Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020September 2020
News Every Day |

Full Fight: Should Fury have lost his lineal championship to Wallin?

Tyson Fury v Otto Wallin Gene Blevins/Getty Images

Tyson Fury was a huge favorite against Otto Wallin, but by the rules should he have lost his LINEAL!!!!! title?

Just about a year ago, in Sept. 2019, Tyson Fury entered as a massive favorite against Otto Wallin in Las Vegas, in a fight that headlined on ESPN+.

But the fight wound up controversial for more than just how the scores turned out. By judges’ tallies, Fury retained his LINEAL!!!!!! heavyweight championship on scores of 116-112, 117-111, and 118-110, pretty comfortable all told. (For what it’s worth, BLH had it 114-114 (my card) and 116-112 for Fury.)

Wallin, however, had opened up a vicious gash on Fury in the third round, and the cut in question was caused by a legal punch. Yes, Wallin worsened it with some questionable tactics, including a flat-out blatant foul where he raked the laces of his glove against Fury’s cut, but the cause of the cut was a legal punch. And Fury bled and bled and bled — to the point that, realistically, most fights would have been stopped, and Wallin awarded the W.

Why wasn’t this one?

Because Fury was the A-side — by a lot. Because Fury’s rematch with Deontay Wilder, a big money fight, was on the line. Because ESPN and Top Rank have put a lot of money into Tyson Fury, and no cut was going to be the reason he was upset by the largely unknown Swede.

That, of course, is just my opinion. But what do you think? Should Fury have been stopped in that fight? Should Wallin have pulled one of the great upsets or recent memory and been awarded the win? Or was referee Tony Weeks totally right to let Fury press on — as Tyson wanted to, mind you — given the level of fight we’re talking about here?

Read also

Wolff not ruling out Hamilton-Red Bull deal

Hundreds gather to ‘say her name’ at Daley Center rally for Breonna Taylor

FG set to address flooding as HYPPADEC takes off soon

News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here