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia in the immediate aftermath of the collapse of the former while the latter remained a looming threat. The book offers an analysis of modernity gone horribly wrong, tracing European antisemitism to the complicated process of Jewish assimilation following the Enlightenment, then analyzing imperialism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as it emerged from Western racism, itself built on the collapse of nationalism. According to Arendt, totalitarianism arises in the wake of the First World War and its creation of stateless populations, as well as classless mass societies of powerless, politically indifferent, and isolated individuals who do not share common interests or goals. It is a complex phenomenon involving propaganda (particularly the employment of ostensibly scientific language), ideology, elites and sympathizers, secret police, a despotic leader, and terror as a means of control. The thread that runs through her whole analysis is the loss of political engagement, from the satisfaction of the bourgeoisie with their private lives to the evisceration of all privacy and all politics in the totalitarian state.

 

Political Action

While Origins is deeply immersed in historical fact, Arendt’s Walgreen Lectures, published in 1958 as The Human Condition, are more explicitly theoretical, ranging adeptly across the whole tradition of political philosophy. She takes issue with the distinction between the active life and the contemplative life, the vita activa and the vita contemplativa. In particular, she objects both to the classical philosophical view that contemplation is superior to action and to the modern view that favors active life but fails to attend to “distinctions and articulations.” Arendt divides the vita activa into labor, work, and action: the first is concerned with natural necessity and material consumption, the second with art and the building of a human world, the third with politics. She faults modern thought, mainstream and Marxist, for its focus on labor and its attempt through technology to emancipate man from labor without considering what he was emancipated for. The point of work is to build a world for man to live in, a product of art but more importantly an arena for action. Like Machiavelli, whom she cites often and favorably, she wants to restore the polis—the political life its citizens lived—not because the city exists by nature but because political action properly understood shows man at his most noble.

In Arendt’s view, political action happens in relation to others; it involves deliberation and choice, but also competition and courage. It involves common effort—political power arises from joint action, not command—but it also depends on individuals’ preserving their integrity, not losing themselves in a mass or even in a political party. Since the political arena is flexible and fluid, political actors gain honor and remembrance by engaging with changing circumstances and creating something new, not by confining themselves within the limits of custom or by reiterating old laws. Politics shows itself most intensely in revolution and in founding, and those who engage politically in these moments know that as they act together to initiate something genuinely original, they are fully exercising their human faculties.

 

Political Freedom

This is political freedom, according to Arendt, and it seems to be the greatest good. As she observed in her next book in 1963, On Revolution, the chief example of men who understood this were those who made the American Revolution, who sought to institute a novus ordo seclorum and succeeded gloriously—though she concluded that “it was the Constitution itself, this greatest achievement of the American people, which eventually cheated them of their proudest possession,” presumably because it channeled and limited their political energies into highly structured institutions. Still, political freedom is not only for those who are great, even if it is the key to human greatness; it can be found wherever human beings engage in common action to determine their future together.

For Arendt, the modern bureaucratic state and the mass society whose material life it administers had forgotten the value of political freedom. In Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, she concludes that Adolf Eichmann, the defendant in a dramatic trial in Israel and a high-ranking Nazi functionary who had escaped to Latin America, showed no extraordinary malice. Instead, he was a recognizable modern type whose identity was constituted by his place in the state bureaucracy and whose sense of duty was defined entirely by success in efficiently fulfilling his bureaucratic tasks. In this sense, political freedom can be seen as the opposite of bureaucratic service: it is responsible, not anonymous; inventive, not compliant; thoughtful, not thoughtless—that is, political freedom is aware of the larger circumstances and choices, and willing to make decisions for which one will be held accountable, earning praise or blame. Arendt’s account of the Holocaust was also condemned for her sharp and unforgiving remarks about the leaders of Jewish ghettoes who cooperated with Nazi officials in sending Jews to the camps. As she saw it, clientelism, like bureaucracy, is a form of corruption, in contrast with the spark of political freedom evident in the Warsaw uprising.

For Arendt, the life of the public intellectual is a political life, particularly in modern circumstances. Although she looks back to the ancient polis, she hardly thinks the exercise of political freedom is restricted to orators in an assembly or hoplites in the field. The independent spirit Arendt showed in her writings—her reluctance to attach herself to a political or intellectual movement, indeed the relish she seemed to take in arguing against the favored opinions of her admirers—exemplified precisely the sort of political action she praised.

She did not disparage philosophy; indeed, in her efforts to reconstruct a political theory from Immanuel Kant’s Third Critique, she was mindful of his appeal to “public reason,” which she agreed was philosophy’s characteristic mode of expression. One might wonder whether her work adequately refutes the classical case for the contemplative life and whether her emphasis on political novelty underestimates the case for constitutionalism. Relatedly, one might ask whether together contemplation and constitutionalism indicate the limits of political freedom—the first by showing politics is not the greatest good, the second by limiting the political realm to leave room for what is higher than politics. Still, to have helped restore the nobility of politics in the face of the modern totalitarian state is an achievement worth remembering and worth the effort to understand.









Read also

Handball: Champions Kano battle Niger for final spot

Nassau man arrested for allegedly raping a minor

With 6 straight losses, Bears get breather with bye week


News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

News Every Day

Five ways struggling families can get free cash to help pay for food this Christmas

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here


News Every Day

The Darkest Secret and Tragedy of Edwin Valero



Sports today


Новости тенниса
ATP

Александр Бублик попал в подборку игроков, впервые выигравших титул ATP В 2022 году



Спорт в России и мире
Москва

Евгения Медведева отметила Всемирный день катания на коньках на легендарном катке ВДНХ


Загрузка...

All sports news today




Загрузка...

Sports in Russia today

Москва

Саблисты из Подмосковья завоевали три медали на международных соревнованиях


Новости России

Game News

Bioware celebrates Dragon Age Day with a new Dreadwolf teaser


Russian.city


Киев

Сенатор Цеков рассказал об источнике обогащения президента Зеленского


Губернаторы России
WSJ

WSJ: Apple ускорила вывод части производства из Китая


Источник «360» сообщил о пожаре на рынке по Сигнальному проезду в Москве

Итоги проекта "Дизайн-Перспектива 2022"

Юрист: Мошенники стали присылать жертвам ложные заявления о взятии кредита

В Москве прошел социальный форум «Совместная работа региональных отделений Союза пенсионеров России и органов власти по сохранению здоровья пожилых людей»


Юрий Шевчук: После тяжелых времен случится «взрыв». В искусстве

Оркестр штаба Уральского округа Росгвардии дал большой концерт на сцене Свердловской государственной филармонии.

«Терапия» от Мацуева: Моцарт, Сен-Санс, Шостакович

Певица Аллегрова довела зрителей до слез песней про СВО


Первая ракетка Казахстана не изменил положения в топ-40 рейтинга ATP

Генеральный директор ТГК-14 Николаенко покинул свой пост - СМИ

«Взрослый душнила»: Настя Ивлеева отправила домой Алексея Смирнова после стычки с соперником

Племянница тунеядца из «Шурика» Алексея Смирнова рассказала, как сложилась его личная жизнь



Евгения Медведева отметила Всемирный день катания на коньках на легендарном катке ВДНХ

В Москве прошел социальный форум «Совместная работа региональных отделений Союза пенсионеров России и органов власти по сохранению здоровья пожилых людей».

Алиев готовится к новому Геноциду армян в Арцахе: предупреждение Института Лемкина

Разве не Азербайджан вместе с Турцией и Пакистаном провел учения против Армении? – иранское информационное агентство ИРНА


Британский журналист опроверг переход Роналду в «Аль-Наср»

Приглашаем стать героями и участниками съемки телевизионного Новогоднего проекта!

Актер Виталий Андреев назвал лучший подарок для девушки на Новый год

Юлия Путинцева высказалась о победе над Анастасией Потаповой на турнире "Трофеи Северной Пальмиры"


Россия отрицает возможность вывода ЗАЭС из-под своего контроля

«Стратегия по восстановлению статуса империи». Как реагируют на «газовый союз» Путина Узбекистан и Казахстан?

Юрист: Мошенники стали присылать жертвам ложные заявления о взятии кредита

Белый дом назвал ожидаемой реакцию России на введение ценового предела на нефть



Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city

Сергей Брановицкий

Дизайн обложки книги! Какой он должен быть?



News Every Day

Five ways struggling families can get free cash to help pay for food this Christmas




Friends of Today24


Загрузка...
Музыкальные новости

Персональные новости
Moscow.media