Мобильный 1 Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021April 2021May 2021June 2021July 2021August 2021September 2021October 2021November 2021December 2021January 2022February 2022March 2022April 2022May 2022
News Every Day |

NJ Appeals Court: Lower Court Mixed Up 4th And 5th Amendment And Either Way, Phone Passcodes Can Be Compelled

More case law on compelled passcode production and the Fifth Amendment has been generated by a New Jersey appeals court. Unfortunately, it doesn’t do anything to strengthen Fifth Amendment protections against compelled production.

And that’s largely because this court can’t. The state’s Supreme Court handed down a ruling in August 2020 that limited the “foregone conclusion” the government needed to reach before securing a court order demanding passcode production was limited to the device and the existence of a passcode, rather than offering supporting arguments about the presumed existence of criminal evidence on the device.

That case dealt with a crooked cop whose phones were seized during an investigation. After discussing some (still unaddressed) concerns about the Fifth Amendment’s inconsistent application in other cases that may protect people using passwords more than people using biometric features to unlock phones, the court said that, in this case, law enforcement knew what it needed to know to surmount the “foregone conclusion” barrier.

The State’s demonstration of the passcodes’ existence, Andrews’s previous possession and operation of the cellphones, and the passcodes’ self-authenticating nature render the issue here one of surrender, not testimony, and the foregone conclusion exception to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination thus applies. Therefore, the Fifth Amendment does not protect Andrews from compelled disclosure of the passcodes to his cellphones.

It’s this case that’s specifically cited in this appeals court decision [PDF]. The lower court refused to grant the government’s motion to compel, citing its inability to prove the locked iPhone seized belonged to the suspect. It also said the search of the phone (which hasn’t occurred yet) raised additional Fourth Amendment concerns.

Here’s how everything started:

Det. Pancza and members of the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force executed the three warrants at 6:00 a.m. on July 16, 2021, at defendant’s residence. Defendant was located in his locked bedroom. He was the only occupant of the room, and he refused to open the door. Ultimately, the officers forced entry into defendant’s bedroom.

During their search of defendant’s bedroom, officers located three electronic devices: a Samsung cell phone, an Asus laptop, and an Apple iPhone. The iPhone was found in a pull string bag hanging on the back of a computer chair.

In accordance with the search warrant, Detective Brian Migliorisi attempted to access the iPhone 7, but he was prevented from doing so because the iPhone was passcode protected. The only information Det. Migliorisi could retrieve from the iPhone was its association with the same iCloud email account from the cyber tips, the one containing defendant’s last name and first initial. Defendant was charged with third-degree endangering the welfare of children, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(b)(5)(b)(iii).

The lower court did not find these circumstances added up to proof of the defendant’s ownership of the iPhone.

The court denied the motion, concluding the State failed to establish defendant’s ownership of the iPhone and knowledge of the passcode. The court found that officers locating the iPhone in “a backpack” in “a bedroom” was insufficient to prove defendant’s ownership. The court also found “that the phone immediately being in the vicinity of the defendant at the time of the search” did not “conclusively demonstrate that . . . defendant own[ed] the phone.”

The appeals court disagrees. First, it points to the August 2020 Andrews decision, which limited the Fifth Amendment discussion to the government proving a passcode exists, the defendant “operates or controls” the device in question, and that entry of the passcode would allow investigators to access the device’s contents. From what it sees here, the government has everything it needs to utilize the “foregone conclusion” exception.

Further, it says the Fourth Amendment concerns about the proposed search have no bearing on this discussion because the search hasn’t been performed and the defendant never challenged the warrants utilized in this case. If the search is indeed determined to be overbroad, the defendant can challenge it then. But because no challenge to the probable cause basis was raised by the suspect, the lower court was wrong to bring Fourth Amendment analysis into a discussion dealing solely with compelled production.

The only standard being applied to compelled production was easily met here, the appeals court says.

The motion court found defendant was in the “vicinity” of the phone and concluded that this was insufficient to prove defendant’s ownership or operation of it. We disagree, as the court overlooked credible evidence in the record when making its findings. At the time of the search the phone was in defendant’s locked bedroom; he was the sole occupant and refused to let the police in. Significantly, the email address associated with the phone’s iCloud account incorporates defendant’s last name and first initial. These probative facts, which suggest that defendant owned and operated the iPhone, were omitted from the motion court’s analysis.

Any further appeal efforts within the state will be foreclosed by the state Supreme Court’s decision. To appeal this determination, the defendant will have to look to the top court in the land. That remains an option because this is a discussion about federal constitutional rights rather than limited to the protections granted by New Jersey’s constitution. But odds are slim this will be examined by the US Supreme Court. The Andrews case that set state precedent has already had its appeal effort rejected by SCOTUS. For the time being, it will remain pretty easy for New Jersey law enforcement to bypass the Fifth Amendment.









Read also

A Utah hunting guide is facing felony charges for 'illegally baiting' a bear for Donald Trump Jr.

Sunderland beat Wycombe to seal Championship return

Steph Curry will only wear shoes that are loud and pass 'the squeak test'


Прямой эфир РБК. Главные новости России и мира сегодня (Прямой эфир ежедневно)

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro

News Every Day

High school scoreboard: NCS baseball, softball playoffs, CIF NorCal volleyball regionals

Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here


News Every Day

The Horse & Hound Podcast 103: Laura Collett on winning Badminton | Royal Windsor review | Life as a vet | News round-up



Sports today


Новости тенниса
Уимблдон

Уимблдон без русских: за кого россияне теперь болеют на турнире



Спорт в России и мире
Москва

Российский боксер Бивол поддержит Кузьмина в поединке против Ларти в боксерском вечере "Короли Нокаутов-9"


Загрузка...

All sports news today




Загрузка...

Sports in Russia today

Москва

Российский боксер Бивол поддержит Кузьмина в поединке против Ларти в боксерском вечере "Короли Нокаутов-9"


Новости России

Game News

11 games with impressively tiny install sizes in 2022


Russian.city


Блоги

Фанаты «Зенита» перед выездом к «Спартаку» посетили Ржевский мемориал Советскому солдату


Губернаторы России
Внуково

Загрутдинов: Физкультурно-оздоровительный комплекс с двумя бассейнами построят в районе Внуково


Отбеливание зубов – способ сделать улыбку белоснежной

EMSC: у побережья Филиппин произошло землетрясение магнитудой 5,8 балла

Вера Алентова объяснила, почему не любят москвичей

Как за месяц предотвратили эпидемию черной оспы в Москве в 1960 году


Отбирают имущество: потерявшая бизнес Королева погрязла в судах

Документальный фильм о Басте выйдет в Сети 24 мая

От дачи показаний отказался: дело Юрия Шевчука о дискредитации ВС РФ изучат в суде Петербурга

Певица Рита Дакота показала нос после ринопластики


Заслуженный тренер РФ Камельзон прокомментировал решение ATP и WTA по Уимблдону

Чесноков: лишение Уимблдона рейтинговых очков ударит по теннисистам

Андрей Ольховский: Решение ATP и WTA по поводу Уимблдона меня удивило в положительном смысле

ITF поддержала решение не начислять очки теннисистам на Уимблдоне



В ЗАО прошел окружной этап соревнований на лучшее нештатное формирование

Первые утята появились на прудах Битцевского леса

Как за месяц предотвратили эпидемию черной оспы в Москве в 1960 году

Тумбы под телевизор в современном интерьере


Что с сайтом 123ru.net (правда)

Поликанов: «Главное поле битвы – это умы людей»

Мелкадзе: «Сочи» составить конкуренцию «Зениту» в сезоне-2022/23

Проведут турнир памяти чемпиона мира Макса Эйве


В Подмосковье на 9-летнего мальчика упали футбольные ворота

«Химки» и «Спартак» назвали составы на заключительный матч сезона в РПЛ

В Долгопрудном 4 человека насмерть отравились угарным газом из-за самовольно переделанного дымохода

«Спартак» потерпел поражение от «Химок» в матче РПЛ



Путин в России и мире







Персональные новости
Russian.city

Олег Митяев

Фестиваль бардовской песни с Народным артистом России Олегом Митяевым пройдёт в Ковдоре



News Every Day

Andrew Nicholson: ‘Riders must use their gears when riding cross-country’




Friends of Today24


Загрузка...
Музыкальные новости
"Воскресенье " Олег Митяев



Персональные новости
Близкий друг Путина миллиардер Пугачев. Вся правда о Путине, его семье и деньгах. В гостях у Гордона (2021)

Навальный об уволенном за пост священнике (2021)

Slava Marlow – суперуспех и депрессия в 21 год / вДудь (2021)

Обнаглевшие дети путинской элиты (2021)

Дайте собакам мяса (новый звук) -Владимир Высоцкий

Группа "Рождество" - песня "Так хочется жить!" (Видео с концерта в Киеве группы "РОЖДЕСТВО" в 2011 году в Доме офицеров)

Adriano Celentano Любимая песня Челентано (высочайшая энергетика) talentTV


Moscow.media