Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020October 2020
News Every Day |

Judge lets DOJ proceed with lawsuit over Bolton's anti-Trump tell-all

What happened: The Trump administration won an early round in its court showdown Thursday with John Bolton as a federal judge rejected the former national security adviser’s bid to throw out a lawsuit seeking to seize the proceeds from Bolton’s tell-all memoir.

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth largely upheld the government’s interpretation of nondisclosure agreements Bolton signed in exchange for access to both classified information and a more closely held category of secrets known as sensitive compartmented information (SCI).

The background: Bolton has denied that his book, “The Room Where It Happened,” contains the kind of intelligence sources and methods that are treated as SCI. But Lamberth said Bolton was obliged to submit for prepublication review any book that even discussed topics related to SCI, which typically involves intelligence sources and methods.

Bolton said a broad interpretation of the SCI agreement would force him to submit even a cookbook for advance approval, but the judge rejected that argument out of hand.

“While the National Security Advisor's role may require many of his writings to be submitted for prepublication review, the nexuses apply only to information related to intelligence sources and methods,” wrote Lamberth, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan. “Bolton may freely publish a cookbook, unless he intends to edit a set of recipes from CIA operatives and sources.”

In his 27-page ruling, Lamberth also said it did not matter legally whether the government designated the information as SCI before or after Bolton disclosed it. The initial suit the Justice Department filed over the book in May claimed only that it contained classified information, but a version filed a few days later added the allegation that it contained SCI.

The former Trump White House official got some backing for his position last month when a lawyer for Ellen Knight, the official who handled the initial phase of the prepublication review of Bolton’s book, submitted a detailed letter claiming that officials close to Trump undertook a secretive, second review of the manuscript after she had already completed a painstaking initial review to remove potentially classified topics from the book.

What’s next: Bolton’s lawyers have asked the court to allow them to take discovery and demand documents from the White House and others in a bid to show that the claims about classified information in the book are just pretexts for an attempt by Trump to suppress a book that paints a deeply unflattering portrait of him.

Lamberth has yet to rule on Bolton’s motion for discovery or the related government motion for judgment in their favor. If the government prevails in the case, it could be entitled to any advance Bolton received as well as any royalties he may get from the book in the future.

So far in the case, Lamberth has taken a dim view of Bolton’s actions, suggesting he was reckless by failing to stick with the prepublication review process until he got formal notification it was OK to proceed with the book. Bolton’s lawyer has said he thought he had confirmation from Knight that there was nothing classified in the book.

Lamberth suggested in an earlier ruling that Bolton could face criminal prosecution over his actions. No charges have been filed, but POLITICO reported last month that a criminal probe appears to be underway, with at least one grand jury subpoena issued to Bolton's publisher.

Read also

WATCH: Colorful fireball blazes across Puerto Rican skies as Google Loon project sparks hundreds of UFO reports

The Militia That Fox News Built

Facebook's much-hyped oversight board that can overrule even CEO Mark Zuckerberg likely won't make any decisions until after Election Day

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here