Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021
123456789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Lawyers demand end to ban on Isa from hearing cases of PM

0
Lawyers demand end to ban on Isa from hearing cases of PM

ISLAMABAD: Members of the legal fraternity from Balochistan on Friday expressed concern over the Feb 11 Supreme Court order, which banned Justice Qazi Faez Isa from hearing any case against Prime Minister Imran Khan, and said no curb should be placed on the constitutional rights of a superior court judge and demanded that the restriction be removed at once.

Senior member of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) Munir Kakar and vice chairman of the Balochistan Bar Council (BBC) Qasim Ali Gajaizi and the chairman of the executive committee (BBC) in a statement regretted that such a directive was against legal and constitutional principles, especially when a 10-judge Supreme Court bench had already quashed the presidential reference filed against Justice Isa — a reference which they said was based on malice.

On Feb 11, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed had issued an order banning Justice Isa from hearing cases involving Prime Minister Imran Khan, stating that he (Justice Isa) had already filed a petition against the prime minister in his personal capacity against the proposed plan to distribute Rs500 million development fund each among PTI lawmakers.

PBC, BBC leaders term SC order against principles

The Supreme Court order said that in order to uphold the principle of impartiality, Justice Isa should not hear cases involving the prime minister. A statement issued on behalf of the prime minister had, however, termed media reports about development funds incorrect.

The order had recalled how Justice Isa during the hearing placed on record photocopies of certain documents received by him from some anonymous source through a WhatsApp message, the copies of which were also handed over to other members of the bench as well as Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Khalid Jawed Khan.

Though Justice Isa had observed that he was unsure if the documents were genuine, the AGP had submitted that since the authenticity of the documents was questionable, the same may not be taken on record but in any event Justice Isa would become a complainant in the matter and in that capacity it would not be appropriate for the judge to hear the matter.

The SC chief justice, therefore, observed that in these circumstances it would not be proper for Justice Isa to hear the case.

Reacting to the Supreme Court or­­der, former vice chairman of the PBC Abid Saqi cited the 1989 judgement of the Sup­reme Court in which it was held that one set of judges of a constituted bench could not issue a directive to the other bench or any of the judges of the bench, not to hear a matter.

While dealing with the issue of bias, former judge Abdul Kadir Shaikh, a member of the then 12-judge Supreme Court bench, had held that one judge of a division bench could not direct the other judge or judges of the bench not to hear the case on the ground that he had a bias or an interest in the case or for that matter on any other ground, whatsoever.

Though it was a minority view, it still had a precedence value and, therefore, has a binding effect, he said, recalling that the judgement was titled Federation of Pakistan versus Muhammad Akram Sheikh.

The bench consisted of former Chief Justice Muhammad Haleem, judges Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Nasim Hasan Shah, Abdul Kadir Shaikh, Shafiur Rahman, Javid Iqbal, Ghulam Mujaddid, Saad Saood Jan Usman Ali Shah, Ali Hussain Qazilbash and Naimuddin.

Then during the hearing of the review petition, a question was raised through an application by the federal government stating that some of the judges who decided a case in the earlier round of litigation be declared as judges in their own cause having a pecuniary interest.

But Justice Sheikh, while referring to the allegation of bias, had held that it was for the judges concerned and not the rest of the judges of the bench to decide in their judicious sagacity and wisdom whether they may participate in the proceedings in question or not.

Meanwhile, Munir Kakar said in the statement that after quashing the presidential reference against Justice Isa, no dispute existed between the government and the judge.

He said the SC order was reminiscent of the 1990s era when one bench of the superior court used to issue orders against other benches, adding that the legal fraternity would never compromise on their efforts to ensure independence of the judiciary.

They demanded that the curb placed on Justice Isa be removed immediately.

Published in Dawn, February 13th, 2021





Read also

GameStop spikes 14% after announcing board member Ryan Cohen will lead its transition to e-commerce

Expert reveals leading causes of blindness in Nigeria

Oprah interview ‘like Diana getting revenge on royal family from beyond grave’




News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro



Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here
News Every Day

Missing ‘fraudster’ Melissa Caddick may have cut off her own foot to escape police, top cop says