Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020November 2020December 2020January 2021
News Every Day |

'Trump passes the test' for being prosecuted for inciting the Capitol riot: ex-Justice Department officials

According to a commentary written for Politico by two former senior Justice Department officials, Donald Trump likely would not be able to seek refuge by asserting his 1st Amendment right to free speech should he be indicted for inciting the mob to storm the U.S. Capitol last week that led to five deaths.

With the FBI and Justice Department officials scouring the country and arresting participants in the assault that shocked the world, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and David Williams, a former inspector general for multiple agencies, write that the Supreme Court has already set the legal threshold for prosecution when it comes to inciting a riot -- and that the president went well beyond it.

"The federal criminal code (18 USC 373) makes it a crime to solicit, command, induce or 'endeavor to persuade' another person to commit a felony that includes the threat or use of physical force. Simply put, it is a crime to persuade another person, or a mob of several thousand, to commit a violent felony," they wrote before providing what would likely be Exhibit A in the trial of Donald Trump-- his actual words.

"In mid-December, Trump tweeted, 'Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!' At the Save America rally, Trump exhorted his supporters to 'stop the steal,' shortly before they launched their attack. He commanded the crowd, 'Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong.' He made it clear: 'If they do the wrong thing, we should never, ever forget that they did. Never forget.' Near the end of his address, Trump went on to remind his supporters, 'The radical left knows exactly what they were doing. They are ruthless and it's time that somebody did something about it,'" they reported.

Add to that, Trump on Wednesday told the crowd before they attacked the Capitol, "So we are going to—we are going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue, I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we are going to the Capitol, and we are going to try and give—the Democrats are hopeless, they are never voting for anything, not even one vote but we are going to try—give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help, we're try—going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country. So let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue."

Those words could come back to haunt the president if the U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. decides to prosecute the president after he leaves office.

As the two officials wrote, "As a person with good lawyers and experience being investigated, Trump would undoubtedly claim these comments were nothing more than First-Amendment-protected political speech if he were charged with encouraging the mob to commit seditious conspiracy. But that might not help. In 1969, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Brandenberg v Ohio, found that the government can punish inflammatory speech when it is 'directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.'"

Saying Trump has passed the "test," they wrote that the president's words made clear "he brought the members of the mob to D.C. He convened them at a rally; he and others inflamed the audience with lies about a stolen election and their duty to save the country from the certification that was underway at that moment. He pointed them at the Capitol and persuaded them to "do something about it." He offered to go with them. He had every reason to believe his rhetoric would lead to violence in the same way it did at his rally on December 12."

The authors go on to state that the president could also face charges over the death of Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick who was reportedly bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher during the riot that the president inspired.

You can read more here.

Read also

UNN secures Nigeria spot on scholarly citations as SA, Egypt lead

Oreanna Myers’ husband suffered ‘truly dark time’ after she shot five kids in head and burned bodies in house fire

How creating wildlife crossings can help reindeer, bears – and even crabs

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here