Add news
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010June 2010July 2010
August 2010
September 2010October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 2011January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 2012December 2012January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 2013August 2013September 2013October 2013November 2013December 2013January 2014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 2014January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 2015January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 2017June 2017July 2017August 2017September 2017October 2017November 2017December 2017January 2018February 2018March 2018April 2018May 2018June 2018July 2018August 2018September 2018October 2018November 2018December 2018January 2019February 2019March 2019April 2019May 2019June 2019July 2019August 2019September 2019October 2019November 2019December 2019January 2020February 2020March 2020April 2020May 2020June 2020July 2020August 2020
12345678910111213
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
News Every Day |

Why three-point shooting is a need for the Cavs

Chicago Bulls v Cleveland Cavaliers Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images

This isn’t something the Cavs are bad at per say, but there’s room for improvement.

The Cavs actually aren’t especially bad at three-point shooting. When the season stopped in March, they were 19th in three-point accuracy, per Cleaning The Glass, but 17th in frequency. If anything, there’s an argument to be made that the Cavs simply weren’t taking enough three-pointers.

That argument, though, falls apart some after a scan down the Cavs’ roster. Cleveland has a few above-average to good three-point shooters at the top of its roster, but also a number of players who are average to below average for their position. Here’s the rundown as detailed by Cleaning the Glass:

Some context for the data: Osman had a 4% bump from 2018-19 to 2019-20 that put him above the league average of 35.7%. It’s unclear if that will hold or he’ll settle in closer to league average. Exum has good accuracy, but it only accounts for 32% of his total shots, putting him in the bottom 20% of wings, per Cleaning The Glass. Unless there’s an unforeseen jump, that’s just not going to be part of his game. Larry Nance Jr.’s three-point shooting looked real, but let’s see if it holds another year, particularly if he dials up the volume.

For Porter Jr. and Garland, both were better (as most players are) on catch-and-shoot looks vs. pull-up threes. In Porter’s case, he’s 15% better on catch-and-shoot three-pointers vs. pull-up opportunities. (Garland was a mere 7.5% better). But both took almost the same amount of catch-and-shoot three-pointers vs. pull-up three-pointers. (Garland took 2.6 vs. 2.4; Porter Jr. took 1.6 vs. 1.4, per nba.com). Those splits indicate that the Cavs are giving both players a decent amount of on-ball opportunities.

The only two unassailable three-point shooters on the roster are Collin Sexton and Kevin Love. Sexton shot 11.1% in December on three-pointers and still finished at 38% for the year. In fact, he took 1.9 three-point attempts per game in December, shot that poorly and preceded to take 4.6 per game the next month at a 44.6% clip. He’s legit.

As for Love, his most valuable role now is as a floor spacer. For the year, he took seven three-point attempts per game with 5.3 coming on catch-and-shoot attempts and 1.6 on pull-ups. Love was just under 40% on catch-and-shoot attempts, accounting for 40.7% of his overall shot diet. That’s a massive increase from Timberwolves-era Love who worked primarily at the elbow. Especially if he doesn’t want to play minutes at center, this is what Love is now.

Overall, the argument is this: the Cavs have good three-point shooters, but need more. Scheme adjustments — which are theoretically easier to do when the team isn’t changing the head coach midseason — would help too. And if Cleveland dials up more three-pointers, it also should create more space for Andre Drummond and others operating in the dunker spot and rolling the rim. Adding in Dylan Windler — who will be in older rookie, but is well-liked in the organization — should help with that even if he gets 15 minutes a game. If nothing else, Windler projects as a deadeye shooter.

The Cavs also will need the off-the-dribble, pull-up three-pointers too. Over time, that has to be a shot that at least one of Sexton, Garland or Porter Jr. needs to develop. Ideally, a second Cav — be it someone from that group or an incoming draft pick — needs to have that shot in their arsenal too. If/when this core competes for something, those are the shots teams need to generate. For that reason alone, giving them those reps now makes sense.

This is also where the league is headed. Teams are going to keep bombing three-pointers and making it part of their offense. To their credit, the Cavs’ roster building to date indicates they understand that. Even the John Beilein hire, as misguided as it was, came somewhat from a belief that a motion-heavy, spaced offense was the way to go in the modern NBA. There, though, is still work to be done.



Read also

Reports: U.S. may defund UN mission to Lebanon

Williams among six virus cases at Athletic Bilbao

Ohio drop box restrictions add new front to mail-in voting battle



News, articles, comments, with a minute-by-minute update, now on Today24.pro




Today24.pro — latest news 24/7. You can add your news instantly now — here