Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021February 2021March 2021
News Every Day |

Report: 2018 Peace Deal Was Not a Fix for South Sudan

Report: 2018 Peace Deal Was Not a Fix for South Sudan

A new International Crisis Group (ICG) report is urging South Sudan’s leaders to consider a political model that uses consensus and inclusion to decide the country’s future.

Alan Boswell, a South Sudan researcher and author of the ICG report, said that although the initial 2018 peace deal signed by the country’s warring parties halted the country’s civil war, it was not a long-term fix for South Sudan’s deeper problems.

Boswell said he didn't expect the agreement to last, because he believed the ruling elites would turn against each other.

Civil war threat remains

“We don’t think South Sudan’s problems are going to be resolved by the transitional period that leads to elections, probably between the two different camps, and in which one side wins power and the other side loses power. We think that a 'winner-take-all' solution to South Sudan’s problems is not a very good one for South Sudan,” Boswell told VOA’s South Sudan in Focus via WhatsApp.

In the 33-page report released Wednesday, Boswell wrote, “Smaller conflicts are still ablaze and the threat of return to full-blown civil war remains.”

The report noted that South Sudan is a diverse country that lacks basic institutions. It concluded that the country was so fragile that it might not be possible to peacefully govern without broadly accommodating its diverse groups, and it expressed doubt that the elections scheduled for 2022 could be held without the country descending into more violence.

Women march carrying placards with messages demanding peace and their rights, on the streets of South Sudan's capital, Juba on…
FILE - Women march carrying placards with messages demanding peace and their rights, on the streets of South Sudan's capital, Juba, July 13, 2018.

The report suggested a pre-election deal to guarantee broader power-sharing and a political settlement that decentralizes government.

“The real risk of course is that you have two former warring parties on other sides running against each other in elections, and the result of those elections is one of those sides feeling they have lost and then seeking to return to war in order to get back in government,” Boswell told VOA. “We think that will obviously be a terrible outcome and we also think that it is avoidable, and that’s why we encourage not only increased power-sharing before the vote but also regional leaders to encourage dialogue between the main principals if they do run against each other in the upcoming elections.”

Find what works

ICG called South Sudan’s political system broken.

“We think it is important for the South Sudanese to revisit these political systems so that they come up with a model that works for itself, a model in which South Sudan is able to rule its people by consensus rather than by exclusion, and we think that is a process that can be done through a national conference at some point in the future,” said Boswell.

FILE - In this Jan. 5, 2014, file photo, South Sudanese Information Minister Michael Makuei attends a press conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
FILE - In this Jan. 5, 2014, photo, South Sudanese Information Minister Michael Makuei attends a press conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Government spokesperson Michael Makuei insisted countries like the United States also have broken political systems.

Makuei told South Sudan in Focus it wasn't fair for organizations like the ICG to write about South Sudan because, in his opinion, they do not adequately understand it.

"South Sudan is a democratic state ... and as long as we are a democratic state, then there ought to be divergent political opinions,” said Makuei. “And if there are divergent political opinions, that does not necessarily mean that it will collapse or anything will happen to it.”

Puok Both Baluang, spokesman for South Sudan’s main opposition party, said that South Sudan once had a broken political system, but that the parties were now working hard to reform the country’s “tainted image” and ensure lasting peace in the country.

"We say the country indeed was in a broken system of governance; it’s not in terms of the political aspect only, but through this peace agreement we are hoping that we can transform the country according to the articles and the provisions in the revitalized agreement,” Baluang told South Sudan in Focus.

Accent on unity

Boswell said it was important for the country’s leaders to push for unity rather than division and to ensure that citizens are ruled by people they choose as their leaders, not by leaders that are imposed on them.

He also encouraged the transitional government to commit strongly to the constitutional review process, saying it would likely resolve most of the country’s problems.

The ICG report noted that just two years after the country’s inception in July 2011, South Sudan “collapsed at the center, as the rival camps loyal to President Salva Kiir and Vice President Riek Machar turned against each other in bloody combat that shattered the ruling party.”

ICG is an independent organization whose mission is to “prevent wars and shape policies that will build a more peaceful world,” according to its website.


Read also

To the editor: Merrin plays deadly games

Horns Ends Up on Top in Norman as OU Loses 4th Straight 69-65

Kate Garraway slams ‘unnecessary fear’ as she’s targeted by sick scammers who claim she’s ‘at risk of new Covid variant’

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here
News Every Day

Hearn: Canelo was 30% what he is now against Mayweather, talks Top Rank feud