Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021
News Every Day |

Deforestation actually COOLS parts of the US, says bombshell new report from NASA

Deforestation actually COOLS parts of the US, says bombshell new report from NASA

Startling new NASA-funded research indicates that, contrary to popular wisdom, deforestation in the US does not always cause planetary warming and may, in fact, cool the climate, depending on the area involved.

The bombshell research was led by Christopher A. Williams, an environmental scientist and professor in Clark University’s Graduate School of Geography. 

The peer-reviewed study will likely have far-reaching implications for policy and land management efforts across the US and beyond. 

Using state-of-the-art satellite remote sensing, as opposed to computer models as was the case in many previous studies, Williams and his team examined what uses various deforested areas were repurposed for (urban, agricultural, grassland etc.) and quantified how much biomass carbon was released into the atmosphere as a result.  

They then calculated how much additional sunlight would be reflected back out into space as a result, depending on the particular change in landscape. 

Also on
Illustration: © Pexels
‘Pollution cools the planet’: Pandemic-induced lockdowns RAISED global temperatures in 2020

The research indicates that the solution to planetary warming caused by climate change may not be as straightforward as just planting more trees.

Forests absorb carbon dioxide, store it in wood and soil and alleviate the greenhouse gas burden on the atmosphere. 

However, forests also tend to be quite dark, and absorb and retain more sunlight, and by extension heat, in a process called the “albedo effect”.

“We found that in some parts of the country like the Intermountain West, more forest actually leads to a hotter planet when we consider the full climate impacts from both carbon and albedo effects,” said Professor Williams. 

Striking a balance between this effect and forests’ carbon capture and storage capabilities is important to forming coherent and effective public environmental policy in the US and beyond. 

For one quarter of the US, forest loss contributed to a net cooling effect, as the previous tree density created an albedo effect which outweighed the trees’ carbon absorption. 

Also on
© NASA Earth Observatory
World is literally a greener place than it was 20 years ago, according to NASA data

However, not all forests are alike, and the researchers also found contrasting readings in areas east of the Mississippi River and along the Pacific Coast, where forest loss produced a net planetary warming effect. 

In fact, the geographical locations of forests will play a huge role in climate change mitigation efforts, especially amid such an overwhelming groundswell of public and governmental support for reforestation initiatives. 

“If we fail to consider both the carbon and the albedo effects, large-scale tree-planting initiatives, such as Canada’s 2Billion Trees Initiative and the Nature Conservancy’s Plant a Billion Trees campaign, could end up placing trees in locations that are counterproductive for cooling the climate system,” said Professor Williams.

In other words, location matters hugely in the deployment of new forests. 

Roughly one million acres (4,000 square kilometers) of forest are lost across the lower 48 states of the US each year owing to urbanization. Over a 15-year timescale, the cumulative heating effect of this forest loss is the equivalent to 17 percent of a year’s fossil fuel emissions in the US.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Read also

The Radfords share chaotic back-to-school life including a ‘horrendous’ shoe bill and strictly NO hand-me-downs

Melania Trump, 50, and Donald ‘both had secret Covid vaccines before leaving White House’

Police detain former Barcelona officials in search operation

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here
News Every Day

Draymond Green out after second quarter ankle sprain